Another, "I didn't do it!"

Status
Not open for further replies.
*chirp chirp* Steinhauer :wave:

Jiro said:
if there was a DEFINITE proof from just one allegation out of several allegations... would you still vote for Cain?

or are you going to tell me - "well it depends on what happened and if it isn't that bad.... yea I'll vote for him"?
Click to expand...
 
TXgolfer said:
So, you don't have any proof?
Click to expand...

Got what I need. It is available to you too. I can't be responsible for the fact that you refuse to ignore it and continue to cast dispersions on 4 women in favor of supporting one man that has already been shown to be lying.
 
jillio said:
Got what I need. It is available to you too. I can't be responsible for the fact that you refuse to ignore it and continue to cast dispersions on 4 women in favor of supporting one man that has already been shown to be lying.
Click to expand...

Meh, you haven't posted one link to the "formal charges" you claimed.

I would never in a million years "cast dispersions" though :lol:

I am not in favor of anyone....I am in favor of waiting for ACTUAL facts.
 
TXgolfer said:
Meh, you haven't posted one link to the "formal charges" you claimed.

I would never in a million years "cast dispersions" though :lol:

I am not in favor of anyone....I am in favor of waiting for ACTUAL facts.
Click to expand...

Sure. You are waiting for actual facts. You just keep trying to convince people of that.:cool2:
 
TXgolfer said:
Meh, you haven't posted one link to the "formal charges" you claimed.

I would never in a million years "cast dispersions" though :lol:

I am not in favor of anyone....I am in favor of waiting for ACTUAL facts.
Click to expand...

Link? What? You don't know how to access the news? You seem to find all the right wing sites easily enough.:dunno2: Just add "reputable source" to your search criteria. You'll find it.
 
jillio said:
Link? What? You don't know how to access the news? You seem to find all the right wing sites easily enough.:dunno2: Just add "reputable source" to your search criteria. You'll find it.
Click to expand...

:hmm: Oh well. I backed up my statements with court records.
 
The initial accuser is going public .... finally.

Cookies must be enabled | The Australian

The same person who initially claimed they did not want to go forward .... hmmm. Even Cain's secretery - who was in the other room with the door open, denies Kraussar's allegations.

And yet, Cain is staying in the lead.


At the press conference in Arizona, Cain said that he recalled Kraushaar's complaint but that her accusations were "found to be baseless."
Click to expand...

And Bialek's claims appeared to be .... non - existent.
 
jillio said:
Sure. You are waiting for actual facts. You just keep trying to convince people of that.:cool2:
Click to expand...

Meh, people are free to believe what they want.... It's not about me anyway.
 
TXgolfer said:
Meh, you haven't posted one link to the "formal charges" you claimed.

I would never in a million years "cast dispersions" though :lol:

I am not in favor of anyone....I am in favor of waiting for ACTUAL facts.
Click to expand...
Could be worse than aspersions. :eek3:
 
TXgolfer said:
Meh, people are free to believe what they want.... It's not about me anyway.
Click to expand...

Nope. It is about the paternalistic attitude that you have exhibited and that is prevalent in this society.
 
jillio said:
:laugh2:

You backed up irrelevant statements regarding bankruptcies. :laugh2:
Click to expand...

You are certainly entitled to that opinion. Some of us do consider her past actions as relevant in determining her credibility given the lack of evidence.
 
TXgolfer said:
You are certainly entitled to that opinion. Some of us do consider her past actions as relevant in determining her credibility given the lack of evidence.
Click to expand...

As well as the paternity suit filed by a man claiming he was not the father of her child.

He won by the way. Just means she was proven a money grubbing liar at least once.
 
jillio said:
Nope. It is about the paternalistic attitude that you have exhibited and that is prevalent in this society.
Click to expand...

Again you are welcome to your opinion I guess....
 
But John J. "Jack" Pitney Jr., a political scientist at Claremont McKenna College in Southern California, said Cain has handled the crisis poorly from the start.

"His initial response was confused and suggested that he hadn't really thought about it," Pitney said. "So he flunked the first test of crisis communication, which is to get your story straight. Now, the approach of going after the accuser isn't going to sit well with a lot of people."

Cain also runs the risk of diminishing himself by personally going after Bialek. "Instead of talking about high-level issues, he's impugning the integrity of a previously obscure person from Chicago," Pitney said.


Read more: Cain: 'I have never acted inappropriately with anyone'

Sharon Bialek, the fourth woman to allege that Herman Cain sexually harassed her--and the first to do so live on television--spoke to the news media on Monday. Bialek's press conference appears to have cut Herman Cain's chances of winning the Republican presidential nomination almost in half.

Just before it was announced that a woman and her attorney, Gloria Allred, would be holding a press conference Monday, the prediction markets gave Cain a 6.8 percent chance of becoming the Republican Party's presidential nominee. By the time the press conference ended, Cain's chances in the prediction markets had dropped to 3.8 percent.

Accuser



According to a report from the Chicago Sun-Times, Cain and Bialek were seen speaking at a Tea Party event last month. The report claims that the two "hugged each other backstage in a full embrace like old friends" before "She grabbed his arm and whispered in his left ear."

"She kept talking as he bent to listen, and he kept saying "Uh, huh. Uh, huh," the report says.

Herman Cain: "I don't even remember" Sharon Bialek - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

On whether he anticipates additional charges of sexual harassment could arise on top of the handful that came to light over the past week, Cain said on Tuesday, "There will probably be others" because there's "a machine" working to keep "a businessman out of the White House." He added that if more accusations continue to surface, he "will continue to respond."

Herman Cain Press Conference: Sharon Bialek Allegations Addressed By Candidate

Covering his butt. I bet there will be others, but not for the reasons he has stated.:hmm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top