A wonderful new about Prince Charles & Camilla

ravensteve1961 said:
Are The british stupid or what? Well Prince charles is getting married again. Why didnt Camilla rejected charles? because hes a murderer!! He killed ex wife diana. Dont give me that balony he didnt cause hes just like O.J Simpson. He did it cause diana was gonna take his money and his kids sooner or later.Why hasnt O.J Simpson found another girl huh? Why hasnt mike tyson remarried? Because americans arent a forgiven society like the british are.

Off your meds again, Steve?

:roll:

Diana died when the car she was riding in, crashed. Paparazzi are responsible for her death. Not Prince Charles. He's an adulterer and a cad, but he's not a murderer.

Get a grip.
 
ravensteve1961 said:
I have a feeling when the queen dies and charles becomes king. Camilia is gonna contact the CIA in america to assassinate charles and Camilia would become queen. Perfect endeing for this insanity huh?


huh!?? where the heck this come from?? this is the MOST DUMBEST statement i have ever heard of!! sheesh!! :roll:
 
Just 'cos their prince, or king-to-be is a so-called murder doesn't mean that the entire country is stupid.
 
Meg said:
Like every other young girl, I was enthralled when Diana married Prince Charles. I thought Diana met a Prince Charming.

Turned out it is not Prince Charming, but Prince Cad.

I don't care about Prince Cad or Camilla. They destroyed Diana's self esteem with their deception. I dont care if Queen Elizabeth didnt want Cad to marry Camilla. Cad should have known better to treat Diana with respect, not mockery.

Hence I dont care if they are getting married. They are not getting my blessing.

:werd: :gpost:

The Queen knew of the affair a long time ago, but pushed him to marry, so there could be an heir to the throne. I'm not sure, but, wasn't it improper for him to marry a divorcee'? And, if it was improper before, than why isn't improper for him to marry her now?
 
ravensteve1961 said:
In that case Halle Berry and O.J Simpson would make a great couple.

:eek: why would you say like that ?? Ugh :confuse: What would Halle Berry do with O.J. ??

*bang my head* Amn't I okay ???
 
Meg said:
Like every other young girl, I was enthralled when Diana married Prince Charles. I thought Diana met a Prince Charming.

Turned out it is not Prince Charming, but Prince Cad.

I don't care about Prince Cad or Camilla. They destroyed Diana's self esteem with their deception. I dont care if Queen Elizabeth didnt want Cad to marry Camilla. Cad should have known better to treat Diana with respect, not mockery.

Hence I dont care if they are getting married. They are not getting my blessing.
:gpost: I admire and respect Diane as well. She was very strong woman.


ravensteve, you forget to take the medications this morning, noon, and afternoon, do you?
 
Last edited:
i too admire Diana and she was a good woman with a BIG heart -- i dont like Camilla so i dont give any blessings of any kind to idiot Charles and Camilla
 
Sabrina said:
Will you marry me ? Zesty ??

dumbo.jpg


YOU or HIM?? :P
 
Meg said:
Turned out it is not Prince Charming, but Prince Cad.

Hence I dont care if they are getting married. They are not getting my blessing.

Right on, Meg! I agree with you. No blessings for them from me either! :nono:

When I first heard about the engagement and the forthcoming marriage, I was dismayed and thought "oh no"! :|

I never had any respect for Prince Dumbo and Camilla. They disgust me with their infidelity and the way they flaunted their affair in front of the world. They're selfish because what they did affected the children from each marriage, but they didn't really care who they hurt in the process unless they get what they want.

It's a relief to hear that patsy-faced goldigger herself won't ever be called Princess of Wales. Too bad, the Queen doesn't have the gut to make Prince Cad abscond from the throne on the basis that his future to be wife's a divorcee like it had happened with King Edward and Wallis Simpson *sighing*.

I bet millions of Britons aren't pleased with this announcement, and there'll be many lukewarm messages of congratulations being given to Charles and Camilla. I saw a picture of the soon to be titled the Duchess of Cornwall's engagement ring. Boy, it's a ugly ring!

I suppose the forthcoming marriage is to be expected.

It'll be the sweetest revenge if their marriage failed but I doubt it. Let's see what the Karma will bring to them.

Shoot Charlie and Camilla to smithereens.... :rl:
 
^Angel^ said:
I understand Leibling I do but still he had all those times to even face the things he did to her while she was still alive...To be honest with you, part of me feels that he did this for a reason after seeing how people would look up to him after her death...

