- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 144
save gas
Obama's gonna win again
- Thread starter netrox
- Start date
- Status
save gas
jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 22
jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 22
No one is ignoring that; they simply don't see it.:P Only a very small minority (about 1% of the entire population) has distortions in thinking like that.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,491
- Reaction score
- 11
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,078
- Reaction score
- 336
I dont think Obama could have prevented Clinton from having an affair with Monica. I think Obama was too focused on his family life to worry about Clinton's sexual addiction problem.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,491
- Reaction score
- 11
I dont think Obama could have prevented Clinton from having an affair with Monica. I think Obama was too focused on his family life to worry about Clinton's sexual addiction problem.
As much as I like Clinton, he has problems of his own. I don't think Obama has similar issues. I can't see him having affairs with ohers.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2006
- Messages
- 28,871
- Reaction score
- 28
There is virtually no way to credibly deny the fact that this will have a deciding influence on a re-election bid.
Kinda makes you feel sorry for Trump and his birther nonsense, doesn't it. Obama just said, "Yeah, Trump? Watch this! In your face!"
...and he places his sunny shades on and turns around going 'YEAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH'
but I thought, if I may recall, they are in the process taking all the prisoners to ther places before closing it down by the beginning of 2012 or something? It is part of the signed contract Obama made....
LOL'ing because it's exactly as we forecast... the Republicans will still blame Obama anyway!
As always
Time to go for a walk, anyone? That saves gas!
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,078
- Reaction score
- 336
We all know that Clinton liked his women. He seems to have calmed down about his problem. I just hope that he and Hilary found their happiness because nobody deserves that torment by his problem.
I was just being silly.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,491
- Reaction score
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2006
- Messages
- 7,618
- Reaction score
- 27
I am considering using this quote as my signature, and giving you full credit. You are actually saying that a Liberal fixed something? And calling it a fact? *checking the sky colors*
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,491
- Reaction score
- 11
diehardbiker
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2004
- Messages
- 16,188
- Reaction score
- 16
Nah, he isn't going to be re-elect and I ain't gonna vote for him. I never had voted and will NEVER vote for Obama.
At this time, I have candidate in my mind that I am going to vote for. Glad he is going to run, and I hope he don't back off like Ross Perot. I believe that we need to restore our freedom, smaller government, end folly spending.
At this time, I have candidate in my mind that I am going to vote for. Glad he is going to run, and I hope he don't back off like Ross Perot. I believe that we need to restore our freedom, smaller government, end folly spending.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
Around the block, yes; to work, no.
Sorry, even if waterboarding was used to extract data, you actually think Obama would throw that data out? It doesn't work that way. It's a protocol for government to keep records of everything that's being said, even under those conditions. It's up to Obama to ignore or not but since Obama's the president, he can decide if data is valid or not.
We don't know what information the intel gave Obama - we just know that he made a decision based on the information he receieved - note that it's rumored that it's just a "gut" decision and that evidence was purely circumstantial since no one ever saw bin Laden there.
And apparently, his decision turned out to be significant.
And that's why he gets the main credit.
Suppose, let's say that he got it wrong and SEALs get there and found no bin Laden, who gets the blame? Obama.
We don't know what information the intel gave Obama - we just know that he made a decision based on the information he receieved - note that it's rumored that it's just a "gut" decision and that evidence was purely circumstantial since no one ever saw bin Laden there.
And apparently, his decision turned out to be significant.
And that's why he gets the main credit.
Suppose, let's say that he got it wrong and SEALs get there and found no bin Laden, who gets the blame? Obama.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
Are you sure that's why the price is going up? People have been cutting back, and cars have been improving their mileage, yet the price keeps climbing.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
No one gets the blame because no one (in the public) finds out. SEALs come and go without notice. The only reason we know what happened is because the information was released. If it hadn't been released thru official channels, you wouldn't even know what happened. In fact, we don't even know if there had been previous unsuccessful or aborted missions at other times and places.
"No one gets the blame because no one (in the public) finds out. ..In fact, we don't even know if there had been previous unsuccessful or aborted missions at other times and places."
If the public finds out, who gets the blame?
If the public finds out, who gets the blame?
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 44,482
- Reaction score
- 448
because of oil price, OPEC, conflict in Middle East, demand/supply and speculation.
- Status