*sigh*...... why must you make my job difficult?
*taking out red pen*
what a misguided statement to say.
It's very simple. It's called ASSAULT or BATTERY if any person ever hit a person.
You hit'em, You pay for it. period.
Bullying does not always involved a physical altercation. Bullying can be done verbally or via Internet - taunting, mocking, spreading rumors, etc. A victim can be pushed to the limit where he/she would lashed out and physically injured a bully. No matter what - I believe that victim should be held responsible for it and same for bully who physically injured a victim. I sympathized for victims but violence is not an answer. I do not want any laws that would protect kids from fighting back because it sends message that it's ok to hit people if they're bad people.
I understand that principals/school officials can do nothing about it because on most cases - bully has never physically harmed a victim. Now with growing cases of victims taking extreme measures such as school shootings or committing suicide.... the government finally took action and passed Anti-Bullying laws that would hold bullies and schools accountable even if there was no physical altercation involved.
For that... I am very happy.
Stand-your-ground defense clears Thonotosassa bicyclist in fatal shooting - St. Petersburg Times
In case you didn't know... "Stand Your Ground" law is mainly for firearm-related cases where people use deadly weapons in self-defense on public area. This law does not apply to children at schools. Are you proposing that "Stand Your Ground" law should extend to children at schools using deadly weapons in self-defense against bullies?
I suppose that you believe Columbine School shooters should be protected by "Stand Your Ground" law because they were bullied.
Please think before you spew such ridiculous, outlandish crap. You need to learn to STOP reinventing terms to your misguided agenda. What I'm reading is incredibly sickening.