Worst honeymoon vacation....ever?

Lukin

New Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
902
Reaction score
5
From honeymoon to hell - Unlucky couple marry on Saturday on fated Carnival cruise...only to become stranded aboard as the ship begins to fall apart

Instead of a romantic wedding at sea, one Texan couple's nuptials has descended into hell because they are currently stranded on the Carnival Triumph cruise ship in the middle of the Gulf of Mexico.

.......

:squint: Photo comment: Stephanie Stevenson and Rob Mowlam married aboard the Carnival Triumph on Saturday - they have spent the first four days of their honeymoon surrounded by human waste and urine soaked carpets :squint:



Read more @ Carnival Triumph cruise ship: From honeymoon to hell - Unlucky couple marry only to become stranded aboard | Mail Online
 
Apparently there were no back up plans in case of engine failure. If our government would focus on this, maybe they would seize Carnival and put Micky Arison out of business.
 
that's why I don't do cruise ship and I don't vacation in cruise ship.
 
Apparently there were no back up plans in case of engine failure. If our government would focus on this, maybe they would seize Carnival and put Micky Arison out of business.

nope. they can't. they have no legal authority in this matter. it's not the same as FAA.
 
I have not ridden on cruises yet.. I don't plan to anyway.
 
We did a 7 day cruise many years ago. It was nice but we would not do it again.

Why can't they drop food on to the ship via helicopter? I would hate to be stranded like that. Sounds gross!!!
 
Poor people, especially, elders, disable people and asthma and more due to running out of medicines
 
I heard on news about cruise stuck!

If im get married somedays i wouldnt allowed get nightmares on honeymoons i wanted have good honeymoon with my boyfriend..
 
next time pee over the rail. also take dumps over rail. whats so hard about that ? I am sure they could rig something up for them to sit on and it just drains out side of ship - just like an outhouse. better then having a cesspool inside the ship.
If they could have a tugboat dispatched, then they also could have had food deleivered. You would think they learned the second time around.
 
We did a 7 day cruise many years ago. It was nice but we would not do it again.

Why can't they drop food on to the ship via helicopter? I would hate to be stranded like that. Sounds gross!!!

they did. but this is a very challenging logistic issue because this cruise ship had over 4,000 people. and I'm sure there was an issue of priority. fixing the generator was a top priority.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/us/carnival-cruise-line-ship-triumph.html?pagewanted=2&hp
15cruise3_inline-popup.jpg


The Coast Guard delivered approximately 3,000 pounds of equipment, including a generator and electrical cables, to the Carnival Triumph cruise ship.
 
next time pee over the rail. also take dumps over rail. whats so hard about that ? I am sure they could rig something up for them to sit on and it just drains out side of ship - just like an outhouse. better then having a cesspool inside the ship.
legal issue. and environmental issue.

with over 4,000 people... that's a massive amount of feces. thousands gallons :ugh: The government and residents certainly wouldn't be happy to hear about thousands gallons of feces being dumped over sea.

http://oceana.org/sites/default/files/o/uploads/Chapter_8.pdf
30,000 gallons of human waste everyday – Cruise ship sewage, sometimes called blackwater, consists mostly of wastewater from toilets. Ships are permitted to dump raw sewage directly into the ocean once they are three miles out from shore, except in Alaska. Treated sewage can be dumped anywhere in the ocean after being treated by either chemical (chlorine) or biological (bacteria) means. Unfortunately, such treatment rarely works on such a large scale. Even where it does work, the chemicals or bacteria used to treat the waste are introduced into the waste stream, and then dumped into the ocean along with the sewage. This creates yet another form of pollution. The U.S. Clean Water Act requires vessels to install and use marine sanitation devices to treat or hold raw sewage and sets limits regarding bacteria levels in sewage released within three nautical miles of shore. Unfortunately, little monitoring is done. Where tests have been conducted, it has found that the devices often do not treat the wastes well enough to meet the standards.

