Trickle down health care costs

Foxrac said:
Both of you need meet at Hooters.

Jillio, you got nice red Obama approved, Lexus car and TXgolfer, you got nice biggest black Dodge RAM truck.

I cannot wait to see your answer to be heard. j/k :lol:
Click to expand...

LOL, I don't go to Hooter's. Besides, it is impossible to have a productive conversation with a man who is more interested in a woman's boobs than he is in engaging in intelligent discussion.:P
 
jillio said:
LOL, I don't go to Hooter's. Besides, it is impossible to have a productive conversation with a man who is more interested in a woman's boobs than he is in engaging in intelligent discussion.:P
Click to expand...

What, boobs? Where?
 
A Hooters franchise need not purchase the healthcare, go figure.
 
saywhatkid said:
Tell me again how this relates to insurance fee mandates in SF...

Think you can find anything to say that is not derogatory towards non-Conservatives, regardless of whether you can substantiate your claims?

I didn't think so.
Click to expand...

You didn't think so because I didn't. And neither did jillio. Beowulf (see post 20) made a comment and then jillio (see post 21) made a comment and then my comment was from Beowulf's post. So unless you are reading between the lines, there was nothing said about SF, althought the original does speak of SF. It was not me who got off topic, but I was just agreeing with Beowulf. So I said nothing derogatory nor do I have any idea who these non-Conservatives are. Don't get your panties in a bunch>
 
StSapphire said:
:P

Just teasing, of course. Just because we disagree about tons of stuff doesn't mean we can't have fun while doing it, right?



Well, to be blunt, you're not the CEO or CFO of these companies. Assuming they're even somewhat competent at their jobs, they'll look at all of these options. Assuming their company and the people making these decisions are competent (a large leap, I realize, but still...), they may come to the conclusion that any of these decisions might negatively affect their profits more than simply reporting the increased costs as... costs, which simply results in them reporting slightly less growth/profits than they otherwise would have.
Click to expand...

Not of these....But I know how I ran mine.


Business economics and the like are extremely complex, and trying to simplify it down occasionally has the detrimental effect of implying that a situation that's somewhat different from the simplified version happens far less than it might actually happen.
Click to expand...

Like I said..


You used the phrase "trickle down" which obviously implies "trickle down economics". After the fact saying "Well, I said 'trickle down' but not 'trickle down economics' so that means you can't use that phrase to criticize me either!" just sounds silly
Click to expand...

To you perhaps.... *shrug*
Click to expand...
 
jillio said:
LOL, I don't go to Hooter's. Besides, it is impossible to have a productive conversation with a man who is more interested in a woman's boobs than he is in engaging in intelligent discussion.:P
Click to expand...

You are the one avoiding questions about what YOU believe.....Kind of an important part of an "intelligent discussion". What exactly are you looking at??? :lol:
 
TXgolfer said:
You are the one avoiding questions about what YOU believe.....Kind of an important part of an "intelligent discussion". What exactly are you looking at??? :lol:
Click to expand...

People who are capable of reading and comprehending my posts don't have a bit of trouble ascertaining what I believe. :dunno2:
 
jillio said:
People who are capable of reading and comprehending my posts don't have a bit of trouble ascertaining what I believe. :dunno2:
Click to expand...

Well sure, but Rumplestiltskin said the same thing. :hmm:
 
jillio said:
People who are capable of reading and comprehending my posts don't have a bit of trouble ascertaining what I believe. :dunno2:
Click to expand...

What planet do they live on? We need them for a translation. :lol:

At least you realize costs incurred by a business will be passed down....you were pretty clear on that.
 
TXgolfer said:
What planet do they live on? We need them for a translation. :lol:

At least you realize costs incurred by a business will be passed down....you were pretty clear on that.
Click to expand...

There are a whole bunch of them on the AD planet.:cool2:
 
This thread is probably 30 seconds away from getting locked. Anyway. I figured if you say things like "obamacare" and "tax" and "trickle down", then I think you mean to talk about "trickle down economics". The situation in SF is not trickle down economics.

Also, the restaurants can't excise a "tax" so much as a "fee"... like delivery fees, housekeeping fees, landlords' endless fees for everything...it's just a way to make the consumer pay for overhead.
 
TheOracle said:
This thread is probably 30 seconds away from getting locked. Anyway. I figured if you say things like "obamacare" and "tax" and "trickle down", then I think you mean to talk about "trickle down economics". The situation in SF is not trickle down economics.

Also, the restaurants can't excise a "tax" so much as a "fee"... like delivery fees, housekeeping fees, landlords' endless fees for everything...it's just a way to make the consumer pay for overhead.
Click to expand...

Pft, nah, politics doesn't get locked around these parts. Just reli--[redacted].
 
TheOracle said:
This thread is probably 30 seconds away from getting locked. Anyway. I figured if you say things like "obamacare" and "tax" and "trickle down", then I think you mean to talk about "trickle down economics". The situation in SF is not trickle down economics.

Also, the restaurants can't excise a "tax" so much as a "fee"... like delivery fees, housekeeping fees, landlords' endless fees for everything...it's just a way to make the consumer pay for overhead.
Click to expand...

hence the term "surcharge"
 
Back
Top