Another, "I didn't do it!"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, so you didn't play into the "OMG, she had a tax lien! OMG, she declared bankruptcy!" game? Right.:laugh2:

The very minute the news broke, you began looking for any reason you could find to discredit the accusers. Speaks for itself.

I looked for nothing, it was reported. No assumptions *shrug*

BTW she declared bankruptcy twice.
 
As Herman Cain is running for President, it has everything to do with the upcoming debate. I can assure you, these allegations will be mentioned as a diversionary tactic from the real issues at hand.

Let's see.... you questioned Obama's birth location and religious affiliation. You believed the allegations.
 
No one has called them liars? You might want to scroll back in this very thread.
Huh? We don't even know what the other women said because they haven't said anything. How can anyone accuse someone of lying when they haven't said one word yet? We don't even know who they are.
 
Huh? We don't even know what the other women said because they haven't said anything. How can anyone accuse someone of lying when they haven't said one word yet? We don't even know who they are.

Oh, I see...so saying that the fact that they filed formal complaints doesn't mean it really happened is not accusing them of lying? Okay.
 
Read your own posts. The implication is glaring.

:lol: I have no idea if they are lying or not.....we don't have any evidence to judge. All we have are accusations and one of the people making those accusations doesn't look real credible.

Why would you even bother to question credibility if you did not intend to imply dishonesty now?

Because the accuser presented no evidence. Simple.
 
What
does
this
have
to
do
with
Cain
and
sexual
harrassment?

Well ..... in case you missed it. Cain is running for President. Yeah ... I know ... it was kind of hard to miss when you were too busy lynching him.
 
:lol: I have no idea if they are lying or not.....we don't have any evidence to judge. All we have are accusations and one of the people making those accusations doesn't look real credible.



Because the accuser presented no evidence. Simple.

What evidence has Cain presented that would indicate that he is not guilty? "I don't remember anything about it." "Oh, wait, maybe I have a vague memory..."

You are not applying the same criteria to both the women and the man in this situation when you are trying to determine credibility.

Frankly, I don't think Cain looks credible.
 
Oh, I see...so saying that the fact that they filed formal complaints doesn't mean it really happened is not accusing them of lying? Okay.
Filing a formal complaint isn't the same as something actually happening. Since it was never tried, we don't know the facts of their complaints.
 
What evidence has Cain presented that would indicate that he is not guilty? "I don't remember anything about it." "Oh, wait, maybe I have a vague memory..."

You are not applying the same criteria to both the women and the man in this situation when you are trying to determine credibility.

Frankly, I don't think Cain looks credible.

Nor do I. And I do not think we will be the only ones thinking this at all.
 
Well ..... in case you missed it. Cain is running for President. Yeah ... I know ... it was kind of hard to miss when you were too busy lynching him.

No, he isn't. He is running for the Republican candidacy to run for President. You are putting the cart before the horse.

Was the use of the word "lynching" a well planned attempt at an implication, or just another racial slip on your part? I am pretty sure it was the slip.
 
Oh, I see...so saying that the fact that they filed formal complaints doesn't mean it really happened is not accusing them of lying? Okay.

Of course not. :lol: It states an openness to waiting for facts/evidence

BTW We linked court cases but you still haven't linked "formal complaints" or "formal charges"
 
Well ..... in case you missed it. Cain is running for President. Yeah ... I know ... it was kind of hard to miss when you were too busy lynching him.

Troll much?

I have stated repeatedly my only issue here is his lack of experience. Oh, and the fact you are trying repeatedly to hijack this thread into yet another anti-Obama thread. When all you have is gasoline to douse the fires, it creates a lot of heat. You have stated:

Women lie
Gloria Allred is bad
Liberals are having a party
Obama sucks
Biden agrees Obama sucks
Economy is bad
 
Of course not. :lol: It states an openness to waiting for facts/evidence

BTW We linked court cases but you still haven't linked "formal complaints" or "formal charges"

Like I said, making an assumption that he is innocent, and they have something to hide.
 
What evidence has Cain presented that would indicate that he is not guilty? "I don't remember anything about it." "Oh, wait, maybe I have a vague memory..."

You are not applying the same criteria to both the women and the man in this situation when you are trying to determine credibility.

Frankly, I don't think Cain looks credible.

The burden of proof is on the accuser....
 
Showed a bit of an explosive temper in dealing with reporters, too.

:lol:. Guess no one will call him cool and collected. I don't envy his PR handlers if he does get the candidacy.
 
Cain's supposed make a live news conference any minute. Maybe we'll find out something, one way or another.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top