Daniels-Ryan for 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's your opinion and your right to whine.

*shrugs*
 
kokonut said:
That's your opinion and your right to whine.

*shrugs*
Click to expand...

No, you are whining about Obama at all time.

You just say Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama everyday...
 
Well, if he can only do a job right then that'd be a different story but so far everything he has done deserve a D-grade, maybe an F+.

Hey, don't read my posts. You can always put me on ignore.
 
kokonut said:
Well, if he can only do a job right then that'd be a different story but so far everything he has done deserve a D-grade, maybe an F+.

Hey, don't read my posts. You can always put me on ignore.
Click to expand...

Well, you use political game to criticize Obama, no doubt.

No, you should put me in your ignore list like you did to Jiro.

Only difference is everyone can see your post, especially quotes and Shel asked you to refrain from use Obama word in other thread but you aren't listen.
 
Just about everyone has given Obama a pass on just about everything. But that's for another thread for another day.

Ignore? It's about will power. And it's fun to watch, too.
 
kokonut said:
Just about everyone has given Obama a pass on just about everything. But that's for another thread for another day.

Ignore? It's about will power. And it's fun to watch, too.
Click to expand...

Only difference is you talk about Obama so negatively everyday, even there is no single day for you to praise at Obama.

For me, I have mixed of praise and criticize on Obama's job, unlike you do.

You need get a real life and criticize against Obama everyday isn't good, you should have spend your fun with your wife and kids.
 
Foxrac said:
Only difference is you talk about Obama so negatively everyday, even there is no single day for you to praise at Obama.

For me, I have mixed of praise and criticize on Obama's job, unlike you do.
Click to expand...

That's because he hasn't done anything that meets my expectation so far. He's in it way over his head. That's what you get when you vote for an inexperienced person.
 
kokonut said:
That's because he hasn't done anything that meets my expectation so far. He's in it way over his head. That's what you get when you vote for an inexperienced person.
Click to expand...

I disagree. ;)
 
Other alcohol sales restrictions--election day:

5 States prohibit the sale of alcohol on state and national Election Days. This restriction is a relic of the Prohibition era when saloons sometimes served as polling stations. The only states that still cling to statewide Election Day sales bans of alcohol at restaurants, bars and package stores are Kentucky and South Carolina. West Virginia still bans the sale of alcohol at package stores on Election Day. Alaska and Massachusetts also ban Election Day alcohol sales, except that local governments are authorized to provide an exemption from the ban.
Click to expand...
Current Blue Law States - ProhibitionRepeal.com

Nothing to do with religion.



The Daniels connection:

Daniels Strikes Down Restrictive Election Day Alcohol Sales Ban in Indiana

24 March 2010

Last week Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels signed legislation repealing the Prohibition-era ban on Election Day alcohol sales. Election Day alcohol bans are truly a relic of the Prohibition era when saloons sometimes served as polling stations. Indiana had a particularly harsh Election Day ban considering restaurant goers couldn’t even get a cocktail while the polls were open....
Click to expand...
Daniels Strikes Down Restrictive Election Day Alcohol Sales Ban in Indiana - The Speakeasy
 
TXgolfer said:
Not if they are not driving the boat.... :lol:

.

These lakes and the beach are different. It is legal there. But not before noon on Sunday. And that is what I mentioned in my post :)



Of course it "also covers" those. Never said it didn't

But the point is you said....


and that is incorrect.
Click to expand...

If they are not driving, it falls under public intoxication law.

And I still say that there is no law against cosuming alcohol on private property on Sunday.
 
kokonut said:
It's my way of agreeing with TXgolfer.
Click to expand...

You need to exercise a little thought and creativity and come up with a new catch phrase. We all know that is your attempt at an obscure reference to Obama's golfing.:roll: Just another way to insert your obsession into every thread.
 
TXgolfer said:
Nope...Most buy ahead of time pack a cooler and get busted on Sunday. Galveston actually has paddywagons that drive up and down the beach looking for it. I have seen private boaters cited for it on Lake Grapevine, Lake Conroe and Joe Pool Lake as well. Just for drinking before noon on Sunday......no sale involved. :)
Click to expand...

I take it you don't watch Cops?
 
TXgolfer is right about the sale and consumption of any drinks in Texas, especially the beaches and waterways. But, the cops dont care about the fact people are doing it. The cops are too smart...they wait for you to get behind the wheel and then get you for DWI....read: much more $$$$$$ for them. And dont worry....anyone else in the car/pick-up who is drunk also puts $$$$$$ in the cops pockets. Oh yes, before I forget,,,the cops keep the car too!!!!
 
jillio said:
The motive behind that is to keep people from getting drunk and showing up at the polls. Plus to prevent DUI on days that increased traffic can be expected.
Click to expand...
Like I said, nothing to do with religion.
 
Reba said:
Tousi, you are so right on! ;)
Click to expand...

Still haven't indicated what your point was. The discussion was in reference to laws restricting sales on Sunday, and how that was related to the religious population. You brought up holidays and election days. Totally unrelated to laws based on religious reasoning. You were given an explanation for those laws. You still have failed to show what point you were attempting to make. That all restriction laws are not based on religion? No one said they were. Just the ones restricting sales and purchase on Sundays.
 
jillio said:
Still haven't indicated what your point was.
Click to expand...
Not obvious enough? The point is, not all restrictions on alcohol consumption are a result of religion.

The discussion was in reference to laws restricting sales on Sunday, and how that was related to the religious population. You brought up holidays and election days.
Click to expand...
I mentioned only election days, not holidays. I thought it was interesting about election day restrictions, especially since this is election time in South Carolina. Also, Daniels (the original topic) was mentioned in those laws, so I thought it was relevant. I didn't realize you were the gatekeeper for posting criteria.

Totally unrelated to laws based on religious reasoning. You were given an explanation for those laws. You still have failed to show what point you were attempting to make. That all restriction laws are not based on religion? No one said they were. Just the ones restricting sales and purchase on Sundays.
Click to expand...
Other than :whip: posters who don't fall in line, what is your point in criticizing my post?
 
Reba said:
Not obvious enough? The point is, not all restrictions on alcohol consumption are a result of religion.


I mentioned only election days, not holidays. I thought it was interesting about election day restrictions, especially since this is election time in South Carolina. Also, Daniels (the original topic) was mentioned in those laws, so I thought it was relevant. I didn't realize you were the gatekeeper for posting criteria.


Other than :whip: posters who don't fall in line, what is your point in criticizing my post?
Click to expand...

No one ever stated that all restrictions on alcohol were related to religion; only the specific restrictions which were being discussed.

It wasn't criticizing...it was attempting to comprehend why you were making the point that not all restrictions were related to religion when nothing of the sort had been indicated. Kind of like making a point that doesn't need to be made as it had never been an issue. Perhaps you feel the need to defend anything that has a religous connotation whether it is relevent to the discussion or not. :shrug:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top