Yes, I understand its hard for the people who love and loyal Diana because she's well known in the world. Diana is still in my thought.

It's mainly important is William & Harry forgive their father and accept Camilla in their family.

The 2 princes deserve my blessing to their father & Camilla. C & C would not have my blessing if 2 boys dont accept their marriage plans.


I forgave my Dad after what he did to me in the past. He turn into good person after death of his 2nd wife. I notice most people changed alot after the death of their partners. Everyone cant be prefect.

This is a life! :ugh2:
 
ravensteve1961 said:
Are The british stupid or what? Well Prince charles is getting married again. Why didnt Camilla rejected charles? because hes a murderer!! He killed ex wife diana. Dont give me that balony he didnt cause hes just like O.J Simpson. He did it cause diana was gonna take his money and his kids sooner or later.Why hasnt O.J Simpson found another girl huh? Why hasnt mike tyson remarried? Because americans arent a forgiven society like the british are.

Charles is cold and heart man but no murder!!!!!!!!!! He would not do that to his sons! Got it? :mad:
 
Reba said:
What is "wonderful" about it? Two fornicating adulterers marrying each other. Well, I guess they deserve each other. I guess the good news is that they are too old to have children. I can't imagine what that poor baby would look like. :shock:

Who says that C & C plan to have baby? :confused:

Sure, its wonderful because they waiting for long to have Charles's son's blessing. It shows that Charles respect his sons.

Do you think anyone have to marry because of baby plan? No, anyone marry for the love, not baby plan.

Well, my father & his 2nd wife already have children during their previous marriage. They do not have to make a baby together if they dont want to. Its okay if they want marry. I do not against if oldest people want marry with no baby plan.
 
Nancy said:
I think Charles married Diana just to have a heir, but he cheated on her so he really didn't love her. He just "used" her to have kids.....come to think of it, Camilia was older so she was probably too old to have kids at the time.

I never cared for the Royal Family either....they treated Diana like dirt. Diana is really a "Queen" and well-deserved that title, not Elizabeth or any of the others...or even ugly Camilia.

Nancy


Yes, I agree everything what you said.

Thats what I said in my earlier post that Charles doesnt love Diana but see after his throne line.

I read alot about Diana's life. Everyone knows that Charles only marry Diana to have his throne line. Diana's story book said: She knew right away when she was in hospital to have Harry that her marriage with Charles is over. After come home from hosptial and face her life with 2 baby.

As you see it safasity Charles because he got his throne line at last then treat Diana dirt............... Everyone found the truth about Charles and realized that he only marry her to have his throne line, not for the love.

Diana found out the truth from Charles that its Camilla who push him to marry her because Camilla told him that Diana is still in love with him, thats how it got him idea because of throne line. (Diana trust Camilla blind about her feeling for Charles. Camilla betrayed her friendship with Diana).

Sad, isnt' it?
 
Charles and Camilla face cameras

Mrs Parker Bowles was wearing a large diamond engagement ring
Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles have hosted a dinner at Windsor Castle, their first public appearance since announcing their engagement.
Mrs Parker Bowles said the prince went down on one knee to propose and added: "I'm just coming down to earth."

She will take the title HRH Duchess of Cornwall after the civil ceremony at Windsor Castle on 8 April.

When the Prince of Wales, 56, becomes king, Camilla, 57, will be known as the Princess Consort and not Queen Camilla.


Princes William and Harry said they are "very happy" and wish the couple "all the luck in the future".

Charles said he and his wife-to-be were "absolutely delighted".

The Duke of Edinburgh and I are very happy that the Prince of Wales and Mrs Parker Bowles are to marry

As the couple arrived for Thursday evening's business gala dinner they were applauded by waiting guests, before posing for photographs.

Among those attending were Sir Jonathon Porritt, co-director of the Prince of Wales's Business and Environment Programme and Sir Stuart Hampson, chairman of the John Lewis Partnership.

The marriage will end years of speculation on a relationship which has spanned the decades since the couple first met in 1970.

The wedding will be a civil ceremony, which will be followed by a service of prayer and dedication in St George's Chapel at which the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, will preside.

Archbishop 'pleased'

"The Duke of Edinburgh and I are very happy that the Prince of Wales and Mrs Parker Bowles are to marry," said the Queen, in a statement.

