Ohio Court Rules Baby Must Stay on Life Support

Cheri

Prayers for my dad.
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2003
Messages
22,755
Reaction score
9
COLUMBUS, Ohio (Dec. 30) - A brain-damaged baby whose father is accused of abuse cannot be removed from life support because parental rights have not been terminated, the state's highest court said Thursday. The baby's father said he sees signs of recovery.

A court-appointed medical guardian does not have authority to make the life and death decision in the case of Aiden Stein, the Ohio Supreme Court said. The year-old boy was diagnosed with shaken baby syndrome and remains hospitalized and dependent upon a ventilator and feeding tube.

"A probate court has no authority to allow a guardian to make a decision that will terminate the life of a child, when parental rights have not been permanently terminated," Justice Evelyn Lundberg Stratton wrote.

Matthew Stein, 21, is suspected of injuring his son March 15 and could be charged with murder if the baby dies, police said. No charges have been filed; Stein denies harming the boy.

Officials have said the guardian, Ellen Kaforey, was assigned because Stein and the baby's mother, Arica Heimlich, 22, have a conflict of interest in determining whether Aiden is kept alive.

Kaforey was in court Thursday and not available for comment. Her attorney, Linda Kersker, said she could not discuss whether there will be an appeal.

A doctor has testified Aiden is blind, deaf and unaware of his surroundings. The baby's parents have said they believe their son would recover if given more time.

Aiden opens his eyes and looks at familiar people who speak to him and makes faces when his toenails are clipped, the father said.

"He shows responses to stimulation," he said, adding the high court's decision was a relief.

"It takes a big load off your shoulders as far as going to bed every night wondering what their decision is going to be," Stein said.

The ruling overturns an appeals court decision that the parents gave up their right to challenge the probate court ruling when they participated in the four-day guardianship hearing in April.

Summit County Probate Judge Bill Spicer had allowed the guardian to have the baby's life support turned off, but the state Supreme Court halted the order and agreed to hear the case.

Matthew Stein had testified in the guardianship hearing that the baby's injuries could have come from being struck by a ceiling fan blade when an aunt lifted him above her head, and from accidentally striking his head on his bassinet railing.

Three doctors said there was an earlier small injury, but that the massive brain injury could be caused only by rapid back-and-forth movement the morning Aiden began having trouble breathing.
By CARRIE SPENCER, AP (Cannot post the Link because it on AOL News)


I saw the picture of the baby and he is soo cute. :( I think the father did shaken the baby but no proof however. But, just a guts feeling. :pissed:
 
Hmm... it says that he will be found guilty if the baby dies. I guess that's why he's trying to keep it alive... for himself? :roll:
 
VamPyroX said:
Hmm... it says that he will be found guilty if the baby dies. I guess that's why he's trying to keep it alive... for himself? :roll:

No...Well, maybe...But, there is a disagreement on WHO has the authority to make the decision since a court appointed gaurdian has been ordered for the child. If I understand correctly, it's an issue of custody. Apparently, this child is in the STATE'S care, and has a court appointed gaurdian. I also believe, if I understand correctly, that the state is trying to terminate parental rights to the parents. IS IT BECAUSE OF THIS that the court ruled the way it did. From the way I undestand it, Ohio law dictates that as long as the parent's rights have NOT been terminated, then, the court appointed gaurdian does NOT have the legal right to terminate life support.

Having said that, Vamp, I agree with your statement. It would appear that that the father would try to keep the baby alive to save his own butt. I've heard about things like this before, and I think it's tragic.

But, for now, lets just HOPE that whatever happens, that the right thing is done by the baby. Ohio can deal with the father later, especially, if he is eventually charged with murder. There is no statute of limitations on murder.
 
This reminds me of what happened in Florida. There was this woman who was a vegetable. She was on life support and would never come out of it. Her husband decided to take her off of life support. However, her parents wanted the state to overturn her husband's decision so they took the case to court. The state won and the governor ordered her to be put back on support. She's now back to suffering. :roll:
 
VamPyroX said:
This reminds me of what happened in Florida. There was this woman who was a vegetable. She was on life support and would never come out of it. Her husband decided to take her off of life support. However, her parents wanted the state to overturn her husband's decision so they took the case to court. The state won and the governor ordered her to be put back on support. She's now back to suffering. :roll:


Yep! I know the case you speak of...And, actually there is more to report about this. The parents tried to take an appeal to the FL Supreme Ct. They wanted the courts to rule that terminating her tube feedings was against her freedom of religious expression. Basically, they were trying to say that, since she was a practicing Roman Catholic, removing her tube was going against her faith.

The court rejected that. Didn't even want to hear the appeal. So, now...They have two weeks, and it's POSSIBLE that her tube can finally be removed once the stay is lifted in 15 days. That's if, however, they don't get relief from the US Supreme Court on "Terri's Law". This is unlikely since we are dealing with a STATE issue and it has NO bearing on Federal law.
 
Back
Top