kokonut
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 16,006
- Reaction score
- 2
Somebody or a group who is certainly angry enough at Cantor (or perhaps the Republican party) to shoot a bullet through his office window. A much more dangerous and violet form of protest than simply spray painting someone else's office or a rock at a window.
FOXNews.com - Cantor Says Campaign Office Was Shot At, Accuses Dems of Exploiting Threats
I wonder who we shall hold responsible for these violent and obviously very dangerous and life threatening actions? Of course, not a rhetorical question here.
Republican Rep. Eric Cantor said Thursday that his Richmond campaign office has been shot at and that he’s received “threatening e-mails” — but at the same time accused top Democrats of trying to exploit the threats they’ve been receiving for “political gain.”
Cantor said “a bullet was shot through the window” of his campaign office. The incident happened Monday, Fox News has learned, the latest in a rash of apparent threats and acts of intimidation against members of Congress. Most of the threats so far have been reported by Democrats, but Cantor — the No. 2 Republican in the House — is one of about 10 lawmakers who has asked for increased security protection, Fox News has learned.
But in brief and pointed remarks, Cantor said he would not be releasing any information about the other threats he’s received, as some lawmakers have done, out of concern that it would “encourage more to be sent.”
And he admonished his colleagues — specifically Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine — for “dangerously fanning the flames by suggesting these incidents be used as a political weapon.”
“Any suggestion that a leader in this body would incite threats or acts against other members, is akin to saying that I would endanger myself, my wife or my children,” Cantor said. “It is reckless to use these incidents as media vehicles for political gain.”
FOXNews.com - Cantor Says Campaign Office Was Shot At, Accuses Dems of Exploiting Threats
I wonder who we shall hold responsible for these violent and obviously very dangerous and life threatening actions? Of course, not a rhetorical question here.
2nd Amendment