Zachary Wyatt, GOP Missouri Lawmaker, Says He Is Gay, Denounces 'Don't Say Gay' Bill

Foxrac

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
44,471
Reaction score
448
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A Republican Missouri House member who previously served in the U.S. Air Force publicly announced Wednesday that he is gay and called upon GOP leaders in the state Legislature to withdraw a bill that would limit discussion of sexual orientation in public schools.

Rep. Zachary Wyatt, a 27-year-old cattle farmer from the rural northern Missouri town of Novinger, said the legislation had motivated him to disclose his sexual orientation publicly for the first time. Wyatt was joined by nine other Democratic and Republican lawmakers in denouncing Missouri legislation that would prohibit teaching, extracurricular activities or materials that discuss sexual orientation, unless they relate to the scientific facts about human reproduction.

"I will not lie to myself anymore about my own sexuality," Wyatt said during a news conference at the state Capitol. "I am still the same person that I was when I woke up this morning and I will be the same person when I go to bed tonight. Today I ask you to stand with me as a proud Republican, a proud veteran and a proud gay man who wants to protect all kids addressing bullying in our schools."

Wyatt is not running for re-election in Missouri, because he plans to move to Hawaii and study marine biology.

A spokesman for the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, a national group that backs gay, lesbian, bisexual and transsexual candidate, said Wyatt is the only openly gay Republican in the nation who is currently serving in a state legislature. Other gay Republicans have served in state legislatures in the past. Two other members of the Missouri House, both Democrats from urban areas, are openly homosexual. One Democratic Missouri state senator is also openly lesbian.

The Missouri bill appears unlikely to pass before the session ends May 18. It was referred to a House education committee last month and has not received a hearing. But the legislation has generated attention and controversy. Comedian Stephen Colbert recently mocked it on his cable TV show.

Opponents have dubbed the legislation the "don't say gay" bill. They contend it could forbid teachers from uttering the words "gay" or "lesbian" in the classroom or talking about bullying that gay and lesbian students face from their peers. The legislation also appears to forbid school-sponsored "gay-straight alliance" groups, which advocate for gay and lesbian rights.

The lawmakers at Wednesday's news conference called for the sponsor of the bill to withdraw the legislation.

But Rep. Steve Cookson said he won't do that. Cookson, a Republican from the rural southern Missouri town of Fairdealing, said he believes parents and family members, not schools, should teach children about different kinds of sexuality.

"Those are personal issues that probably should be taught by people outside the school system," he said. "We need to be focusing on what is going to provide students with the skills they need to be productive citizens in our society."

Cookson insisted his bill does not explicitly ban the mention of specific words. He did not say whether he intends to ban school-sponsored "gay-straight alliance" groups.

"I think we're headed into some very tricky waters there," Cookson said. "There could be all kinds of different groups that could want to be sponsored by a school, and some of them you may think are good groups and some of them you may think are bad groups."

Zachary Wyatt, GOP Missouri Lawmaker, Says He Is Gay, Denounces 'Don't Say Gay' Bill
 
Wow, what's shocking news about GOP politician came out to be gay.

Don't say gay bill is just silly...
 
The elementary school classroom is no place to have this kind of discussion. To many I'm sure it would be no different from some one teaching the Bible in the public schools! It is the parents job to educate their children about these issues. Fair is fair.
 
The elementary school classroom is no place to have this kind of discussion. To many I'm sure it would be no different from some one teaching the Bible in the public schools! It is the parents job to educate their children about these issues. Fair is fair.

In some states, teaching bibles are allowed as curriculum classes and some teachers can cited some stuff from bible book as part of teaching.

No different when they discuss about gay people.

The public school in CA required teachers to teach about gay rights.

If you don't like it then send your children to religious private school.
 
This is why my children were home schooled!

Good for you and don't blame on gay communities for those crap.

It is possible for your children to learn about GLBT from somewhere else like I did.

I graduated from public school and had went to inner city school as child.
 
I guess the public schools have so much spare time during the day that teaching the students academics doesn't use up all that time. They have to find other subjects to fill up that time, so they want to get involved with teaching all kinds of sex subjects. I'm sure the teachers will be thrilled with this.
 
I guess the public schools have so much spare time during the day that teaching the students academics doesn't use up all that time. They have to find other subjects to fill up that time, so they want to get involved with teaching all kinds of sex subjects. I'm sure the teachers will be thrilled with this.