Charles was married to Diana, Princess of Wales, who died in a car crash in Paris in 1997.

The princess famously referred to Mrs Parker Bowles as one of the contributing factors in the breakdown of her marriage to Charles.

The couple, who had two sons - princes William and Harry - had divorced when Diana died.

The platinum and diamond ring is a Royal Family heirloom

A spokeswoman for Princess Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, said he would not be making any comment on the wedding announcement.

Tony Blair said he was "delighted" for the couple and offered his congratulations, as did Conservative leader Michael Howard and Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy.

The marriage is likely to be a sensitive issue because Mrs Parker Bowles is divorced and her former husband is still alive.

If he became king, Charles would be the supreme governor of the Church of England and some Anglicans remain opposed to the remarriage of divorcees.

The Archbishop of Canterbury said: "I am pleased that Prince Charles and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles have decided to take this important step."

He added that he hoped the marriage would be "a source of comfort and strength" to the couple and those close to them.

BBC Royal correspondent Nicholas Witchell said: "This is a step not without considerable risk by the Royal Family.

HAVE YOUR SAY
I do not understand why he wasn't allowed to marry her when they met all those years ago - a lot of unhappiness would have been avoided

"They will be watching very carefully to see how public opinion unfolds."

Last year, a poll indicated that more Britons supported Prince Charles marrying Camilla Parker Bowles than opposed it.

Of those who responded to a Populus poll, 32% said they would support Charles if he remarried, while 29% were opposed.

However, most people - 38% - said they did not care, while 2% had no opinion.

Mrs Parker Bowles has joined the prince at numerous engagements in recent years - mostly at evening events for The Prince's Trust.

Clarence House staff were at pains to point out that she attended these events in a private capacity.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4252795.stm
 
Should Charles marry Camilla?

See the most British comments
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/4252851.stm


Very weird. It seems to be the closest the palace can get to having their cake and eating it. I cannot think of a historical precedent to Princess Consort. I think Charles should allow the throne to go straight to William.
Victoria Gemmell, North Vanvouver, BC, Canada

Another nail in the coffin of the monarchy!
Mr PB Beecher, Sheffield, England

Let them marry, live in private... and for Charles to forego any ascendancy to the throne - for the sake of genuine moral decency of our constitution.
Jim Martin, Preston, Lancashire

They should have got married when they first met all those years ago - it would have saved everyone a lot of heartache.
Vickie Gazzard, Bristol, England

The announcement of The Prince of Wales and Mrs Parker Bowles intention to marry has gravely upset me. The idea of Camilla obtaining a title should not even be entertained. The law should be enforced and require Charles to abdicate. To add insult to injury the very idea of not being married in the Church of England is even more upsetting and embarrassing. The British Monarchy is the head of the Church. He can get married but he should abdicate. God Save the Queen. Long Live HRH Queen Elizabeth II.
Jordan, Montego Bay, Jamaica

I think they deserve happiness. There are many divorced and remarried people in today's society and no-one objects. I wish them every happiness in the years that lie ahead.
Lizzy, Ballymena, Co Antrim

They are already together so they may as well get married. If the princes can accept it then that is all that matters!
Rina

Yes, Prince Charles should go ahead and marry Camilla.
Chrispin A Kamkangadza, Lilongwe, Malawi

This is good news. Those who suppress desires only do so because theirs is weak enough to be suppressed. Their unwavering resolve during the years is testimony to their dedication to each other. They have been through a lot together and I am glad they have coped well. Whether you are a royalist or not, it is hard not to wish them luck. Remember they are humans just like any of us. Let us draw a line and move on. Best of luck Charles and Camilla. May God bless the wedding.
Torac, London

Congratulations to the couple - after 35 years of deep love they can finally be together. I would say it's rather hypocritical that people did not put down Diana and her string of romances (both during and after her marriage) and yet jump all over Charles who has only ever loved one woman - and was told he couldn't marry her as a young man.
Karen, Cambridge, UK

I have always been in favour of the monarchy, but unless Prince Charles gives up the throne in favour of Prince William I will no longer feel able to support the monarchy after the death of Queen Elizabeth II.
Janet Davies, Farnham, Surrey

Oh great, now someone else will be paid a living by the British public. The youth of the nation is sick of this royal family, and we're not looking forward to giving these people a good life.
Chris