If they could have a tugboat dispatched, then they also could have had food deleivered. You would think they learned the second time around.
tugboat is not a supply ship. it doesn't have equipment or space to carry a large amount of supply. and how do you offload a large amount of supply from tugboat to cruise ship?

it's just much simpler to do it by chopper which was what they did.
 
Where does poop go on an airplane or cruise ship? | Number Two Guide
A Cruise Ship:

An average cruise ship can hold over 3000 passengers, which leads to a lot of waste. According to Woman Health magazine, cruise ships produce on average 210,000 gallons of sewage a week. So, does it just flush out to sea? The short answer is Yes.

Current laws state that a cruise ship needs to be at least 3 nautical miles from land to dump treated sewage, and twelve nautical miles to dump untreated sewage and pulped food waste. However, some ships hold all of the waste and properly dispose of it when they get back to land. By 2010 all cruise ships will be required to have a sewage holding tank or sewage treatment plant to deal with all that crap.

So if you have taken a cruise before, and were not able to hold it while at sea. There is a good chance you have killed a few dolphins! Cruel pooper.

The Dark Side of Cruising: Waste Disposal - Softpedia
For many, going on a cruise is one of the most exotic and romantic things they can do, but environmentalists draw attention to the fact that all wastes produced on cruise ships are evacuated in the oceans.

Modern ships can carry thousands of passengers and numerous crew members, and so it stands to reason that large amounts of wastes are being produced all the time.

Getting rid of them is problematic. Companies operating such cruise ships around the world generally agree that dumping human wastes into the ocean is a bad thing, but make a good point themselves.

They explain that very few ports have the facilities required to ensure waste disposal. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) recently conducted an investigation of cruise ships in the Baltic Sea, and came up with worrying results.

More than half of all vessels passing through this region dump their waste loads into the waters, even if the EEC – an association of cruise ship operators – agreed not to do this anymore back in May 2009.

However, the EEC did mention that this practice will stop only “when certain conditions were met.” Their conditions included having port facilities available at no extra charge.

At this point, two major ports at the Baltic Sea have such installations – Stockholm and Helsinki. The ports of St Petersburg, Tallinn, Riga, Klaipeda, Gdansk, Rostock and Copenhagen still lack such facilities.

According to statistics secured by the WWF, it would appear that the port of Stockholm received 240 cruise ship visits in this season. About 115 of the ships used the waste-disposal facilities.

However, of the vessels that did so, most only dropped small amounts of wastes, which would seem to suggest that most of their loads were dropped in the open oceans.

“The problem is that there are no laws regulating this. Anything like this would have been absolutely unthinkable on land, but just because it is out of sight for most of us, we still let it happen,” explains WWF expert Mattias Rust.

“The cruise companies as well as the cities that receive the ships are making millions on this industry. They both share the responsibility to solve the waste water problem,” he goes on to say.

Ahead of next week's meeting of the International Maritime Organization, which will take place in London, the WWF has released a call that asks for the ban on waste dumping in the open ocean.

The document asks nations participating at the meeting to agree to “ban discharge of sewage from passenger ships and ferries in the Baltic Sea unless it has been sufficiently treated to remove nutrients or delivered to port reception facilities.”

interesting info.
 
Oh wow, does cruise ship has small emergency boats like Titanic used it?
 
enough for 4,000 passengers to escape?

like I said.... of course... required by laws.

Titanic didn't have enough lifeboats for all passengers so....
 
I have not ridden on cruises yet.. I don't plan to anyway.

I was originally supposed go to ride on cruise ship from Miami for our my family's holiday last December but cancelled due to financial issue because of lawsuit with dog bite.

The dog bite's lawsuit is my family's problem, not me.
 
Why Didn’t Carnival Evacuate the Passengers from Its Stricken Cruise Ship? | TIME.com
As the stricken Carnival Triumph is towed back to port in Mobile, Ala., the 3,143 passengers and 1,086 crew members stranded aboard are understandably restless. They’ve been stuck on board the ship since Sunday morning, when a fire in the ship’s engine room knocked out its propulsion system, leaving it stranded in the Gulf of Mexico.

