Amendment One, North Carolina Gay Marriage Ban, Passes Vote

TXgolfer said:
Not sure what you are claiming to be right about. :lol: The fact that the court has ruled on both sides of religious issues proves that matters are at the court's discretion and that the court is not bound by a strict separation of the 2.
Click to expand...

oh shoot. you miss my last-minute edit.

and plus government will have to intervene if religious group is going too far like Branch Davidian and Heaven's Gate.
Click to expand...
 
Foxrac said:
No, I disagree, your glad is nowhere.

Don't put your silly belief in my mouth, period.

Please back on topic and let forget about separation of church and state.
Click to expand...

Foxrac,

Just wanting to know why you did not jump all over Southpaw's ass (see post 6) for taking your thread off-topic. If you want to say that Southpaw was not off-topic, then why are you comparing about others posting about what was brought up by Southpaw? Can't have a double standard.
 
rolling7 said:
Foxrac,

Just wanting to know why you did not jump all over Southpaw's ass (see post 6) for taking your thread off-topic. If you want to say that Southpaw was not off-topic, then why are you comparing about others posting about what was brought up by Southpaw? Can't have a double standard.
Click to expand...

Take it to PM. Stop derailing every thread whining about who took something off-topic or not. Either address it with the very poster themselves or address it with a mod. :roll:
 
Last edited:
If everyone can't get married, then no one should get married :wave:
 
rolling7 said:
Foxrac,

Just wanting to know why you did not jump all over Southpaw's ass (see post 6) for taking your thread off-topic. If you want to say that Southpaw was not off-topic, then why are you comparing about others posting about what was brought up by Southpaw? Can't have a double standard.
Click to expand...

In my thread, I don't mind to let off topic for a little bit and Southpaw doesn't make continuous off topic, unlike rest of other members. You and other members made continuous off topic and attacking other members that effectively ruin my thread. You and other members don't have respect and doesn't behave so well. You can't force everybody to agree with you and your tactic won't work for us so could leading to endless debate. I found you to be most disrespecting member in this forum and I'm originally nice guy in the real world, however with you, it doesn't happen anymore.

Secondly, Southpaw is just expressing his opinion and he/she doesn't mention about the constitution. This section isn't place to continuous debate but it is about current events. I don't expect about my thread has ruined and prevent him/her from ability to answer in comfortable area. Do not call his/her name or bring his/her name to be blamed for ruin the thread. None of his/her fault, though.

Lastly, please go back to topic and any questions about concern with thread should asked in PM.

AlleyCat said:
Take it to PM. Stop derailing every thread whining about who took something off-topic or not. Either address it with the very poster themselves (in this case, Southpaw) or address it with a mod. :roll:
Click to expand...

Thanks, I don't take this member as contribute to ruining my thread.
 
Foxrac said:
Thanks, I don't take this member as contribute to ruining my thread.
Click to expand...

You're right -- I meant to say your name, not Southpaw. (Because Rolling was complaining to you.) I went back and fixed my typo :)
 
Jiro said:
all over the Constitution and legal cases.

for starter... Engles vs Vitale (1962) on prayer in school. Supreme Court ruled that prayer in school violated the Establishment clause of the First Amendment.
Click to expand...

That was in 1962! I have failed to see the all over thing!
 
Reba said:
About this statement:

"If everyone can't get married, then no one should get married"
Click to expand...

Ok, I thought you were refer to entire of my thread and it will be clearly if you use quote.
 
airportcop said:
Trolling? I was far from trolling. I was just debating your friend! Good night friend!
Click to expand...

You aren't debating but just useless attack. For debate with someone so you should be able to response in civil way without attacking - look at Reba and she made a point without attacking.

You are going off topic so that why I asked you to get on topic.

The mod had clean some part of this thread and please keep it clean.
 
Back
Top