I am perfectly relaxed that the Prince for whom I have high regard, and Mrs Parker Bowles should marry. Much stupid comment is made regarding her title on the Prince becoming King. Prince Philip who is the father of the next king, did not receive the title of King, but of Prince Consort. No-one objects to that. Mrs Parker Bowles is not the mother of Prince William and so could not be the Queen Mother on Charles' death. The title Princess Consort is, in my opinion, therefore, entirely appropriate and in order.
GCC Duncan, Bridge of Weir, Scotland

I have always had respect for the Prince as he has maintained discipline to be only with Camilla where he could have had several affairs. We wish them the best of all!
Aslam Zavahir, Dubai, UAE

Surely one of the tenets of the Christian faith is forgiveness - I wish them every happiness.
Sheila Ellis, Shrewsbury, England

Yes they are made for each other but he should abdicate in favour of William. He cannot be a king of morals with his history.
Lisa, Nottingham, England

I would say to all those who will complain about Charles marrying to just shut up and mind their own business. The Church of England allows people who are widowed to remarry. Charles has every right to marry again just as the rest of this country do. He has acted as an ambassador for this country more times then any politician. If people are not happy with the proud history of this country I suggest they pack up their bags and get out and stay out.
Mark, Bracknell

I am delighted to hear of the marriage of Charles and Camilla as they both deserve the happiness that they will soon get.
Jamie, Glasgow, Scotland

Prince Charles should not be allowed to marry a divorcee especially one who was so constructive in the downfall of his first marriage. She is simply a glorified mistress.
Lesley, Liverpool

To tell the truth I don't really care if they get married or not. All of these pompous goings-on from various royal commentators saying that it's not right etc is a load of rubbish. It's succeeded in turning my generation (17) into a bunch of people who are completely apathetic of the royal family.
Matt, UK

It's about time! When two people who have obviously loved each other for 35 years, it proves that they are truly soul mates and have a deep and abiding relationship. I wish them well and the UK should follow suit.
Kirstin Decker, Chicago, USA

I think it is high time the royal family learnt from repetitive blunders. May the prince's son, heir of the throne be able to avoid any fatal mistake and marry the one he genuinely wishes to. It is an overwhelming moment for the Prince of Wales. Best wishes to them both.
Christian, London

Not acceptable at all. If he knew her after Princess Diana's death then that would be a different story. But being the third party while Princess Diana was alive, that makes them both guilty! I wouldn't care if they are both together, but why should they choose this marriage? It's absurd and what kind of example is the future king proving? It really puts me off respecting him if he becomes the king! I think he should bypass his kingship to Prince William.
Gabriella Lee, the Netherlands

About time too! Life is too short, the Prince deserves some happiness. Who else waits until his 60's to take up the job he has been trained for? There are too many double standards around this issue. Do we give every divorcee this degree of long term comment and hassle? There are many remarried divorcees and surely there are far more important issues for our concern. Let the churches concentrate on the core issues on which they agree so that they can work together and put aside the minor human differences that separate them.
Brian Edwards, Argentat, France

I'm happy to finally hear this. This man has loved this woman for 30 years and they were meant to be together. No one will deny that William and Harry are something good that came of a not-so-good marriage and everyone in the world loved Diana, but I believe these two are soul mates.
Rinkrat, California

This is a sad day for the UK. I for one won't be celebrating their marriage. Charles should abdicate and William should be King.
Pauline, UK

We really need to remember that Prince Charles is still a human. It would be unfair for him if he isn't allowed to remarry as many people have today. If he really loves her then why should it be bad?
Marc Baldwin, East Grinstead, West Sussex, England

He should practice what he preaches. As head of the Church, he preaches no remarriage to divorcees whose previous spouse is still alive. Do we want a hypocrite a King, as well as head of the Church?
Chris Austin, Bury St Edmunds, UK

I think it's great, happiness is hard to find. He will still make a good King and now it will be with the support of the woman he loves. Camilla is obviously a good and kind woman who understands him, she has waited in the wings for long enough.
Clair Hanwell, London

I am not surprised that they are to be married although can't say I agree with it and I don't see why Camilla should be given a title of any sort. I suppose the most important thing is that the Princes are comfortable with it.
Victoria, West Midlands

