Dangerous offender status for Deaf repeat sex offender

His trial went on for five weeks and it used up alot of interpreting services from one of the two interpreting services here. At the time, I had hard time to find interpreters for my work because they were there to provide their services for this defendant.
 
Royale said:
His trial went on for five weeks and it used up alot of interpreting services from one of the two interpreting services here. At the time, I had hard time to find interpreters for my work because they were there to provide their services for this defendant.
Click to expand...

Now....ain't that something?...A "6 time offender"...so much more important than a law-abiding citizen who needs an interpretor for his work!...You've a right to be angry and disgusted!

Seems to me this guy thinks and believes he's "got an ace in the hole"...using his deafness as "an excuse" for showing his dick and molesting women....Wondering if they suggested using some kind of "healing treatment" for him that I've heard about?....Well, after 6 times of repeating this "little game of his "of exposing his dick and "feeling women up" against their will....Looks like it's NOT WORKING!

Wouldn't surprise me if he didn't even "flash" his dick in Court!...Deaf or not, this guy needs to be locked up and the key thrown away...who knows if he might even have raped a child!
 
Banjo said:
Sounds like he belongs to a mental institution.
Click to expand...

I agree. The problem there is finding a forensic hospital that can actually provide approrpiate services for the Deaf. So, instead of actually doing something to reduce his dangerousness, they are just practicing social control. Sad, isn't it?
 
Royale said:
His trial went on for five weeks and it used up alot of interpreting services from one of the two interpreting services here. At the time, I had hard time to find interpreters for my work because they were there to provide their services for this defendant.
Click to expand...

Not sure why his trial is relevant to your workplace since everyone is entitled to a fair trial. It's hypocrisy to whinges about lack of equality between Deaf and hearing, but not grant Deaf charged with a crime the same access hearing criminals receive. Yes, the interpreter shortage sucks, but he is not the reason for the shortage.

The insidious slam here is a lowball.
 
souggy said:
Not sure why his trial is relevant to your workplace since everyone is entitled to a fair trial. It's hypocrisy to whinges about lack of equality between Deaf and hearing, but not grant Deaf charged with a crime the same access hearing criminals receive. Yes, the interpreter shortage sucks, but he is not the reason for the shortage.

The insidious slam here is a lowball.
Click to expand...

fair trial? I dunno about you but 6 times? I think we've been more than fair to him. Now trial is not needed. Off with his naughty hands! :giggle:
 
rockin'robin said:
Now....ain't that something?...A "6 time offender"...so much more important than a law-abiding citizen who needs an interpretor for his work!...You've a right to be angry and disgusted!
Click to expand...

Hearing sex offenders are still aware of everything being said in court. A Deaf sex offender is not. Why a Deaf sex offender is less important than a hearing sex offender? Frankly, royale is directing his frustration in the wrong channel.
 
souggy said:
Not sure why his trial is relevant to your workplace since everyone is entitled to a fair trial. It's hypocrisy to whinges about lack of equality between Deaf and hearing, but not grant Deaf charged with a crime the same access hearing criminals receive. Yes, the interpreter shortage sucks, but he is not the reason for the shortage.

The insidious slam here is a lowball.
Click to expand...

Sighs...

There are two different kinds of interpreting services here in Ottawa. One of them is contracted by the Federal government to provide interpreting services for Deaf and hard of hearing federal employees and I happen to be one of these employees.

The contracted agency did not have many interpreters available for us as they struggled to make them available for us for the last five or six weeks. Many interpreters of the agency were assigned to this case during this time period. In addition, I did speak to most of those federal Deaf employees and we had similar experiences.

Also, some meetings require a specific security clearance from PWSGC, DND or another agency/department and only FOUR of their interpreters are cleared to top secret meetings where I often attend.

Do not get me wrong that I so firmly believe every Deaf and hard of hearing have their right to have interpreters in any settings like court proceedings.

Finally we CANNOT use interpreters from another agency for two reasons: contract and security clearance.
 
Royale said:
Sighs...

There are two different kinds of interpreting services here in Ottawa. One of them is contracted by the Federal government to provide interpreting services for Deaf and hard of hearing federal employees and I happen to be one of these employees.

The contracted agency did not have many interpreters available for us as they struggled to make them available for us for the last five or six weeks. Many interpreters of the agency were assigned to this case during this time period. In addition, I did speak to most of those federal Deaf employees and we had similar experiences.

Also, some meetings require a specific security clearance from PWSGC, DND or another agency/department and only FOUR of their interpreters are cleared to top secret meetings where I often attend.

Do not get me wrong that I so firmly believe every Deaf and hard of hearing have their right to have interpreters in any settings like court proceedings.

Finally we CANNOT use interpreters from another agency for two reasons: contract and security clearance.
Click to expand...

I am aware of the security protocol surrounding government jobs, but it still doesn't resolve or address the shortage of interpreters experienced in judicial matters at large.
 
Royale said:
Sighs...

There are two different kinds of interpreting services here in Ottawa. One of them is contracted by the Federal government to provide interpreting services for Deaf and hard of hearing federal employees and I happen to be one of these employees.

The contracted agency did not have many interpreters available for us as they struggled to make them available for us for the last five or six weeks. Many interpreters of the agency were assigned to this case during this time period. In addition, I did speak to most of those federal Deaf employees and we had similar experiences.

Also, some meetings require a specific security clearance from PWSGC, DND or another agency/department and only FOUR of their interpreters are cleared to top secret meetings where I often attend.

Do not get me wrong that I so firmly believe every Deaf and hard of hearing have their right to have interpreters in any settings like court proceedings.

Finally we CANNOT use interpreters from another agency for two reasons: contract and security clearance.
Click to expand...

curious - why does this sex offender need many terps? It sounds as if he's hogging up 5 terps for a trial.
 
Jiro said:
curious - why does this sex offender need many terps? It sounds as if he's hogging up 5 terps for a trial.
Click to expand...

It beats me out; however, I assume he needed four or five terps in this special circumstance.
 
Royale said:
It beats me out; however, I assume he needed four or five terps in this special circumstance.
Click to expand...

O_O

what a sick man... he must be doing this out of mockery...
 
Jiro said:
fair trial? I dunno about you but 6 times? I think we've been more than fair to him. Now trial is not needed. Off with his naughty hands! :giggle:
Click to expand...

You'd would be happy to take advantage of the benefits to the accused in this country if you are ever arrested.
 
Royale said:
It beats me out; however, I assume he needed four or five terps in this special circumstance.
Click to expand...

Why would he need 4 or 5 terps for a legal proceeding? I can't see any judge ordering 4-5 terps for a single defendent.
 
jillio said:
You'd would be happy to take advantage of the benefits to the accused in this country if you are ever arrested.
Click to expand...

accused? I dunno about you but 6-times offender? SIX times? Definitely not an accusation in this case.

I'm all about fair trial and all but a repeated offender as bad as this guy? Enough is enough. Too bad Ottawa doesn't have "3 Strike Law" :aw:
 
Back
Top