Tax on rich people

posts from hell said:
There are no family problems. :)
If you guys lived in Omaha you will see how much they have given to the city.

Trying to get links to Fontelle forest.......
Click to expand...

I've visited Omaha and I think it is a nice city and they have did a lot to the city's infrastructure and the developments. The funny thing is that it is in the Midwest but it is not a place to own a home but best place to rent than own because it's cheaper to rent than own.
 
Tousi said:
I didn't think there were negative family dynamics. I preferred to guess that not giving money to the kids was/is a strategic move, geared to get the kids something in a different way, much more to their advantage......

Not sure why Jiro wanted to leave the impression that by not leaving the kids any money, that there was something wrong.......
Click to expand...

And to back you up, check out the book "The Millionaire Next Door"

A statistical study on those who have a net worth of 1 million dollars. The children of the millionaires (those who give money to their children) end up being dependent on them to upkeep their upper class lifestyle but never make as much as their parents.
 
all those died and went to Forest Lawn Must donate 25% of all their accumulated material heirlooms to thrift, secondhand/used shops abroad the country, AND these shop under strigent regulaion must sell these cheap at 95% below the retail market value.
 
i think the rich should be taxed less, heres my reasoning, less tax on rich means theyll spend more on something else and that leads too jobs ^^ tada
 
Back
Top