What wonderful news indeed!! All that matters is that Prince Charles and Camilla love each other. The Queen has given her blessings and Prince William and Prince Harry have accepted her. Princess Diana died with her lover Dodi eight years ago. Its time to move on for Prince Charles. I am very happy for the couple and wish them both happiness and long life together.
Margaret Meiling Wang-Soloman, Singapore/Poole UK

Charles and Camilla are obviously extremely dedicated to one another. They deserve to be happy. Camilla, has always been so dignified and I think she will make a brilliant addition to the Royal family. I wish them all the luck in the world!
Sara-Jane, Lancashire, England
 
Yes they should be allowed to marry. In this day and age we should admire their commitment and despite previous problems they should be allowed to be happy for the rest of their lives.
Julie Fitzgerald, Thirsk, England

I think that as long as they are both happy and William and Harry don't object then we shouldn't either! Just because Charles is royalty that doesn't stop him being human! He deserves some happiness as much as the next man.
Caroline Hood, Reading, Berkshire

Who really cares! Let them get on with it, preferably in private, without all the media coverage and without wasting tax payers' money. Although, it already appears too late for that - earlier today, BBC One "joined" BBC News 24 at 10am for constant coverage of the "announcement" - showing the same reports, with the same reporters, showing the same footage over and over again, until the One O'clock news which then contained a further 18 minutes of the same reports and coverage. Nearly 3 and a half hours of coverage, plus a "News Special" being shown this evening. Whilst I agree that there is a need to report this event, can it really justify this amount over media coverage!
John, London, UK

Never should Charles be allowed to re-marry - especially to a divorcee. This is a good reflection of our country today. He also should forfeit the right to be king, as the rules are rules. If the law is changed to accommodate this, then we will riot.
Tim Cross, Reading berks

God help us, another Royal wedding with all the attendant nauseating press coverage.
Stuart Neville, Glasgow

I am happy for them to marry, but do not like the title HRH. What about her children - do they now receive titles?
Jane Robins, Westport, Connecticut, USA

They are a disgrace to the country. Neither makes any useful contribution to society. The media are mainly to blame for their antics - and it's time the media ignored them, and hopefully we'll move out of this medieval system into a modern day democratic country.
Tim, Bagshot, Surrey, England

Why all the fuss? Charles is a man of his word and I believe that he recently said that should fox hunting be banned, he will be off abroad skiing for the rest of his life. So good luck to them, leave the rest of us in peace.
Jerry, Devon, England

Give us a Bank Holiday so we can all enjoy the occasion, as in 1981!
Chris, Exeter Devon

Finally, a decent woman who will not try to out shine the Prince of Wales. Camilla has the right stuff to fit the royal part and also be a good wife. It is encouraging to see the UK still has some decency.
Jerry C. Oliver, USA

I am very happy for them both. I have a great deal of respect and admiration for Charles, for the charitable work that he does and the way that he tackles important, seemingly boring issues, such as organic farming. From the news report it looks as though a low key wedding is planned, although I'm sure there will be lots of media coverage, not because the couple will want it, but because of the demands of the media, driven by the public. I think that the decision to not make Camilla Queen is a sensible and pragmatic one that does show sensitivity.
Andrew Keene, Cambridge, UK

Charles should only marry Camilla if he intends upon stepping aside and letting William take the throne. By marrying Camilla he is breaking the rules of the Church of England, and as the next king he would be the head of the Anglican Church. There has been enough hypocrisy in this man's life, and he has done enough damage to the monarchy. He should step aside and let William take the throne.
JCQ, Boston, MA, USA

These so-called 'rules' about marriage, religion and royalty have been evolving for hundreds of years, and they continue to do so. These calls for Charles to abdicate are just ridiculous. The world is changing faster than ever before, so you can't force him to live by 1930's rules.
Simon, Bowness

Name me one job (outside of the Catholic Church) that says you can't be married? If their personal choices are to be married, no one is going to stop them. As for Charles ascending the throne¿ Camilla is not going to be Queen, as stated, so where is the problem? This is the 21st Century not the Dark Ages.
Sarah, York, UK

It's Just one more head to 'metaphorically' roll, when we finally become a republic.
Derek, Liverpool

Everyone, even Princes or Kings, must have the right to marry the person of his own preference. Moral or religious restriction return us to medieval ages!
Yioryos, Paris, France

Yes they should marry. Everyone else remarries so why not Prince Charles. Good luck to both of them.
Polly, Isle of Arran

