Deafguy25
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
- Messages
- 230
- Reaction score
- 0
Ok thanks for clarifying
They can implant their children all they want. I dont care about that but I think AVT is just cruel. Taking away all visual cues from little deaf kids for the sake of getting them to 'hear". I cant stomach that sick method. Also, oral-onoly is just bordering on abuse because it puts the deaf child at risks for language delays or deficits if they cant pick up on it.
I always advocate for giving them both...ASL and speech.
Again, you believe it is abuse, just like the pro-AV people think that not implanting is bordering on abuse. Why is our view more valid?
 
				 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 It's like you already know who Deafguy25 really is.
  It's like you already know who Deafguy25 really is. I've met maybe ... 4 ADers in real life, possibly 5 although I'm not positive if one person is who I think might be on AD.  I don't think he's anyone I know, but who knows ... I've encountered hundred of young kids with CIs at conferences and meetings, maybe we've rubbed shoulders somewhere. If so, I hope he responds to my pm warning him about you
 I've met maybe ... 4 ADers in real life, possibly 5 although I'm not positive if one person is who I think might be on AD.  I don't think he's anyone I know, but who knows ... I've encountered hundred of young kids with CIs at conferences and meetings, maybe we've rubbed shoulders somewhere. If so, I hope he responds to my pm warning him about you  .
 .