Royale
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2008
- Messages
- 4,644
- Reaction score
- 1
lol only by like 1.26 microseconds
But it is enough to lose about a day right?
But it is enough to lose about a day right?
Maybe after billions of years........It's still significant though I think
If that so, it would cause more days, less second to minutes to day to weeks. It show our age would be screw up as people tell "omg omgomg, you don't look like 100 years old, what's your secret?!?!"
scientists estimated that our Sun will go supernova in about 5 billions or so![]()
LOLscientists estimated that our Sun will go supernova in about 5 billions or so![]()
Maybe after billions of years........It's still significant though I think
Makes me want to enter a pact like the global warming family.....lol
A supernova within 100 light-years of the Earth would likely be a catastrophic event for our planet, but something as far out as T Pyxidis may or may not damage the Earth. One of the journalists in attendance pointed out this possibility during the questions session and Sion said that the main danger lies in the amount of X-rays and gamma rays that stream from such an event, which could destroy the protective ozone layer of the Earth and leave the planet vulnerable to the ultraviolet light streaming from the Sun.
I won't hold my breath for that one.It would be if you keep adding up all others major earthquakes that did this in the right locations. After 10 million years off of this Chile earthquake the Earth would've lost 4,536 seconds or 1.26 hours, so after 24 million years you'd lose a whole day's worth of the Earth's rotation.
Maybe after billions of years........It's still significant though I think
We'll be long gone by then.
