jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,213
- Reaction score
- 22
As usual, everyone has a problem with each other.
By the way, Merry Christmas.
Very happy holidays to you, as well.

As usual, everyone has a problem with each other.
By the way, Merry Christmas.

In order to make a standard, you would have to be able to prove that ASL and English have better outcomes than English only. I have yet to see a study that shows that using ASL to teach English works better than teaching English. And, again, I know deaf people who would work to have the language be English, that do not think that ASL is the best way to educate deaf children.
But, that is far off base from what I was talking about. I was simply saying that there is not a single deaf perspective that all adhere to, and that by disagreeing, you are not puting down or disrespecting that "deaf experience" (because there is NOT one perspective, there are tons).
Very happy holidays to you, as well.![]()

so since hearing students have one standard.... do you believe we should have same standard for deaf students too?
My problem is with your assertion that one deaf person speaks for ALL deaf people. You pretend that there is one "deaf perspective" and that all who don't make all their decisions based on this one person's view are "disrespecting the experiences of deaf adults". Not a single word of Grendel's response was disrespecting someone's experience, it was responding to clearly false claims.
And as for "disrespecting a deaf adult's experience", that is done CONSTANTLY here by people who call oral deaf people socially backward, say they they never learned language, that they are in denial, that they don't have friends, and on and on. You have picked ONE perspective and declared that it is the only acceptable voice for deaf people.
A hearing person disagreeing with a deaf perspective just strikes me as comical.
To the bolded part - exactly! It would be an ASL-ASL only or one-one school.![]()

In order to make a standard, you would have to be able to prove that ASL and English have better outcomes than English only. I have yet to see a study that shows that using ASL to teach English works better than teaching English. And, again, I know deaf people who would work to have the language be English, that do not think that ASL is the best way to educate deaf children.
But, that is far off base from what I was talking about. I was simply saying that there is not a single deaf perspective that all adhere to, and that by disagreeing, you are not puting down or disrespecting that "deaf experience" (because there is NOT one perspective, there are tons).
Beware, someone might take offense to that!![]()

I have never asserted any such thing. What I have said is that deaf adults speak for the experience of the majority. And that is confirmed here as well as elsewhere.
Deaf people have declared that it is the acceptable perspective, not I. I simply follow their lead. You would do well to do the same.
That has been supported through years of research. Just because you haven't seen it does not mean it isn't there. There was research that stated just that in an earlier thread. Unfortunately, that thread got closed because too many hearing parents took offense at the research.
I'm not. I am disagreeing that Jillio's opinion (and she is hearing) and perspective is the only acceptable perspective for deaf people.
Too many? :roll: There are 3 hearing parents who regularly post here, and all three of them use ASL with their children.
Never once have I stated that my perspective is the correct one for the deaf. The deaf themselves have stated that the perspective they have taught me to adopt is the correct one for the deaf. That is where you are making your gravest error. You assume that because you can't get past your hearing perspective, I can't either. That is a wrong assumption. Maybe after you have been at this awhile, you will see the light. Maybe not. Some people are never able to put themselves in another's shoes.
A hearing person disagreeing with a deaf perspective just strikes me as comical.
Which (of the many) deaf perspectives is in discussion here, though?
Not at all. You don't have the credentials. And I dislike misinformation in this field as much as I dislike misinformation re: deafness. I don't need to convince people of anything. The people who matter already know. And those who have issues they project onto me are not of the least concern to me.
You might want to pay a bit more attention to what the deaf themselves say about what I do. The judgement of the hearing with a few months experience is the least of my concerns.
You are missing that there are plenty of deaf people who disagree with that perspective.
Unlike you, I don't wave my credentials about or challenge others to justify their right to have a perspective. But oh Jillio, you are very wrong. And you don't speak for my daughter.

A hearing person disagreeing with a deaf perspective just strikes me as comical.