I would *think* it would be much more difficult to do that once the plane is in the air.
They are trained to take control of the situation. They just don't sit there and do nothing.
I would *think* it would be much more difficult to do that once the plane is in the air.
They are trained to take control of the situation. They just don't sit there and do nothing.

One is an adjunct instructor of Arabic at the University of Memphis. The other is a religious leader with the Islamic Association of Greater Memphis. They live in the USA, it's more than likely that they speak English.
Isn't the whole security screening process designed to prevent a terrorist from boarding a plane? Would that be because if a terrorist were able to board a plane, they could blow it up? I wonder what good a Marshall would do in a situation like that
If it had not been for the long sordid history of Muslim extremists hijacking planes, I doubt there would be any "unreasonable fear" of it ever happening again.
Wait a minute. You"re deaf, right? Try to apply what you just said to the situation with the deaf.
This is one reason why.
Lebanon news - NOW Lebanon -Egyptian Sheikh: A woman's face is like a vagina
They say her face is like a vagina and it attracts men? Um...okay I don't think it will attract me. It will probably freak me instead. However, from what the article says, it sounds like someone damaged her face pretty bad.
I think they will want publicity to spread the knowledge of such discrimination. So, trial it will be.
Maybe the passengers heard these men making comments that disturbed them or saw something that made them uncomfortable? They didn't take the vouchers because these men weren't on their plane anymore! All I was saying is that there is more to this story as there always is. Two parts, not just one!
Women's right is essentially nil when compared to what men are allowed to do.
Aren't there air marshals on the planes? Aren't they responsible to handle situations like these? If they suspect people of being terrorists, it's their duty to assess the situation and remove the threat from the plane.
The passengers did not take the airline up on their offer of a voucher. Evidently, they weren't too uncomfortable.
And just because someone is uncomfortable doesn't give the airline the go ahead to discriminate. These men were doing nothing wrong. If someone is uncomfortable, it has nothing to with them, but with the person's own biases, prejudices, and discriminations. That person is the problem. Not the one minding their own business and creating no threat.
According to their version of events....again we have only heard one side
Don't you think they would have been detained and questioned if they were heard making susceptible remarks?
They are trained to take control of the situation. They just don't sit there and do nothing.
The passengers did not take the airline up on their offer of a voucher. Evidently, they weren't too uncomfortable.
And just because someone is uncomfortable doesn't give the airline the go ahead to discriminate. These men were doing nothing wrong. If someone is uncomfortable, it has nothing to with them, but with the person's own biases, prejudices, and discriminations. That person is the problem. Not the one minding their own business and creating no threat.
The Air Marshals only get involved in criminal matters not airline decisions.
Not necessarily. With law suits being rampant and not wanting to push the limits I doubt it unless they found something during their search.
Not necessarily. With law suits being rampant and not wanting to push the limits I doubt it unless they found something during their search.