Yes, I want my daughter to learn to speak. Currently she has learned approximately 150 signs, which was my decision before her doctors agreed. See, she has speech therapy and we also have a Kaufman Apraxia Kit that I purchased. When we would work on these words, she would finally be able to sound them out, but would not apply them to everyday conversation. Once she learned the sign for those words, she used the signs as cues to speak them as well. Then she began using them in conversations along with the signs. After having such success with those few signs, I finally had proof for her physicians that this could possibly help her for more than just communicating. Her reading skills are lower than other children her age, but she is working very hard to improve that. But, when she does focus on correct English in her sentences, she knows the correct way. Her receptive language is fine. The reason I don't feel she should learn SEE is basically the same reason others have already said. She hears and understands English. It's only being able to communicate that poses a problem.
As far as the statement "We were at fault" I was referring to the physicians opinion. But, then again, he thought she chose NOT to talk, which was not the case at all. I don't feel like we have caused apraxia nor do I feel like we have hendered her speaking. I honestly feel like if we hadn't experimented on our own agains the doctor's advice, she would still be at the same level she was a year ago. She first learned the alphabet in sign, naturally. She struggled with memorizing the names of them. She learned the signs for the alphabet within one week as well as the names. It was amazing. I think signing promotes her speaking. In a sense, I guess it works for her as Cued speech in her own way. I have seen her self-esteem improve greatly as well.
We have contacted St. Rita for her to attend part time classes. Yes, I have heard they are an excellent school. I really don't want her to go full time. I just want her to socialize with other children who communicate using sign. She absolutely loves childrens stories and videos that are signed. I believe it makes her feel as if she isn't alone. The doctor's have said that with apraxia as severe as hers, it may be very difficult for her to be able to carry on a complete conversation by speech with a stranger. Now, with family yes, but not those who don't know her.
I am really surprised at all the responses I have received over this matter. You all have given me much to think about. Thanks!
As far as the statement "We were at fault" I was referring to the physicians opinion. But, then again, he thought she chose NOT to talk, which was not the case at all. I don't feel like we have caused apraxia nor do I feel like we have hendered her speaking. I honestly feel like if we hadn't experimented on our own agains the doctor's advice, she would still be at the same level she was a year ago. She first learned the alphabet in sign, naturally. She struggled with memorizing the names of them. She learned the signs for the alphabet within one week as well as the names. It was amazing. I think signing promotes her speaking. In a sense, I guess it works for her as Cued speech in her own way. I have seen her self-esteem improve greatly as well.
We have contacted St. Rita for her to attend part time classes. Yes, I have heard they are an excellent school. I really don't want her to go full time. I just want her to socialize with other children who communicate using sign. She absolutely loves childrens stories and videos that are signed. I believe it makes her feel as if she isn't alone. The doctor's have said that with apraxia as severe as hers, it may be very difficult for her to be able to carry on a complete conversation by speech with a stranger. Now, with family yes, but not those who don't know her.
I am really surprised at all the responses I have received over this matter. You all have given me much to think about. Thanks!
