Only a Quarter of Parents to Deaf Kids Know Sign Language

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,164
Reaction score
5
Only a Quarter of Parents to Deaf Kids Know Sign Language - Softpedia

New studies have revealed that the vast majority of parents to deaf children do not learn to become fluid in sign language. Their proportion can reach about 75 percent, which means that their children do not get the appropriate amount of communication at home.

No one can blame the parents though, given the difficulty of learning American Sign Language (ASL). Experts say that studying it is equivalent to a native English speaker learning Japanese from scratch.

As such, even though most parents do learn ASL, 75 percent of them never become fluent in communicating with their kids using it. This situation is catastrophic, researchers say.

“So that means only 25 percent of the kids are really getting good sign language at home. They're so behind in learning the language that they're not really learning the lessons in school,” explains scientist Thad Starner.

The expert holds an appointment as a computer scientist and professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). He is one of the experts behind interactive software such as CopyCat.

These are programs that allow young deaf children to learn ASL with relative ease, by mimicking what goes on on the screen in front of them. Such tools make learning sign language easier.

Starner's efforts were supported with grant money from the US National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Education (DE) Institute of Education Sciences.

Another software the expert helped develop is called “SmartSign,” and is basically a phone application that allows people who get jammed on signing a word to get the hints they need.

Users simply speak the word they forgot how to sign into the mouthpiece, and then a person appears on their phone screen, signing the word the users were looking for.

Parents who have had a chance to use SmartSign say that this is of great use to them. It allows them to get past temporary memory lapses, and avoid leaving their kids with an interrogatory expression on their faces.

The truth is that, no matter how many of these children there are, people prefer to turn a blind eye to them. This is also true for many research agencies and governments.

But some investigators soldier on, producing innovation that at least improve the life of deaf people considerably by taking care of the little things.

Further improvements in the software are expected to take place soon, and the NSF will continue to support this line of research.
 
Yep...sad, too. No wonder the kids are behind in education and knowledge of life.
 
Yep and the teachers and the Deaf schools get the blame...what a joke!
 
It is only a problem if the children are using sign and the parents don't know it. If the child is successfully oral, why would the family need to use sign? I think the groups need to be seperated.
 
It is only a problem if the children are using sign and the parents don't know it. If the child is successfully oral, why would the family need to use sign? I think the groups need to be seperated.

I was oral and I was still left out in my environment 24/7! U just do not get it, do you?
 
I was oral and I was still left out in my environment 24/7! U just do not get it, do you?

My point is that it is not a "tragedy" that parents can't sign if their kids don't know or use sign. It isn't that they aren't able to communicate, that the child is suffering and unable to understand or express themselves with their family. They just communicate in a language that ISN'T ASL.
 
My point is that it is not a "tragedy" that parents can't sign if their kids don't know or use sign. It isn't that they aren't able to communicate, that the child is suffering and unable to understand or express themselves with their family. They just communicate in a language that ISN'T ASL.

If the child is successfully oral, why would the family need to use sign?

This what I was referring to...

Maybe these kids are oral but still suffer being left out in their environmet. I still see kids like that constantly being referred and many of my friends who work at other deaf programs say the same thing.

I know I know...there are a whole bunch of excuses so no need to go over them again.
 
Wirelessly posted

faire_jour said:
It is only a problem if the children are using sign and the parents don't know it. If the child is successfully oral, why would the family need to use sign? I think the groups need to be seperated.

There you go. -__-

If the oral-only path is success and ASL sucks, then it is better to delete one whole language is ASL, isn't it? If you think ASL or sign languages "hurt" deaf children, then there is NO reason to allow hearing babies to learn the baby sign language. There is NO reason to allow deaf children who are from different countries to learn any sign language (never mind those successful Sweden kids, they're full of lies and oral-only is only one best! Yay!)

Never mind that, in fact, normal people think English and spoken language are more important than all languages and signings too. Uh, yeah. Thank G-d for English speakers!

Lets say this... You support forcing deaf kids to be normal. Admit it already. :)
 
If the child is successfully oral, why would the family need to use sign?

This what I was referring to...

Maybe these kids are oral but still suffer being left out in their environmet. I still see kids like that constantly being referred and many of my friends who work at other deaf programs say the same thing.

I know I know...there are a whole bunch of excuses so no need to go over them again.

Here is my question, if a child can hear and understand speech (that is how I would define successfully oral, among other things) HOW are they being left out?
 
Here is my question, if a child can hear and understand speech (that is how I would define successfully oral, among other things) HOW are they being left out?


Really?
 
Wirelessly posted



There you go. -__-

If the oral-only path is success and ASL sucks, then it is better to delete one whole language is ASL, isn't it? If you think ASL or sign languages "hurt" deaf children, then there is NO reason to allow hearing babies to learn the baby sign language. There is NO reason to allow deaf children who are from different countries to learn any sign language (never mind those successful Sweden kids, they're full of lies and oral-only is only one best! Yay!)

Never mind that, in fact, normal people think English and spoken language are more important than all languages and signings too. Uh, yeah. Thank G-d for English speakers!

Lets say this... You support forcing deaf kids to be normal. Admit it already. :)

WTF?? Where did I say ANY of those things? Yes, I believe that the language of the majority is important, and that is spoken English. I happen to believe that ASL is nothing but a benefit to all children with a hearing loss, and I chose to raise my child with ASL as her first language and spoken English as her second.

BUT, that is NOT the choice that everyone makes. And how can you find fault with a parent not knowing ASL if their child doesn't use it? If they intend for their child to use ASL, they need to work their butts off to become fluent so they can ALWAYS communicate with their child. If they decide to not use ASL, they need to be damned sure that their child has complete access to spoken language through listening and keep a constant eye on their child's language development to be sure they it is continuing to make appropriate progress so that the child doesn't suffer from language delays.
 
WTF?? Where did I say ANY of those things? Yes, I believe that the language of the majority is important, and that is spoken English. I happen to believe that ASL is nothing but a benefit to all children with a hearing loss, and I chose to raise my child with ASL as her first language and spoken English as her second.

BUT, that is NOT the choice that everyone makes. And how can you find fault with a parent not knowing ASL if their child doesn't use it? If they intend for their child to use ASL, they need to work their butts off to become fluent so they can ALWAYS communicate with their child. If they decide to not use ASL, they need to be damned sure that their child has complete access to spoken language through listening and keep a constant eye on their child's language development to be sure they it is continuing to make appropriate progress so that the child doesn't suffer from language delays.

Too bad it isnt the case for all families who chose not to go with the ASL route. Not every family is you. Mine wasnt and neither were several of my friends'.
 
Seriously. If you can hear and understand what people are saying, how are you left out? Dead serious question.

Really? So then they are hearing kids, arent they?

We arent talking about hearing kids. We are talking about deaf/hoh kids.
 
Wirelessly posted

Well, then why you said it?

Because it sounds like your posts said "See? ASL don't work. Almost everyone is speaking, why signing?"
 
Too bad it isnt the case for all families who chose not to go with the ASL route. Not every family is you. Mine wasnt and neither were several of my friends'.

And not every family is yours....There are VERY dedicated, responsible families who make informed decisions that are best for their child.
 
And not every family is yours....There are VERY dedicated, responsible families who make informed decisions that are best for their child.

That doesnt mean the problem isnt still there so are you saying "Who cares about these kids like me and many others as long as there are some families like yours?" Is that what you are implying?
 
Back
Top