Reports of the passengers’ ordeal over the intervening four days have been harrowing. According to text messages sent to relatives and interviews with people on board, the smell of rotting food abounds. Toilets are backed up, forcing many to go to the bathroom into red biohazard bags. With the air conditioning system offline, the staterooms are too hot to sleep in, and some passengers have reportedly moved their mattresses on deck. Only one dining room has reliable power, according to a statement released by Carnival — where hot coffee and, sporadically, hot food is served.

(MORE: Stricken Cruise Ship Adrift in Gulf of Mexico, Awaiting Tugboats)

But possibly the worst part about the past week for the passengers of the Carnival Triumph is that there’s been no escape. So far, only two passengers have been moved off of the ship: Rachel Alderete, 54, who was in desperate need of emergency kidney dialysis, was transported to the Triumph‘s sister ship, the Carnival Legend, on Tuesday to be taken to Texas for treatment. The following day a second passenger was taken off the ship due to a pre-existing medical condition, Carnival spokesperson Joyce Oliva tells TIME. Both were moved to other Carnival ships that had diverted their courses in order to assist with the rescue mission.

However, these emergency measures only underscore a question on the minds of many observers: why not take all the passengers off the stricken Carnival Triumph?

It turns out, it’s not that simple. Just moving a single passenger is a delicate dance, according to Lieut. Lily Zepeda, Public Affairs Officer for the U.S. Coast Guard District 8, which is coordinating the response to the cruise ship crisis from its New Orleans-based office. The Coast Guard Cutter Vigorous, a 210-foot vessel that was called on to escort the cruise ship just hours after it was disabled, a small boat to courier Alderete from the Triumph to the Legend. “Our small boat would come alongside one of the cruise ships, take the passenger, and then go alongside the other cruise ship and drop the passenger off,” she explains to TIME.

The whole process can take 15 minutes to an hour for just one person, making it an understandably arduous task to move all 4,200 people on board.(One passenger wasn’t even able to make the trip: according to the New York Times, Alderete’s sister was supposed to accompany her but choppy waters prevented her departure.) And that’s assuming everyone is up to the move. Among the passengers are likely many “that are really young, really old — we don’t know the physical fitness of everyone,” says Zepeda. All told, offloading the passengers with the help of the Vigorous could have taken longer than towing the ship back to shore.

(PHOTOS: The Allure of the Oasis, the World’s Second-Largest Cruise Ship)

Still, it couldn’t have been easy for the passengers on board the Triumph to watch as three working Carnival cruise liners stopped by to drop off hot prepared meals and non-perishable food. But unfortunately none of the ships in the area had enough cabins to take on the Triumph’s 3,100 guests. “If it wasn’t a life-threatening medical emergency, we probably wouldn’t have gotten involved” in transferring passengers in the first place, Zepeda says.

Despite the discomfort of the Triumph’s eight-day saga — by the end of which the ship’s sewage system had backed up and breakfast menus occasionally consisted of cold waffles and candy, according to the New York Times — conditions never got dire enough to prompt an evacuation. Life boats are only deployed in the case of emergency, and both Carnival and the Coast Guard agree that this situation didn’t fit the bill. “We evaluated a wide range of options but the safest and most expedient solution was towing the ship back to port,” says Oliva. And despite its other shortcomings, the Triumph “is still a stable and safe platform,” according to Zepeda. “Unfortunately, despite the discomfort, it’s probably the safest place for them to be, rather than trying to transfer them back and forth via another method.”

Three tugboats have been slowly pulling the cruise ship back to port — a mission that ended up taking five days and was hampered Thursday afternoon just miles offshore by a broken tow line. For the passengers on board the Carnival Triumph, the end of the voyage can’t come soon enough.
 
like I said.... of course... required by laws.

Titanic didn't have enough emergency boats for all passengers so....

Yup, Titanic was back in 1912 - that's 100 years ago. :shock:
 
If I want to have wedding so I will prefer goes to Disney World, not cruise ship.
 
Back
Top