Do you consider 18 years old as a child molester if

Do you consider 18 years old as a child molester if he/she has sex with 17 years old

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 26.2%

  • No

    Votes: 48 73.8%
  • Total voters
    65
Liebling:-)))

Liebling:-)))

Sussi *7.7.86 - 18.6.09*
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
31,020
Reaction score
10
he/she has a sex with 17 years old girl/boy? Not just one year age difference but a very few years age difference.


Yes or not and explain why you agree or not... I am not interesting to hear about facts and law... but your own feeling and POV on this issues...


Come and discuss...
 
I voted No.

Because they both are over legal age to have Sex in many Commonwealth countries!!

Except in USA I think?
 
Opal said:
I voted No.

Because they both are over legal age to have Sex in many Commonwealth countries!!

Except in USA I think?
Click to expand...

Yes, but it's America, I am referring to since I notice some people consider 18 years old/legal age as child molester/sex offense for have sex with 17 years old or a few years younger in some threads.

The reason I created a thread is because I want to know your view on this issue but not talk about fact and law like what I said in my first thread.
 
I voted no, I don't think a year in differences would be much of a big deal. That's just in my opinion. ;)
 
The poll question doesn't give any circumstances, so it's way too broad to give a simple yes or no answer. It doesn't say whether or not it was consensual, whether or not this was a pattern for the guy, what the maturity level was for the girl, or any other details.
 
Reba said:
The poll question doesn't give any circumstances, so it's way too broad to give a simple yes or no answer. It doesn't say whether or not it was consensual, whether or not this was a pattern for the guy, what the maturity level was for the girl, or any other details.
Click to expand...

It's not hard to answer Yes or No after read my response post toward Opal's post.

Accord USA law:
Statutory Rape is be consider if a 18 years old (legal age) have a sex with 17 years old (minor) or few years younger. 18 years old get register as sex offense and also label them as sex molester, too.

Again, I am not here to talk about the fact and law but your own POV on my question. This is a simple question: Do you consider 18 years old as sex molester for have sex with one year younger or few years younger ?
 
Liebling:-))) said:
:confused: what do you mean?

They want to have sex each other with no force, that's what I am question about, not Rapist who force to have sex.
Click to expand...
Your poll question does not state the circumstances. There is no one answer that fits every situation.
 
I guess I am a child molester, cause I was 19 years old when I lost
my virgin and did it with a 17 years old virgin boy.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
.

Accord USA law:
Statutory Rape is be consider if a 18 years old (legal age) have a sex with 17 years old (minor) or few years younger. 18 years old get register as sex offense and also label them as sex molester, too.
Click to expand...

My Friend who i call one of my brothers had this happen to him. He went to a party and had sex with a girl who claimed to be 18 and he had just turned 18 a month before this well she turned out to be 15 1/2 or something and went bragging to her friends and a teacher over heard and told the principal and the principal called the police and she admitted to having sex but not claming to be 18 so now he's sitting in jail for 3 months and will have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

I voted No my ex fiance was 18 and i was 16. but the law doesn't care about where you are if you are under 18 you are not mature enough to have sexual relations unlike if you are in a non sexual relationship it's not illegal if the underage party turns 16 before the over age party turns 19.
 
Reba said:
Your poll question does not state the circumstances. There is no one answer that fits every situation.
Click to expand...

My question is not hard to answer... Legal age is being register sex offence/also label as sex molester that´s because he has sex with 17 years old... See the example of Lil_country_gal´s story... :(

I see nothing wrong if they want to have sex each other with no force but Rape is a different story.

I don´t like if anyone use it as an excuse to get legal age in trouble when she or he agree to have sex with him or her in first place.
 
Deafilmedia said:
I guess I am a child molester, cause I was 19 years old when I lost
my virgin and did it with a 17 years old virgin boy.
Click to expand...

Do you really think that you are a child molester that´s because you has sex with 17 years old boy? What´s about your view and feeling about this? Do you force him to have sex with you?
 
No, if the 18 and 17 year old are in a relationship. I had sex with my ex hubby when he was 19 and I was 17 years old. Oh well..


If the 18 year old forces the girl to have sex when she says no, then yes, he is a molester or rapist.
 
shel90 said:
No, if the 18 and 17 year old are in a relationship. I had sex with my ex hubby when he was 19 and I was 17 years old. Oh well..


If the 18 year old forces the girl to have sex when she says no, then yes, he is a molester or rapist.
Click to expand...

That´s an exactly what I am wondering about.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
My question is not hard to answer... Legal age is being register sex offence/also label as sex molester that´s because he has sex with 17 years old... See the example of Lil_country_gal´s story... :(
Click to expand...
That's why I said it depends on the circumstances. I don't understand how you can make such snap judgments without knowing all the facts and circumstances of a situation.

It's just an informal poll, and if I don't want to vote, so what?


I don´t like if anyone use it as an excuse to get legal age in trouble when she or he agree to have sex with him or her in first place.
Click to expand...
That's why sons should listen to their dad's advice when he tells them, "Don't mess around with girls under 18."

If they want to take their chances, then they have to live with the consequences.
 
I vote no, of course not. My cousin Josh, was 19 that time, he was dating with a girl who was 16 which only 3 years younger. Then that girl's grandparents end up trying to sue Josh and trying to put him in the prison, many crazy things so they finally left Washington and stayed in Minnesota till that girl became 18.

I absolutely don't believe in the ageism, the age is just number..
 
Back
Top