That's not true and they don't have much spare time to teach. The school hours are only 6 hours so elementary school usually teach spelling, math, english, social studies/history and science. I don't learn about sex until I got in high school so they are part of science, especially Anatomy and gay culture are covered on history/social studies.

All teachers are required to teach materials that required by state to cover on state exam, especially CAHSEE and if majority of students fail the state exam so teachers will be suspicious for not cover any materials that required by state.
 
I guess the public schools have so much spare time during the day that teaching the students academics doesn't use up all that time. They have to find other subjects to fill up that time, so they want to get involved with teaching all kinds of sex subjects. I'm sure the teachers will be thrilled with this.

I was thinking the same thing. Who cares about math, right. Let's teach about the bedroom instead. The left (I realize this guy is "GOP" )seems to be saying "Get out of our bedrooom....but we still want to give your kids the details."
 
Long time ago, We had learned the sex education (one week course) in the elementary school. Talking about sex made us giggle and we were kids. My teacher thought that it would make us feel comfortable, so we can ask serious questions. It worked. I keep in contact with my teacher who is a principal now.
 
I was thinking the same thing. Who cares about math, right. Let's teach about the bedroom instead. The left (I realize this guy is "GOP" )seems to be saying "Get out of our bedrooom....but we still want to give your kids the details."

I think you are just silly.

Math is strictly required to teach at public school and they are not waived or substitute with other courses.
 
Young children do not need to be exposed to such things. They are far too impressionable to understand or make their own choices in matters like this. They need to be taught the basics, reading, writing, math, science & history. But alas our science and history books have already been rewritten since many of us were kids. The truth altered or removed in many cases. I really don't mind sex education in the classroom like we had when we were young. It was more of a anatomy and science lesson than speaking about alternate lifestyles and sexual content that kids don't need to know about in elementary schools.

Let's make solving unemployment, education, the economy and healthcare more of a priority in our government than talking about whether or not we are gay or straight! What a true waste of time and money! :mad:
 
Young children do not need to be exposed to such things. They are far too impressionable to understand or make their own choices in matters like this. They need to be taught the basics, reading, writing, math, science & history. But alas our science and history books have already been rewritten since many of us were kids. The truth altered or removed in many cases. I really don't mind sex education in the classroom like we had when we were young. It was more of a anatomy and science lesson than speaking about alternate lifestyles and sexual content that kids don't need to know about in elementary schools.

Let's make solving unemployment, education, the economy and healthcare more of a priority in our government than talking about whether or not we are gay or straight! What a true waste of time and money! :mad:

Calm down, I don't have problem about children to being taught about gay lifestyle or gay culture, especially in social studies and it will help for them to understand instead of bullying. I had seen MANY MANY bullying that related to GLBT issues and need to be stopped. I learned about gay things when I was 7 years old, even it wasn't from school, just learned from other people.

At overall, that's your opinion and I consider GLBT rights as huge issue for political because there are many GLBT people suffered from discrimination and need to be stopped.

I'm glad that "Don't Say Gay" bill failed in Missouri.
 
Calm down, I don't have problem about children to being taught about gay lifestyle or gay culture, especially in social studies and it will help for them to understand instead of bullying.
Social studies? Students don't even know the geography or history portions of social studies. They don't need to add on sexual lifestyles to social studies.

I had seen MANY MANY bullying that related to GLBT issues and need to be stopped. I learned about gay things when I was 7 years old, even it wasn't from school, just learned from other people.
You were only 7 years old when you were exposed to "gay things?"
 
Social studies? Students don't even know the geography or history portions of social studies. They don't need to add on sexual lifestyles to social studies.


You were only 7 years old when you were exposed to "gay things?"

I disagree, gay culture (or gay history) is part of social studies and it has already teach for years - look at description of social studies.
Social studies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-20079566.html

Yup...
 
I think you are just silly.

Math is strictly required to teach at public school and they are not waived or substitute with other courses.

Yes math is required....AND important.... but sadly kids are still failing at math because teachers have to focus on so many other things.
 
Yes math is required....AND important.... but sadly kids are still failing at math because teachers have to focus on so many other things.

even at elementary school? If it was high school, I would see difference because one math teacher is responsible to teach full math course instead of teach off course lesson.

It is laughable if math teachers are going teach about gay culture or gay history because they are not belong to math subject.

When I was in math class at high school, we have no free time nor is recess, we get math lessons and homework everyday.
 
Back
Top