- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 6,879
- Reaction score
- 7
I support them to service our country for whatever reason is, but I think it is better if women are in the non-combat only...
Quick summary:how come?
![]()
Don't be so sure about that. Military women aren't Amazons or martial arts experts. They aren't all physically fit. In fact, just from personal observation, they don't even appear to be maintaining the standards to which I was held prior to 9/11. I think they may be loosening the standards in order to meet numbers requirements. That's just my opinion.Women are raped out of the military also.....I'm sure that women in the military are very physically fit and in most cases, can hold their own with an attacker.
The problem is, if women can be sent to combat, then it can't be a voluntary choice unless it's made a voluntary choice for the men, too. Otherwise, that wouldn't be equality, eh? If women want combat equality, then they have to accept it all the way.I think it should be voluntarily if a woman wants to be in Combat. Her choice. If she passes all the stringent training and it's her wish to be in combat then so be it.
Successful modern combat requires self control in addition to aggression, under much training and experienced leadership; it's never about acting on violent impulses. Combat units don't need or want soldiers who are prone to emotional outbursts.Research shows that when women act on violent impulses, they are much more violent than men would be in the same situation.
Right from the title.So GI Jane is fake?![]()

Successful modern combat requires self control in addition to aggression, under much training and experienced leadership; it's never about acting on violent impulses. Combat units don't need or want soldiers who are prone to emotional outbursts.
Beowulf's mention of women snipers was as an example of their skill, not violent tendencies.
Non-combat? Yes, that's fine with me.Reba -- I'm curious. Are you okay with women being in non-combat only situations? Maybe yes?

Aack! Don't use that word! You might incite some women to violence!It depends on who is in the crosshairs.![]()

I'm against sending women into combat, and I've been consistently against it since my active duty days in the 1970's.
Successful modern combat requires self control in addition to aggression, under much training and experienced leadership; it's never about acting on violent impulses. Combat units don't need or want soldiers who are prone to emotional outbursts.
Beowulf's mention of women snipers was as an example of their skill, not violent tendencies.
Non-combat? Yes, that's fine with me.![]()

Whoever said women lack the stigma clearly is forgetting that many women carry a baby in the womb for nine months and then go through delivery. NOW tell me again that women don't have the stigma?
They also forget how men behave when they have a common cold. You would think they were dying of flesh-eating bacteria. No offense to my guy buddies, but seriously...come on. We know it's true!![]()
lol a full combat gear plus weapon weighs over 100 lbs.
can?
A lot of guys can't.