Return of the banned people! Part II.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Babyblue said:
I agree.

Anyone should be able to be themselves without their professions lingering over head. A person is a person regardless of what profession or where they work.

People are not working 24/7 They need to be able to be themselves.
Click to expand...

My true personality is the total opposite of my "teacher" personality! :lol:
 
shel90 said:
My true personality is the total opposite of my "teacher" personality! :lol:
Click to expand...


I know what you mean. I have seen doctors and lawyers outside of their work.

People perceive others by their professions. but, really takes someone to know a person outside of their workforce.
 
Bottesini said:
I made a thread of a petition to shorten Jillio's ban. Please go sign it. :)
Click to expand...

No, I will not sign it. It wouldn't be fair to others who were banned for a month in the past and none of you/ADers sign a petition for them. So, my question is why only Jillio ? :cool2:
 
Maria said:
No, I will not sign it. It wouldn't be fair to others who were banned for a month in the past and none of you/ADers sign a petition for them. So, my question is why only Jillio ? :cool2:
Click to expand...

I did not know anybody was ever banned for a month.
 
Guys..

I'd like to gently try to remind us to keep this thread from getting "too personal", as that's what got the first one locked up, remember?

If you want to discuss a particular individual's ban, head for the other thread.

Also, the mods are not the law. They are simply officers that enforce the law. The law was enacted by 'us' and the administration. They simply carry out what was already hardcoded for the site.

If you want to appeal it.. head for the other thread.
 
naisho said:
Guys..

I'd like to gently try to remind us to keep this thread from getting "too personal", as that's what got the first one locked up, remember?

If you want to discuss a particular individual's ban, head for the other thread.

Also, the mods are not the law. They are simply officers that enforce the law. The law was enacted by 'us' and the administration.

If you want to appeal it.. head for the other thread.
Click to expand...


thank you, N. i rather keep my thread alive. :D
 
naisho said:
Guys..

I'd like to gently try to remind us to keep this thread from getting "too personal", as that's what got the first one locked up, remember?

If you want to discuss a particular individual's ban, head for the other thread.

Also, the mods are not the law. They are simply officers that enforce the law. The law was enacted by 'us' and the administration. They simply carry out what was already hardcoded for the site.

If you want to appeal it.. head for the other thread.
Click to expand...

You should really stay out of it. With due respect you got favored by allowed two accounts, and plagiarizing an AllDeaf website and nothing happened to you.

You are a big example of blatant favoritism. And you are not a moderator to tell people what to do.
 
shel90 said:
Jillio has stated that when she comes on AD to debate, she leaves the role of counseling to other stuff and just come as herself, as the person. Just like I come here, I am not here as a teacher in some of the threads. I am coming here as me, Shel so when someone told me that because I am a teacher, I should talk or behave in a certain way..I say, "Am I in the classroom?"
Click to expand...

well - jillio did keep using her professional expertise & ethics all the time in most debates.
 
Babyblue said:
I agree.

Anyone should be able to be themselves without their professions lingering over head. A person is a person regardless of what profession or where they work.

People are not working 24/7 They need to be able to be themselves.
Click to expand...

Babyblue said:
I know what you mean. I have seen doctors and lawyers outside of their work.

People perceive others by their professions. but, really takes someone to know a person outside of their workforce.
Click to expand...

that's why AD has rules. she broke it. not once but several times and several warnings. plain and simple.
 
Frisky Feline said:
I thought having the peition do make a difference anyway.


some of members are not like a killer or something so bad. They have their rights to be angry when they make posts so opps. I cant image how someone is not allowed to come back because they disagree with someone else. that is no big deal to me. of course some of us dislike someone who disagree with us but its their rights. Provoking is something that we hate to deal with and they will get over with the provoking.

if someone mentions something so hurtful like i want to kill you.. then the member has to get OUT of this forum for a lifetime. that is different between with provoking and kill you.

its my opinion. we do need people with strong opinions here. :D
Click to expand...

I agree with you on this, but signing on a petition to convince Alex to shorten Jillio's ban time...come on. give me a break. :aw:
 
i start to see why naisho was saying. Just keep my talking & your talking the ban on the other "petition" thread. this thread is just a start head about banning someone and be simple.
 
Oddball said:
I agree with you on this, but signing on a petition to convince Alex to shorten Jillio's ban time...come on. give me a break. :aw:
Click to expand...

yeah i understand. i wasn't there about some years on ad and someone had been banned for a month. so i didnt realize that before. i only see that 30 days is too long for 5th time warning.
 
naisho said:
If I wanted to give an ad hominem back to you, I would say something like, "Well, not all online counselors end up getting banned after their first few notices."...ASLGAL probably, most simply felt like she was getting attacked for her beliefs from my initial observations. Look at the first response from each unique user and see how it ended up going.
Click to expand...

With all due respect, I think Jillio could say the same thing. There were attacks being made on both sides -- not just one.

I still stand by my opinion that counselors are human and it's unfair to expect them to act any differently than another ADer. I'm a social work major who eventually plans to enter psychiatry. Does that mean I don't have a right to express my opinions or disagree when I feel the need to? Perhaps the way Jillio came across was a bit harsh, but again, people are human and can't be expected to act perfectly 100% of the time.

JMO for what it's worth. :)
 
Hear Again said:
With all due respect, I think Jillio could say the same thing. There were attacks being made on both sides -- not just one.

I still stand by my opinion that counselors are human and it's unfair to expect them to act any differently than another ADer. I'm a social work major who eventually plans to enter psychiatry. Does that mean I don't have a right to express my opinions or disagree when I feel the need to? Perhaps the way Jillio came across was a bit harsh, but again, people are human and can't be expected to act perfectly 100% of the time.

JMO for what it's worth. :)
Click to expand...

yes and both of them got spanked. regardless of their professions - they both violated the AD rules. simple as that. If you violated the rule in AD, you'll still get spanked even if you're the President of the United States. :)
 
shel90 said:
Jillio has stated that when she comes on AD to debate, she leaves the role of counseling to other stuff and just come as herself, as the person. Just like I come here, I am not here as a teacher in some of the threads. I am coming here as me, Shel so when someone told me that because I am a teacher, I should talk or behave in a certain way..I say, "Am I in the classroom?"
Click to expand...

Exactly, Shel. Hence the reason why Jillio shouldn't be held to higher standards because of her profession.
 
Just my two cents. I don't understand why things can't get heated up just alittle, it provides insite to others opinions and view points. It's kind of a boring life not being able to voice your opinions..

That probably made no sense but oh well maybe someone will get what I'm saying
 
Jiro said:
yes and both of them got spanked. regardless of their professions - they both violated the AD rules. simple as that. If you violated the rule in AD, you'll still get spanked even if you're the President of the United States. :)
Click to expand...

That's true, but remember you were the one who wanted to hold Jillio accountable for her actions given the nature of her profession. :)
 
chris' mom said:
Just my two cents. I don't understand why things can't get heated up just alittle, it provides insite to others opinions and view points. It's kind of a boring life not being able to voice your opinions..

That probably made no sense but oh well maybe someone will get what I'm saying
Click to expand...

sure why not? it can get heated but the point is - they resorted to enticing, provoking, personal insults, etc. that's a :nono:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top