Tom DeLay to be investigated by GOP for wrong doing

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oceanbreeze

New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Messages
9,973
Reaction score
5
Lets see if this actually goes anywhere.

In Reversal, Ethics Panel to Investigate DeLay
House Leader Faces Questions About Conduct
By LARRY MARGASAK, AP

WASHINGTON (April 20) - Retreating under pressure, Republicans on the House ethics committee said Wednesday they were ready to open an investigation into allegations of wrongdoing against Majority Leader Tom DeLay.

Four of the five Republicans on the committee were ready to move ahead, said Rep. Doc Hastings, the panel's Republican chairman. The panel also has five Democratic members.

The Republicans were "prepared to vote at the earliest opportunity to empanel an investigations subcommittee to review various allegations concerning travel and other actions" by DeLay, he said.

The ethics committee has authority to start an investigation based on information it receives "through public and other sources," Hastings said.

Hastings made his announcement in hopes of breaking a deadlock that has prevented the ethics panel from getting down to business for the year.

There was no immediate reaction from Rep. Alan Mollohan of West Virginia, the senior Democrat on the panel.

DeLay has said repeatedly he hopes to appear soon before the panel to clear up questions about his actions.

The Texan has come under intense scrutiny in recent months, in part over questions about overseas trips he took over the past several years.

The ethics committee admonished him last year in connection with other allegations. House Republicans unilaterally pushed through a change in the ethics rules in the following months - changes that Democrats argue were designed to shield the majority leader from further scrutiny.

As a result, Democrats have refused to allow the ethics panel to begin work in the new year.

Hastings had earlier offered to amend the rules that the Republicans had forced through the House. Mollohan rejected that offer, and he and other Democrats have been demanding a bipartisan rewrite.

Hastings' comments at a news conference went well beyond a proposed change in the rules, offering an immediate investigation into one of the most powerful lawmakers in Congress.

"Let me emphasize that this is an unusual and extraordinary step for the committee to take," he said.

He was joined at the news conference by three of the other four Republicans on the panel, Reps. Judy Biggert of Illinois, Melissa Hart of Pennsylvania and Tom Cole of Oklahoma. Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas did not attend.

DeLay and other Republicans have insisted in public comments in recent weeks that the charges against him were partisan in nature, the efforts of a minority desperate to regain power.

At the same time, there has been growing restiveness among members of the GOP rank and file who were unhappy to be on the receiving end of questions about whether they were merely trying to shelter DeLay from harm.

Hastings would not comment on whether he had spoken to DeLay about the proposal - but he did say he could not speak with a member "about matters that may or may not come before the ethics committee."

The investigation cannot proceed unless Democrats end the stalemate over the rules. Hastings called the proposal "a means by which he (DeLay) can state his case."


04/20/05 15:52 EDT

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
 
omg, about time!

Oceanbreeze, may I have your permission for me to plug several articles (links with few quotes) in this topic?
 
Magatsu said:
omg, about time!

Oceanbreeze, may I have your permission for me to plug several articles (links with few quotes) in this topic?

Go ahead. I'm skeptical about this, though. I think they will do their little investigation, conclude that DeLay did nothing wrong, and the matter will be dropped. I hope I am proved wrong.
 
We get the same feeling about this topic. I think they did that to take the heat off from their backs or distraction.
 
It appears that Oceanbreeze is right about this. Here it is:

The tone and phrasing of the article pushes a subtext aimed at hammering home two things:

The Democrats on the comitee are the ones being unreasonable, trying to keep the Ethics comitee from doing its work.

DeLay wants to have an investigation to get this over with and clear his name, but the Democrats are dragging their feet.

The sudden about face has me suspicious already, and the quotes emphasize my concern. Watch for the 'overzelous staffer' who bent the rules further than DeLay knew about and who will be offered up as a sacrificial lamb. And watch for them to trumpet about how tough they were on one of their own in the search for justice, and how nasty the liberal vultures were in the persecution of the now vindicated DeLay.
Who will be on this "investigations subcomitee"? Will they actually ask the right questions? Will they meekly accept avoidance and clearly fallacious answers?

This may be a slight turning of the tide, but it is far from victory. Even were DeLay to be quickly skewered, that is not the best outcome for this country. This needs to be drawn out and laid out for all to see as an example as the kind of morality we can expect from the Neo-con leadership. If it is yesterday's news long before the 2006 elections, that is another kind of defeat.
Source: http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2005/4/20/161740/786/28#28

WASHINGTON, DC - House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer (MD) released the following statement this afternoon regarding the proposal on ethics rules by the new Chairman of the Ethics Committee, Rep. Doc Hastings (R-WA):
"This proposal on the ethics process by the Republican leadership is a charade and an absolute non-starter with Democrats, who reject it out of hand. It is a calculated attempt to divert attention from the fact that the Republican Majority has neutered the Ethics Committee in the House by imposing partisan rules that hamstring any meaningful inquiry, sacking the former Chairman and two other Republican Members of the Committee, and firing non-partisan professional staffers.

Hoyer: Republican Proposal on Ethics Process Is Nothing But a Charade
Ethics Process Must be Based on Bipartisan Compromise, Not Personal Agreements Among Individuals

WASHINGTON, DC - House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer (MD) released the following statement this afternoon regarding the proposal on ethics rules by the new Chairman of the Ethics Committee, Rep. Doc Hastings (R-WA):

"This proposal on the ethics process by the Republican leadership is a charade and an absolute non-starter with Democrats, who reject it out of hand. It is a calculated attempt to divert attention from the fact that the Republican Majority has neutered the Ethics Committee in the House by imposing partisan rules that hamstring any meaningful inquiry, sacking the former Chairman and two other Republican Members of the Committee, and firing non-partisan professional staffers.

"While the American people are surely interested to see that Tom DeLay's fellow Republicans agree that his behavior demands investigation, this offer does not address the fact that Republicans are in a position to block other investigations on a party line vote. This issue is bigger than the Majority Leader, it is about the integrity of the entire House now and in the future.

"In addition, Rep. Hastings's personal assurances on ethics rules and practices - even if put in writing - cannot be the basis for resolving the Republican roadblock on the ethics process. The House ethics process should be based on bipartisan compromise that is supported by both parties, not on personal agreements between individuals that can be made irrelevant by a change of heart or chairmanship.

"The one true thing that this proposal demonstrates is that the Republican leadership is worried that the American people see right through its empty excuse for gutting the ethics process. They are starting to feel the heat for bypassing the Ethics Committee itself and revoking the bipartisan ethics rules that had served this institution and its Members well since 1997.

"The Democratic position on this issue is crystal clear: We should reinstate the bipartisan ethics rules as called for in the Mollohan-Hefley bill, or at the very least the Speaker ought to appoint a bipartisan task force to examine ethics rule changes and report back to the Members."
Source: http://blog.dccc.org/mt/archives/002649.html


Any more of this craps, I smell the charade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top