dreamchaser
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
- Messages
- 563
- Reaction score
- 0
No. not "Germans." We arrested mostly Nazi officers who are responsible for their roles in abhorrent Holocaust. Like you said - war = soldiers fight against soldiers. Nazi did not do that.
[/FONT][/COLOR]
I'm sorry but UN does not dictate each country's action. There is no "UN Law" - They are merely an arbitrators for common agreements with the countries such as Geneva Convention.
[/COLOR]
Did you forget? President George Bush, Sr. let him go. We destroyed much of his military capability and put a harsh economic sanction on his country. We thought he's not going to pose a threat again. For god's sake - WILL YOU PLEASE STOP SAYING ARREST? There is no such as "arrest" in war. It is NO ONE'S legal responsibility to arrest other nation's figure unless you are Interpol agent serving an arrest warrant by UN War Tribunal Court - Remember Slobodan Milošević?
[/COLOR]
I have listened to both sides and I have not seen any evidence of illegal war. President Bush acted within his Constitutional Rights which was an Executive Order to defended his country. Do not confuse Kofi Annan with UN. It is Kofi Annan's opinion that it was illegal, not UN. SHOW ME THE ACTUAL LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT HAS CHARGED BUSH OF A WAR CRIME IF THIS WAR WAS IN FACT ILLEGAL. All you showed me is some links to journalists. ThinkProgress? lawl. Washington Post? llawwwwllllll.
From your UN link you gave me - there are bunch of quotes that Saddam failed to heed -
SECURITY COUNCIL HOLDS IRAQ IN ‘MATERIAL BREACH’ OF DISARMAMENT OBLIGATIONS, OFFERS FINAL CHANCE TO COMPLY, UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTING RESOLUTION 1441 (2002)
Iraq War - 2003
"By the unanimous adoption of resolution 1441 (2002), the Council instructed the resumed inspections to begin within 45 days, and also decided it would convene immediately upon the receipt of any reports from inspection authorities that Iraq was interfering with their activities. It recalled, in that context, that the Council had repeatedly warned Iraq that it would face "serious consequences" as a result of continued violations."
"The United Kingdom’s representative said the resolution made crystal clear that Iraq was being given a final opportunity. The Iraqi regime now faced unequivocal choice: between complete disarmament and the serious consequences indicated in the resolution."
many more...
Have you read the books from the weapons inspectors who were IN COUNTRY when Bush pulled them out to start shock and awe? It is pretty compelling evidence that Sadam was comlying with all requests.
for pulled florencegale182´s post. 
Nope. I like making money!
You make soliders look bad... soliders are not mafia. No, military is not business of killing. They risk their life to defend and protect the people and country against enemies... It could be happen when they including innocents people killed.

when I showed you the links and explained why anti-war group are not for war. Now look at your own post... *shake my head* It´s bad when you don´t like my view over war issues... This is my POV... no matter either you like or not. Have you seen me bitter toward you as war-supporter? Nope, but respect you. Where is your respect on my POV but bitter, obsess and
when solider said that he want to go Iraq war... That´s it. I can´t image that you are a true christian as what you claim in other threads... All what I see through you is a hyprocrite. Due to all the respect, I do not wish to debate with you like this... All what I want to debate with agree to disagree in polite way...