The marriage, which will occur regardless of what the public thinks, needs to be paid for by Charles, not our taxes. As for Camilla receiving a title, I do not agree with it. Let us not forget, that Royals are ordinary people living an extraordinary lifestyle at the expense of the taxpayer.
Jane Baird, Liverpool, England

As an individual he is free to marry whom he chooses. Likewise as a Prince. The problem arises if he expects to be King. This is where the problem begins. Many people in the UK will not tolerate Camilla being Queen, regardless of the Palace appearing to 'think' that might change by the time he becomes King. If he wants to be the last monarch in GB then go ahead and make her Queen. I suspect he will get a nasty shock.
John Holmes, Doncaster, UK

If the Royals were allowed to marry who they loved then history would be quite different. I agree that the sham of a forced marriage would have made for happier lives in the past decades. They clearly have always loved and supported each other through thick and thin and more than most of us go through to get married. Loyalty and love should triumph in the end. And you only live so long so why shouldn't they be happy. They have definitely proved their love. In the end it can only be good when their family supports it. More marriages around the world should be like theirs.
Cynthia Palmer, Colorado Springs, Colorado USA

It's about time they got married, though I think it's silly to make her a Duchess and not a Princess of Wales. Camilla should be styled as Princess of Wales and when Charles succeeds his mother, Camilla must become his Queen Consort.
Siddo Deva, Oxford, UK

If, when Charles becomes King his wife becomes HM The Princess Consort the whole business is obviously a fudge to placate considerable public distaste, as Her Majesty she will, in all but name be his queen, or will she remain as HRH. I believe as Charles Windsor he is entitled to do what he wants, but as my future King and given there history, he should abdicate his right to the throne.
Michael Axcell, Grimsby, UK

Good grief, why on earth not? Hope they're happy.
Sarah, Denver, USA

I find this outrageous. How can anybody become head of the Church of England with this track record?
Katie, France

This is great news. They seem to have made all the right decisions regarding her title and where to get married. What a pity that so many of those that choose to criticise cannot get their facts right - Camilla is not a Catholic - her ex husband was, but she did not convert.
Philip Parke, Leigh on Sea, England

In my opinion, Charles should have had the guts to marry Camilla from the beginning. It has turned out to be the same thing after all. He could have saved Princess Diana, himself and others close to him, a lot of heartache. If it was done in this manner, maybe then he would have had more respect from his fellow Britons.
Alex, Nassau, Bahamas

The time has come to let Prince Charles get on with his life and marry a woman who has held herself with dignity through hard times caused by the British media. Good luck to both of them.
Karl McLaughlin, Chorley, England.

I do not understand why he wasn't allowed to marry her when they met all those years ago. A lot of unhappiness would have been avoided. Good luck to them both.
Doreen Brown, London UK

think the public and press hypocrisy is ludicrous... separation, divorce, remarriage and even not getting on with the in-laws (from Diana's p.o.v) are all perfectly commonplace in our society and for the Royals to be criticised for living by these same standards is a shame. I am not sure how any ceremonial role for Camilla would fare in public opinion; I feel that we haven't grown to know her as much as the rest of the Royals and so she wouldn't exactly fit the bill for a state representative, for example. On the more personal level, though, I think they deserve every happiness.
Ben Clawson, Cambridge, England.

Sure he can marry Camilla but, not still be heir to the throne. After all, she is a divorcee. William should be the next king.
Sue Bates, Bourne, Lincolnshire

Will we get a day off work on the 8th April to celebrate, do you think? He is the future King of England for goodness sakes!
David Godden, Guildford, Surrey

I have nothing against Prince Charles and Camilla getting married. I just wish that Charles should have been allowed to marry Camilla who he was very clearly in love with. Then Princess Diana would not have had to endure most of her adult life unhappy.
Sue Newman, London

It seems the majority of British people are against the marriage of Charles and Parker Bowles. Is it not time the British public were allowed a referendum on the future of the monarchy?
Allan MacKinnon, Glasgow, Scotland

All things considered I'm more interested in why so many people wanted to go to a midnight opening of a new IKEA store!
Tony Crooks, Eastbourne England

Before anyone wishes to pass judgement on the Prince or Mrs Parker-Bowles, first examine your own life. If you are positive that you have never made any mistakes or led a sinless life, let us all know.
Mark Fleming, Dundee
 
Back
Top