No, I somehow feel the real intent was to make this public is to either, from highest priority to least (from my opinion):
- Get me banned.
- Perma-banned, I realize this because I asked if this was other member's intent, and no reply came from it. The moderation team questioned a permanent ban status as well.
- Warned again over something already addressed and handled.
- Specifically tailored to have me come out to speak. (COULD have completely been solved in a simple PM.)
- "Address" the rest of AD over my actions.
- "Prove" something about me? <- ???
- Jump against Alex for not even really doing anything?
Look at the etiquette post to garner an opinion about the last post.
I specifically did not reply to this member's pointing of fingers at me previously due to letting them have a chance to explain. Now when they want to take it one step further, I felt the need to jump in, and it seems that I am not allowed to have a chance to explain myself
even though I've let said member speak for as much as he wanted, and the P M button to my name was always available.
The member very well knows he wants to state my name, but avoided using it in the initial post. However, from yesterday's post one can immediately draw a relation between that post and this post to find the user mentioned.
My personal view on this:
This whole thing jumped out of some random misunderstanding that the original poster again, overreacted and did not understand what was happening.
I let the original poster have a chance to explain and discuss it privately. But he chose not to.
PS. Jillio: You
very well know what was Jiro's point in his last post. I didn't even realize until he posted that spreading the contents of a PM was against AD rules, had I not known I would have said that earlier.
Honestly, there is no line between mentioning the contents and pasting the exact message, because it is still crossing the line that one is very well aware of.
Second. to correct that, I never said the mods acted unfairly. I questioned what you thought of a member that was banned.
Here's my PM's for reference. Since it's my own PMs, I am entitled freely to paste them so:
From : naisho
To : jillio
Date : 2009-02-21 15:09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Jillio,
What'd you think about the stalker topic yesterday?
From : naisho
To : jillio
Date : 2009-02-21 15:12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Jillio's post cut off)
I see. Do you think that particular stalker should be permabanned no matter whomever s/he was?
From : naisho
To : jillio
Date : 2009-02-21 15:16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Jillio's quote cut off)
I understand. Thank you for input and I'm sorry to interrupt you.
.
for paste Jolie´s post over here to get my attention.
