asongofhands
Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2011
- Messages
- 65
- Reaction score
- 0
When sign language was banned as a result of the Milan Conference, what sorts of punishment were exacted on people who were caught signing? Sources?
				
			Wasn't the Milan conference in the late 19th century-1880 /90s? Punishment for using signs- 4 lashes with a wet noodle. Plus of course a stern lecture-speak only!
Seems times has changed a bit since!
Fortunately the world has changed somewhat for DEAF persons in this century such as Cochlear Implants-if suitable.
What will the next century bring?
 I hate that hearing people keep trying to get us to hear like normal hearing people.  It is not a miracle, for heaven's sake.  It is still hard to pick the words up.  That is why we need ASL or any sign language if live in different country.  It is much easier to sign than try to lipread.  :roll:
   I hate that hearing people keep trying to get us to hear like normal hearing people.  It is not a miracle, for heaven's sake.  It is still hard to pick the words up.  That is why we need ASL or any sign language if live in different country.  It is much easier to sign than try to lipread.  :roll: Bebonang: I have been  bilateral DEAF since December 20, 2006. I am well aware that not all DEAF persons are "suitable for Cochlear Implants". I have mentioned before the experience of Sunnybrook/Toronto. Since 1984 have processed 3000 referred persons for  consideration of Implants of which 950 were Implanted. Of that group only 18 didn't benefit. From a patients meeting last November.
Bebonang: I have been  bilateral DEAF since December 20, 2006. I am well aware that not all DEAF persons are "suitable for Cochlear Implants". I have mentioned before the experience of Sunnybrook/Toronto. Since 1984 have processed 3000 referred persons for  consideration of Implants of which 950 were Implanted. Of that group only 18 didn't benefit. From a patients meeting last November.