Sea creatures flee oil spill, gather near shore

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,433
Reaction score
544
GULF SHORES, Ala. – Dolphins and sharks are showing up in surprisingly shallow water just off the Florida coast. Mullets, crabs, rays and small fish congregate by the thousands off an Alabama pier. Birds covered in oil are crawling deep into marshes, never to be seen again.

Marine scientists studying the effects of the BP disaster are seeing some strange — and troubling — phenomena.

Fish and other wildlife are fleeing the oil out in the Gulf and clustering in cleaner waters along the coast. But that is not the hopeful sign it might appear to be, researchers say.

The animals' presence close to shore means their usual habitat is badly polluted, and the crowding could result in mass die-offs as fish run out of oxygen. Also, the animals could easily get devoured by predators.

"A parallel would be: Why are the wildlife running to the edge of a forest on fire? There will be a lot of fish, sharks, turtles trying to get out of this water they detect is not suitable," said Larry Crowder, a Duke University marine biologist.

The nearly two-month-old oil spill has created an environmental catastrophe unparalleled in U.S. history as tens of millions of gallons of have spewed into the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem. Scientists are seeing some unusual things as they try to understand the effects on thousands of species of marine life.

Day by day, scientists in boats tally up dead birds, sea turtles and other animals, but the toll is surprisingly small given the size of the disaster. The latest figures show that 783 birds, 353 turtles and 41 mammals have died — numbers that pale in comparison to what happened after the Exxon Valdez disaster in Alaska in 1989, when 250,000 birds and 2,800 otters are believed to have died.

Click image to see pictures of Gulf wildlife

Researchers say there are several reasons for the relatively small death toll: The vast nature of the spill means scientists are able to locate only a small fraction of the dead animals. Many will never be found after sinking to the bottom of the sea or getting scavenged by other marine life. And large numbers of birds are meeting their deaths deep in the Louisiana marshes where they seek refuge from the onslaught of oil.

"That is their understanding of how to protect themselves," said Doug Zimmer, spokesman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

For nearly four hours Monday, a three-person crew with Greenpeace cruised past delicate islands and mangrove-dotted inlets in Barataria Bay off southern Louisiana. They saw dolphins by the dozen frolicking in the oily sheen and oil-tinged pelicans feeding their young. But they spotted no dead animals.

"I think part of the reason why we're not seeing more yet is that the impacts of this crisis are really just beginning," Greenpeace marine biologist John Hocevar said.

As for the fish, locals are seeing large schools hanging around piers where fishing has been banned; apparently the fish feel safer now that they are not being disturbed by fishermen.

Also, researchers believe fish are swimming closer to shore because the water is cleaner and more abundant in oxygen. Father out in the Gulf, researchers say, the spill is not only tainting the water with oil but also depleting oxygen levels.

A similar scenario occurs during "dead zone" periods — the time during summer months when oxygen becomes so depleted that fish race toward shore in large numbers. Sometimes, so many fish gather close to the shoreline off Mobile that locals rush to the beach with tubs and nets to reap the harvest.

But this latest shore migration could prove deadly.

First, more oil could eventually wash ashore and overwhelm the fish. They could also become trapped between the slick and the beach, leading to increased competition for oxygen in the water and causing them to die as they run out of air.

"Their ability to avoid it may be limited in the long term, especially if in near-shore refuges they're crowding in close to shore, and oil continues to come in. At some point they'll get trapped," Crowder said. "It could lead to die-offs."

The fish could also fall victim to predators such as sharks and seabirds. Already there have been increased shark sightings in shallow waters along the Gulf Coast.

The counting of dead wildlife in the Gulf is more than an academic exercise; the deaths will help determine how much BP pays in damages.

Roger Helm, chief of the Fish and Wildlife Service's contaminants division, said the government expects a battle with BP over the extent of the damage and has every incentive to be scientifically credible.

"Both sides go to their own corner and interpret the data the way they want," Helm said. "This is a legal process, and if we can't get an agreement we'll end up in court."

Sea creatures flee oil spill, gather near shore - Yahoo! News
 
I only hope that enough action gets taken quick enough to stave off the death of too much wildlife. I suspect I won't get my wish, though. :(
 
Same here! When they start showing pixs on CNN of the birds, I can't look.
 
Feel the same way you do!...It's heart-breaking.

It is truly sad......We are seeing wildlife moved from natural habits.....those that do manage to survive will be potentially dangerous. I am sure news of increased shark attacks is just around the corner.

These are all victims of inaction by obame and BP. If we had accepted the Dutch offer on day 3 much of this wildlife might have been saved. Sure we would have had oil residue......but isn't that better that oil covered wildlife? Just truly disgusting.
 
Have a friend in Florida had a oil covered duck to come onto their place. they called BP and was told BP was too busy then to get it but after it died they were in a real hurry to come pick the dead animal up. Like I told them its WAY cheaper to dispose of a dead animal than it is to rehab it. Its gonna get worse before it gets better.
 
It is truly sad......We are seeing wildlife moved from natural habits.....those that do manage to survive will be potentially dangerous. I am sure news of increased shark attacks is just around the corner.

These are all victims of inaction by obame and BP. If we had accepted the Dutch offer on day 3 much of this wildlife might have been saved. Sure we would have had oil residue......but isn't that better that oil covered wildlife? Just truly disgusting.

if BP didn't cut corner and skimp on safety protocols.... this wouldn't have happened
 
if BP didn't cut corner and skimp on safety protocols.... this wouldn't have happened

And if the Feds would have caught these things on inspection it wouldn't have happened.....Both to blame


Then if BP or the Feds had accepted Dutch help we would be in better shape now too. Oh yeah we had the little EPA regulation on residue.....Desperate times call for desperate measures. That is when leaders lead. That is why Bush waived the Jones Act during Katrina.

Perhaps that's why most in Louisiana believe Bush did a better job with Katrina than obama has done with the spill

Public Policy Polling: Fallout from the Spill
 
It is truly sad......We are seeing wildlife moved from natural habits.....those that do manage to survive will be potentially dangerous. I am sure news of increased shark attacks is just around the corner.

These are all victims of inaction by obame and BP. If we had accepted the Dutch offer on day 3 much of this wildlife might have been saved. Sure we would have had oil residue......but isn't that better that oil covered wildlife? Just truly disgusting.

Dead sharks don't attack.

This whole thing is turning into the cock robin syndrome. Too much finger pointing is going on and we need ACTION, not words. They are shipping brown pelicans to a wildlife refugee near here, but we know what will happen to those birds, don't we?
As for turning down the Dutch offer of help, don't forget BP assured us that the spill was negligible in those first couple days, so why would have have needed an international flotilla?
Anyway, folks, hang onto your hats. This thing is a LOT worse than they are letting on. :eek3:
 
That's sad and I only blame on BP, not federal.
 
That's sad and I only blame on BP, not federal.

Really? So you give the Federal inspectors who inspected and OKed this well a pass? Why? Isn't that what inspections and regulations are for?
 
As for turning down the Dutch offer of help, don't forget BP assured us that the spill was negligible in those first couple days, so why would have have needed an international flotilla?
QUOTE]

That is what leadership does. Like I said earlier. You don't take the word of the people that created the mess. True leadership accepts the help and prepares for worst case scenario. Much cheaper to give the Dutch gas money for the way home, than it is too clean this mess up. True leadership is being prepared. The U.S. "leadership" was not prepared.
 
Back
Top