Sarah Palin's 150,000... wait.. MORE!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ad Exxon Mobile just posted a quarterly (just for 3 mos!) take in of 14 billion!
:lol:

Could that cooperation help us to Bail out??


Makes me wonder if we are barking up the wrong tree?

LOL
 
they gave her a budget to work with, and trust me a female VP canidate isnt to walk into kohl'd and JCPennys :laugh2: Really, in this day and age, $150,000 isnt very much. Alex Rodriguez makes 27 million dollars a year for the NY Yankees. Now THAT is excessive spending :cool2:

Are you sure you understand the whole issue?

First, Sarah Palin requested new clothings and RNC did not have a problem with that. What RNC did NOT expect was that she went on a shopping spree acting as "Wasilla hillbillies looting Neimus Marcus from coast to coast" and she asked her staff to buy her clothes on their credit cards!

Additionally, Sarah Palin is a pretty woman and she'd look great in nice clothes from Banana Republic or some stores. She doesn't need to spend $150,000 on looking good!

Trust you on a VP candidate is not going to walk into JCPenny's? Well, I know for a fact that Obama's family shops at the Gap and J.Crew's.

Obama's family represents the REAL MIDDLE CLASS.
 
Are you sure you understand the whole issue?

First, Sarah Palin requested new clothings and RNC did not have a problem with that. What RNC did NOT expect was that she went on a shopping spree acting as "Wasilla hillbillies looting Neimus Marcus from coast to coast" and she asked her staff to buy her clothes on their credit cards!

Additionally, Sarah Palin is a pretty woman and she'd look great in nice clothes from Banana Republic or some stores. She doesn't need to spend $150,000 on looking good!

Trust you on a VP candidate is not going to walk into JCPenny's? Well, I know for a fact that Obama's family shops at the Gap and J.Crew's.

Obama's family represents the REAL MIDDLE CLASS.


cry me a river. boo-fucking-hoo.
 
Now some of you finally know what kind of person, Sarah Palin is... :hmm:

I am not surprised because I had no good feeling about her few minutes AFTER learn McCain picked her up as his VP.




 
are you sure you understand the whole issue?

First, sarah palin requested new clothings and rnc did not have a problem with that. What rnc did not expect was that she went on a shopping spree acting as "wasilla hillbillies looting neimus marcus from coast to coast" and she asked her staff to buy her clothes on their credit cards!

Additionally, sarah palin is a pretty woman and she'd look great in nice clothes from banana republic or some stores. She doesn't need to spend $150,000 on looking good!

Trust you on a vp candidate is not going to walk into jcpenny's? Well, i know for a fact that obama's family shops at the gap and j.crew's.

Obama's family represents the real middle class.

Thank you!
 
Are you sure you understand the whole issue?

First, Sarah Palin requested new clothings and RNC did not have a problem with that. What RNC did NOT expect was that she went on a shopping spree acting as "Wasilla hillbillies looting Neimus Marcus from coast to coast" and she asked her staff to buy her clothes on their credit cards!

Additionally, Sarah Palin is a pretty woman and she'd look great in nice clothes from Banana Republic or some stores. She doesn't need to spend $150,000 on looking good!

Trust you on a VP candidate is not going to walk into JCPenny's? Well, I know for a fact that Obama's family shops at the Gap and J.Crew's.

Obama's family represents the REAL MIDDLE CLASS.

:gpost:

I think it's hilarious that the GOP spent over $150,000 on Palin and yet they lost the election. Talk about money well spent. NOT. :lol:
 
Update:

Sarah Palin cleared in pricey-wardrobe-gate: Federal Election Commission (FEC) dismisses complaint

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Tuesday, May 19th 2009, 5:07 PM
Zalubowski/AP

WASHINGTON - The Federal Election Commission has dismissed a complaint over the $150,000-plus designer wardrobe the Republican Party bought to outfit vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the good-government group that filed the complaint, argued that candidates aren't supposed to use donor money for personal expenses such as clothes. The FEC ruled Tuesday that the ban doesn't apply to party money, however.

