I am laughing at the hypocrisy exhibited some people here, the same people who say Lowe's is entitled to do what they want with their business and not have the government or any outside groups make decisions for them. Because it's all about money.
And yet, some of these same people are advocating for the banning of alcoholic beverages at sporting events? A big reason (notice, not "main reason," but certainly a big one) that many people go to sporting events is so they can drink alcohol and let go of some of their inhibitions to enjoy the game, which could otherwise not be enjoyable to them. I myself think that's a ridiculous reason, and when I go to an event I limit myself to only a couple beers. It's too expensive anyway.
Nevertheless, stadiums make a HUGE percentage of their money on alcohol sales. And I mean, absolutely HUGE. Banning alcoholic beverages would result in a major decrease in revenue and probably result in increased ticket prices. (This is the case in college athletics where alcohol is banned. The price of tickets have gone up exponentially as alcohol is done away with).
And just banning alcohol at sporting events isn't going to end it. People are still going to drink--in the parking lot (legal or not), at bars before the game, etc. Will stadiums be required to hire massive amounts of security personnel in order to make sure every person entering is not intoxicated?
I personally would not care if alcohol is banned. I don't go to enough sporting events for it to really affect me. I just think it's so funny how those who would advocate unrestricted business practices in one instances will change their stance on another.
H Y P O C R I T E S