Liza
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2003
- Messages
- 4,355
- Reaction score
- 3
If it is a non original human, I really don't think they have. Just my opinion.
What about being pro-life... shouldn't all humans be protected and have rights, cloned or not?
If it is a non original human, I really don't think they have. Just my opinion.
Would cloned humans have a soul?
What about being pro-life... shouldn't all humans be protected and have rights, cloned or not?
If you are able, what do you think about the health insurance, will it be pricey or cheaper cause you have clones now?
Hmm, so if we are so easily replacable.. then the value on life would be less?
Liza said:What about being pro-life... shouldn't all humans be protected and have rights, cloned or not?
Well, I don't trust cloned humans...

why not? it's 100% same as human.... it's just that they were born differently![]()
I don't think so.
My reason on this: No Human Cloning!
I'm tryin' to find a several to support my reasons...
lol..... that site is created by anti-abortionists. The big reason why some people don't like cloning/stem cell is because it involves abortion process. oh well.....
Just Say No To Human Cloning | The Center for Public JusticeAs scientists pointed out at the hearing, cloning research is not yet dependable. A human clone would carry genes from only one parent, not both as in normal reproduction. That fact alone raises questions aplenty. Two monkeys that were cloned represented only a small percentage of the 59 embryos transferred to surrogate mothers. The Scottish sheep cloning experiment turned out even worse: only one lamb survived out of 277 embryos.
. As for cloning body parts - why not? I'm 100% up for it.don't worry. Cloning is a very broad issue. This thread is going to get all over. Cloning human being..... cloning human body part.... cloning a pet.... cloning agricultural animals... etc.
I don't think we'll ever get to cloning a WHOLE human. Stick to old fashioned way, please. As for cloning body parts - why not? I'm 100% up for it.
Yep. That would be fine if it's about saving humans' lives.![]()
I just disagreed with idea of cloned pets and food, espeically cloned humans.
I don't think we'll ever get to cloning human beings ever. It's banned and unethical. I'm sure in a few hundred years later - some twisted defense contractors or a government will clone humans to produce soldiers. Again - cloning human being is nearly impossible, too costly, and too difficult. Genetic Engineering is a logical choice. It's lot less riskier and cheaper than cloning human beings out of test tubes. Just gather bunch of women aka "sex slaves" or "human incubators" and have them give birth to genetically-enhanced babies.
Cloning can be a great success for those who can't have babies or those who don't want to carry babies. Simply infuse the dad's DNA and mom's DNA and ask if they want a black or white baby.
Whatcha think?
why? we already have that. it's called IVF (In vitro fertilization). As for infertile spouse - sorry tough luck but there's something called adoption.
That's like an low level of creating babies.
What about 2 white parents with black pride wants a black baby, can IVF do that?