Strange Analysis! (Freud)

gnarlydorkette

New Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
1,759
Reaction score
0
As I surfed around and garnered my texts on Freud to make a painting for my art class, I thought I will post what I have found sofar based on Freud's theory about "penis envy" among children. Enjoy. :)

(Disclaimer: I have made my own MSword document with a certain style for my artistic expression which won't show up here so I will try my best to inimiate the same expression I want to release toward the topic of "penis envy".)

--------
The phallic stage is the setting for the greatest, most crucial sexual conflict in Freud's model of development. In this stage, the child's erogenous zone is the genital region. As the child becomes more interested in his genitals, and in the genitals of others, conflict arises. The conflict, labeled the Oedipus complex (The Electra complex in women), involves the child's unconscious desire to possess the opposite-sexed parent and to eliminate the same-sexed one.
In the young male, the Oedipus conflict stems from his natural love for his mother, a love which becomes sexual as his libidal energy transfers from the anal region to his genitals. Unfortunately for the boy, his father stands in the way of this love. The boy therefore feels aggression and envy towards this rival, his father, and also feels fear that the father will strike back at him. As the boy has noticed that women, his mother in particular, have no penises, he is struck by a great fear that his father will remove his penis, too. The anxiety is aggravated by the threats and discipline he incurs when caught masturbating by his parents. This castration anxiety outstrips his desire for his mother, so he represses the desire. Moreover, although the boy sees that though he cannot posses his mother, because his father does, he can posses her vicariously by identifying with his father and becoming as much like him as possible: this identification indoctrinates the boy into his appropriate sexual role in life. A lasting trace of the Oedipal conflict is the superego, the voice of the father within the boy. By thus resolving his incestuous conundrum, the boy passes into the latency period, a period of libidal dormancy.
On the Electra complex, Freud was more vague. The complex has its roots in the little girl's discovery that she, along with her mother and all other women, lack the penis which her father and other men posses. Her love for her father then becomes both erotic and envious, as she yearns for a penis of her own. She comes to blame her mother for her perceived castration, and is struck by PENIS ENVY, the apparent counterpart to the boy's castration anxiety. The resolution of the Electra complex is far less clear-cut than the resolution of the Oedipus complex is in males; Freud stated that the resolution comes much later and is never truly complete. Just as the boy learned his sexual role by identifying with his father, so the girl learns her role by identifying with her mother in an attempt to posses her father vicariously. At the eventual resolution of the conflict, the girl passes into the latency period, though Freud implies that she always remains slightly fixated at the phallic stage.
Fixation at the phallic stage develops a phallic character, who is reckless, resolute, self-assured, and narcissistic--excessively vain and proud. The failure to resolve the conflict can also cause a person to be afraid or incapable of close love; As well, Freud postulated that fixation could be a root cause of homosexuality.
----------

Freud is a nutcase, I am telling you.
 
Do people still follow Freud? He is ancient history. :whistle:
 
Reba, people do still follow Freud for their courses, as some of his ideas are still important. I studied Freud last year for my course on Child care and I saw that bit that gnarlydorkette posted above, so weird!!

Must have had a strange childhood poor guy
 
Freud was on crack. That's why.

Wish that all of Freud's books were destroyed now. Theories = fake, no evidence, make-up rubbish stuff.
 
All I knew about Freud is that he's a psychologist.....I never read anything else about him until I read this thread....now, I know why Rose in "Titanic" was talking about Freud and "male size" in the movie. LOL
But I agree....that was one strange article about what Freud believes. I think he has his head in the sand.
 
Back
Top