- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
You know, I feel like theres a very simple, straightforward question thats been asked here and people are finding many creative ways to avoid giving a simple, straightforward answer.
Like?
You know, I feel like theres a very simple, straightforward question thats been asked here and people are finding many creative ways to avoid giving a simple, straightforward answer.
Not really. Since the electoral college is taken by state....each vote within a state counts the same. But of course I was not discussing presidential elections in the first place
Ok by me dear, it was you that brought up the electoral college
I have a question, too. For all of those that are so certain that homosexuality does not have a biological basis (because then you would be denying rights based on a biological difference in the same way that this country once denied rights based on racial and gender differences)...have any of you managed to read and evaluate the studies on discordant and concordant rates of homosexuality in twin studies? How about the prevalence rate based on a familial link through a paternal uncle? Have you managed to get ahold of and read the studies on the effects of andogen exposure prenatally?
Like?
...By the way, Sunny, when your brother does marry his partner, I hope you'll post about it on here. I'll send out a toast to their happiness
We are talking about it in terms of social justice and the probability of it being a reality in the very near future for residents of all states. But, you have once again mispoken, because there are states in which gay marriage is indeed a reality. In fact, there are entire countries where it is a reality.
The states which endorse gay marriage do not provide a license of civil union. They provide a marriage license. Your attempt at semantic games has backfired on you.
Pretty far off topic.....Perhaps you should start a thread
Dare you to put the issue before ALL VOTERS in America. It will backfire on you.
BTW: It was not put before ALL VOTERS in Canada
People have repeatedly asked how gay marriage being legalized would harm those who disagree with it. I might've missed something, but I've yet to see a real answer to that.
December 17!
People have repeatedly asked how gay marriage being legalized would harm those who disagree with it. I might've missed something, but I've yet to see a real answer to that.
I want to live in a country that values all people equally.
It isn't off topic at all. It is regarding the biological causes of homosexual orientation. It has already been discussed in this thread in numerous posts. And since people are using moral reasoning to deny a right to those with a homosexual orientation, how does it fit morally to deny a right to another based on a biological difference? A.G. Bell proposed denying marriage rights based on biology of the deaf. No one thinks that is a moral stand to take. So why is denial of the rights to another population with a biological difference okay? See...very much on topic.
I don't think you're the only one either.
I disagree but oh well.....
I want to live in a country that values all people equally.
Then that is how you should vote.
People have repeatedly asked how gay marriage being legalized would harm those who disagree with it. I might've missed something, but I've yet to see a real answer to that.