Govt of Alaska: Sarah Palin is Vice-President with McCain

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have admit that Sarah Palin and his husband is very nice, also same with their kids as well but views of Srah Palin doesn't meet my exception, especially on support of drilling on oil in offshore and AK and gay rights.

I made mistake to support on drilling of oil in offshore and AK after refresh about happened to massive oil spill in AK in 1989, known as Exxon Valdez and we don't learn an mistake about happened in 1989, also we don't want happen like that again, also reserve of oil in ANWR is very limited when compared to Canada and middle east, it will last for 3 years if all replaced from import oil. If congress want lift the ban for drilling and when oil spill is happen again then I would out of job to prevent of spend my taxes on clean up of stupid oil spill, even it must be all fault for oil companies to cause any spill, massive oil spill cause skyrocket of CO2 and more threat to wildlife.

I rather to support subsidizes on oil or energy cost, increase of mpg in vehicles and find other energy source, such as renewable energy like hydrogen.
 
Pacman said:
...I made mistake to support on drilling of oil in offshore and AK after refresh about happened to massive oil spill in AK in 1989, known as Exxon Valdez and we don't learn an mistake about happened in 1989, also we don't want happen like that again, also reserve of oil in ANWR is very limited when compared to Canada and middle east, it will last for 3 years if all replaced from import oil. If congress want lift the ban for drilling and when oil spill is happen again then I would out of job to prevent of spend my taxes on clean up of stupid oil spill, even it must be all fault for oil companies to cause any spill, massive oil spill cause skyrocket of CO2 and more threat to wildlife.
Click to expand...
The Exxon Valdez was a tanker ship accident. It was not an oil drilling or pipeline accident. We did learn from that, and things have been changed. That was almost 20 years ago; have there been any more similar accidents in that area since then? Look up the updated information.

I rather to support subsidizes on oil or energy cost, increase of mpg in vehicles and find other energy source, such as renewable energy like hydrogen.
Click to expand...
Other sources of energy and conservation are available and should be promoted, yes. But they aren't a 100 percent substitute for oil. We will still need lots of petroleum.
 
Reba said:
The Exxon Valdez was a tanker ship accident. It was not an oil drilling or pipeline accident. We did learn from that, and things have been changed. That was almost 20 years ago; have there been any more similar accidents in that area since then? Look up the updated information.


Other sources of energy and conservation are available and should be promoted, yes. But they aren't a 100 percent substitute for oil. We will still need lots of petroleum.
Click to expand...

Ok, I ask you a question about 5 years later.

If congress lift the ban for drilling in offshore or AK so successfully then gas price isn't going down so successfully in 5 years later but priced at $10 per gal?

I'm blame on excessive demand of oil from oversea, such as China and India. :o
 
Reba said:
The Exxon Valdez was a tanker ship accident. It was not an oil drilling or pipeline accident. We did learn from that, and things have been changed. That was almost 20 years ago; have there been any more similar accidents in that area since then? Look up the updated information.
Click to expand...

The updated information is.... That Exxon Valdez was later renamed to CONDOLEEZZA RICE. My professor was surprised to see that tanker being repaired, re-painted, and renamed at Alaska harbor when he vacationed there to write his book. After much controversy, it was quietly renamed to Altair Voyage... or was it Exxon Mediterranean.

Pakistan-American-Puppet8nov07.jpg
 
jiro123 said:
The updated information is.... That Exxon Valdez was later renamed to CONDOLEEZZA RICE. My professor was surprised to see that tanker being repaired, re-painted, and renamed at Alaska harbor when he vacationed there to write his book. After much controversy, it was quietly renamed to Altair Voyage... or was it Exxon Mediterranean.

Pakistan-American-Puppet8nov07.jpg
Click to expand...

From one national disaster to another.:giggle:
 
Liebling:-))) said:
It could be that I miss her speech over healthcare, education etc...? Can you please correct me about her speech about healthcare, education, economy, etc in her speech because I may miss it?
Click to expand...
McCain covered most of those Thursday night (it's generally the Pres candidate that covers that stuff, not the VP). McCain spoke about healthcare the week before the RNC. I was disappointed he didn't mention it during his RNC speech, because it is a really good idea.

Give every American (or perhaps it was American family, I forget) a $5000 refundable tax credit for the purposes of purchasing your own health insurance - whichever health insurance you choose for yourself (hey, talk about personal freedom). That way you see the doctor you want to see, not the one the gov't tells you to go see.

I really think this might be an excellent option. It keeps healthcare privatized (which is important due to the fact that capitalist competition is the reason such a vast amount [dare I say a majority?] of major medical advances occur in the US) which will be to everyone's benefit. It also allows for the government-funded healthcare that liberals so dearly want, but keeps it out of the hands of the immensely incompetent and inefficient government program it would otherwise wont to be.

And if someone choses to not buy healthcare with that $5000, so be it. It isn't the government's job to cradle you like an infant and protect you from your own stupidity. True freedom also means taking responsibility for the choices you make.

To my view, she spent her time disrespecting and misleading than positive something about American values. She is no good to American values...
Click to expand...
It's fairly common that the VP speech at both conventions is an attack dog speech. I thought she did it with a lot of humor and class.
 
ksbsnowowl said:
McCain covered most of those Thursday night (it's generally the Pres candidate that covers that stuff, not the VP). McCain spoke about healthcare the week before the RNC. I was disappointed he didn't mention it during his RNC speech, because it is a really good idea.

Give every American (or perhaps it was American family, I forget) a $5000 refundable tax credit for the purposes of purchasing your own health insurance - whichever health insurance you choose for yourself (hey, talk about personal freedom). That way you see the doctor you want to see, not the one the gov't tells you to go see.