The Alaska governor was Sen. John McCain's pick for vice president. The purchases from such high-end stores as Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus drew criticism for Palin, the self-described hockey mom.

The Republican National Committee told the commission that party money rather than candidate campaign money was used for the purchases.

"We have no information to the contrary," the FEC wrote in its decision.

The RNC also argued that the shopping spree was allowed under campaign finance rules that let the party spend on behalf of and in coordination with presidential campaigns.

The RNC spent at least $150,000 on designer clothing, accessories and hair and makeup services for Palin after she became McCain's running mate in September. The high-end duds contrasted with the down-to-earth image that Palin and the campaign sought to craft for her.

The purchases included $75,062 worth at Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis; $49,425 at Saks Fifth Avenue; $9,447 at Macy's; and $789 at the luxury retailer Barneys New York. Goods were also bought for Palin family members, such as $4,902 spent at upscale men's store Atelier and $92 at Pacifier, a Minneapolis baby boutique.

Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director, argued that the commission's decision opens the door for political parties to buy lavish wardrobes for candidates to use, and that contributes to the public's cynicism about politicians.

"It's typical of the FEC to never take on anybody for anything," Sloan said. "It seems like the kind of thing they should have come down on, but they seem to think their hands are tied."

The commission in March asked Congress to expand the ban on personal use of campaign funds to include party money, Sloan noted. Congress has yet to act, she said. CREW plans no further action on its commission complaint, Sloan said.

The RNC did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

The controversy over Palin's clothing overshadowed the Republican campaign in the final weeks.

The McCain-Palin campaign said some of the clothing was returned almost immediately because it was the wrong size. After the November election, the RNC sought to get all the items back and planned to return them to the stores or give them to charity.

The McCain campaign and Palin characterized the purchases as legitimate campaign expenses and said there was never any plan for Palin to keep the items.
Sarah Palin cleared in pricey-wardrobe-gate: Federal Election Commission (FEC) dismisses complaint
 
Now some of you finally know what kind of person, Sarah Palin is... :hmm:

I am not surprised because I had no good feeling about her few minutes AFTER learn McCain picked her up as his VP.

I had a naughty feeling :naughty:
 
So? This isn't going to redeem Palin in the eyes of most Americans.
Who said she needs to be redeemed "in the eyes of most Americans?" What's wrong with posting updates to threads?
 
This is appalling:

"One aide estimated that she spent "tens of thousands" more than the reported $150,000, and that $20,000 to $40,000 went to buy clothes for her husband. Some articles of clothing have apparently been lost. An angry aide characterized the shopping spree as "Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast," and said the truth will eventually come out when the Republican Party audits its books."

Highlights: Newsweek's Special Election Project | Newsweek Politics: Campaign 2008 | Newsweek.com

How could she do this to her own party?!?! $40,000 to her husband's clothing and they "lost" some clothes?!?!

Not only this, there's tension:

"McCain himself rarely spoke to Palin during the campaign, and aides kept him in the dark about the details of her spending on clothes because they were sure he would be offended. Palin asked to speak along with McCain at his Arizona concession speech Tuesday night, but campaign strategist Steve Schmidt vetoed the request."

This truly shows how reckless Palin is and I am SOOOO happy she lost!

Only idiots still stand behind her.

Palin has killed defenseless wolves pups and shoot wolves from a helicopter for fun! She made me sick!
 
What's wrong with posting updates to threads?

The problem with posting this kind of an "update" is that it looks like you are trying to change people's minds (i.e. ADers) about Palin.
 
The problem with posting this kind of an "update" is that it looks like you are trying to change people's minds (i.e. ADers) about Palin.
Maybe that's the way you see it. I see it as an update to a news story. Posting the news shouldn't bother anyone.
 
Posting the news shouldn't bother anyone.

Neither should having a discussion about Palin long after the election has ended. (In one thread concerning Palin, you questioned why ADers were continuing to talk about her since the election was over.) If it is acceptable to do A, it should also be acceptable to do B.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top