I really think this might be an excellent option. It keeps healthcare privatized (which is important due to the fact that capitalist competition is the reason such a vast amount [dare I say a majority?] of major medical advances occur in the US) which will be to everyone's benefit. It also allows for the government-funded healthcare that liberals so dearly want, but keeps it out of the hands of the immensely incompetent and inefficient government program it would otherwise wont to be.

And if someone choses to not buy healthcare with that $5000, so be it. It isn't the government's job to cradle you like an infant and protect you from your own stupidity. True freedom also means taking responsibility for the choices you make.

It's fairly common that the VP speech at both conventions is an attack dog speech. I thought she did it with a lot of humor and class.
Click to expand...

Actaully, McCain's plan would be up toa $5000 tax credit, which is still going to keep the system stratified. Not all citizens will receive $5000 toward health insurance.

Obama's plan does not create a system where by health care is not privatized. His plan for converage is not a universal health care system, as his opponents continue to label it. It provides insurance coverage for those who are currently uninsured. Those who are currently insured will not be affected. If you have health insurance now you will continue to participate in the same plan. If you don't have health insurance, a plan will be made available to you at a cost you can afford.

Anyone whose health isurance is an HMO or a PPO is already restricted regarding the health care provider they can use. That is a feature of the HMO and PPO that presumably keeps costs down. Unfortunately, it also serves to reduce the quality of care received.

Frankly, I didn't see much from the RNC in way of actual information, and neither did the analysts. More circumventing of issues, personal attacks that raise the emotional response, but do nothing to inform the voter of a particular plan, no information on economic issues, and a lot of biographical hoopla that is not pertinent.
 
jillio said:
Actaully, McCain's plan would be up to a $5000 tax credit, which is still going to keep the system stratified. Not all citizens will receive $5000 toward health insurance.
Click to expand...
Source, please.

Here's mine.

John McCain Will Reform The Tax Code To Offer More Choices Beyond Employer-Based Health Insurance Coverage. While still having the option of employer-based coverage, every family will receive a direct refundable tax credit - effectively cash - of $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families to offset the cost of insurance. Families will be able to choose the insurance provider that suits them best and the money would be sent directly to the insurance provider. Those obtaining innovative insurance that costs less than the credit can deposit the remainder in expanded Health Savings Accounts.
Click to expand...
Nothing about "up to" - a straight amount. $2500 per individual, or $5000 per family.

Obama's plan ... provides insurance coverage for those who are currently uninsured. Those who are currently insured will not be affected.
Click to expand...
Then it seems McCain has the upper hand, as any of your family's tax credit that you don't use goes to you as HSA funds, which will save you on copays and drug costs. If you happen to have a job with good benefits, God forbid, you still get to use your tax benefit.

McCain's plan also allows currently uninsured individuals to get and afford insurance. Looks like McCain's plan is a winner.
 
ksbsnowowl said:
Source, please.

Here's mine.

Nothing about "up to" - a straight amount. $2500 per individual, or $5000 per family.

Then it seems McCain has the upper hand, as any of your family's tax credit that you don't use goes to you as HSA funds, which will save you on copays and drug costs. If you happen to have a job with good benefits, God forbid, you still get to use your tax benefit.

McCain's plan also allows currently uninsured individuals to get and afford insurance. Looks like McCain's plan is a winner.
Click to expand...

I agree with jillio, not every citizens could get like that and McCain's plan is more stirred up (messed up) when compare to Obama's plan, I prefer Obama's plan over McCain.

Jillio will provide the source of link when she will reply soon.
 
ksbsnowowl said:
Source, please.

Here's mine.

Nothing about "up to" - a straight amount. $2500 per individual, or $5000 per family.

Then it seems McCain has the upper hand, as any of your family's tax credit that you don't use goes to you as HSA funds, which will save you on copays and drug costs. If you happen to have a job with good benefits, God forbid, you still get to use your tax benefit.

McCain's plan also allows currently uninsured individuals to get and afford insurance. Looks like McCain's plan is a winner.
Click to expand...

I don't need to provide a link...yours supports my statement quite nicely. $2500 per individual up to $5000 per family. Looks like families are coming up on the short end of the stick on that one, despite McClain's claim of family values.

The money will not be a direct reimbursement, but will be sent direrctly to the insurance company. That puts the government directly in the business of providing health care. This comes closer to universal health care and socialist structuring than does Obama's plan. So, if you want the government involved to that degree in health care, I guess McCain is your man. I prefer to have a choice when it comes to health care and insurance.

And, with Obama's economic plan, the tax benefits for the poor and the middle class are far greater than those of McCain's health care tax break. So Obama's plan still is on top when it comes to providing benefits to the majority of people who make up this country.

McCain's plan wins only if you have your head in the sand. He hasn't even given a straight forward rundown of economic issues, and in fact, has used some sneaky diversionary tactics to attempt to lure the public away from realizing that he has provided absolutley no answers regarding the state of the economy and how his plan will fix it. Hey, look over here!
 
PowerON said:
His quote said "I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care"

LIAR, his plan leaves us all to pay the 15,000,000 who don’t have to buy it.
Click to expand...

You are misinformed. And the quote above is not anywhere in the link you provided.
 
PowerON said:
I'm sorry dear, it's belong to Hillary Clintons gave the straight fact on health over Obama. Unfortunately, it seem the source, I tried look for, she make these remove. As the original was from Feb 2008.

UPDATE: okay, I found one... *shurg*
Campaign Takeout: Barack's health care ad is bull, says Hillary
Click to expand...

It was no doubt removed because it was innacurrate. And that quote is not anywhere in this link, either. Likewise, you might want to keep in mind that Clinton lost to Obama, and now supports him and his plan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top