Not Cool !!!! Look what the terrorists are up to with dogs.

Heath

Active Member
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
8,069
Reaction score
1
Description

Apparently insurgents in Iraq plant bombs under dead dogs so the army is forced to blow up all roadkill they see as a precaution.

See Video Clip:

Clean, no blood or gore. This made me upset.

http://www.break.com/movies/dogbomb.html
 
Oh jeez they copy that from horses that they did back in olden days....like one example remember the sparta story? trojans inside the horses? Really sick.
 
Heath,

I find it beyond disturbing that dogs, or any animals, are used in such a way.

In fact, I have begun to watch what products I buy because of animal testing done for them. Some of the products I still have, but when they're all used up, I will never buy them or anything from those companies again. :nono:
 
Which would you rather do...

Risk the lives of soldiers?

OR

Risk the live of one dog?
 
VamPyroX said:
Which would you rather do...

Risk the lives of soldiers?

OR

Risk the live of one dog?


Who join soldiers voluntarily? OF solider, not dog! They has no right to use dog for test because it´s them who join soldiers voluntarily then they should do THEMSELVES, not use innoncent animals for test.
 
Has the world gone crazy or am I seeing something real? *rubbing my eyes*
 
sequoias said:
Has the world gone crazy or am I seeing something real? *rubbing my eyes*

Something real, yes..... :shakes my head:
 
VamPyroX said:
Which would you rather do...

Risk the lives of soldiers?

OR

Risk the live of one dog?


I'm confused (which isn't hard sometimes). I was under the impression that the animal was already dead (killed by insurgents) and then the bomb placed under it as a hiding spot for roadside bombs. I don't think it wass a matter of live soldier vs live dog and who should live.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
Who join soldiers voluntarily? OF solider, not dog! They has no right to use dog for test because it´s them who join soldiers voluntarily then they should do THEMSELVES, not use innoncent animals for test.
Test? What test? They're not doing experiments on dogs. The dogs are already dead and converted to booby traps.

That would be like someone converting a dead rat to a bomb in your driveway. You don't know about it and walk up to pick it up and throw it away... BOOM!
 
Taylor said:
I'm confused (which isn't hard sometimes). I was under the impression that the animal was already dead (killed by insurgents) and then the bomb placed under it as a hiding spot for roadside bombs. I don't think it wass a matter of live soldier vs live dog and who should live.
That's what I mean.

Risking the lives of living soldiers or the lives of one dog that's already dead.
 
For those who truly find abuse of animals upsetting I suggest
you only enter the following website forewarned that it's content is
extremely disturbing, I myself curious about animal experimentation
and the treatment/ living conditions of the animals we consume that are marketed found myself very emotionally messed up for the evening and
following week after watching PETA TV.

PETA-(People for the Ethnical Treatment of Animals) at
www.petatv.com

It's sick minded and horrifying that it's legal for animals to
be treated as such and is even more disturbing to find out
that most the beef and poultry we consume is diseased.
 
I hate to break this to you.But Terrorist use animals like dogs and cats for chemical gas experments.I know its only a movie but you should watch sleeper cell on Showtime.A terrorist name Farik ask guys in his group to buy animals from a fair as pets.It says give these animals to a good home.Well the terrorist bought the cutest dogs they found.Then Farik took those animals out to a dessert and guys got barrels with chemical mustard gas and blew it up and dogs started barking and then whimpering and gasp for air and it kinda upseted me.And Farik said "" Perfect!! We know now what it does on four legged creatures.Now we begin on two legged creatures next"" While i was watching the credits on Showtime. im thankful it was monitored by the ASPCA and no animal was harmed of making this movie.That means the animals were just good actors playing like they were dying from a chemical explosive. Heres the link if you wanna know what im talking about.

Warning Scene might be upsetting
 
Buckdodgers said:
I hate to break this to you.But Terrorist use animals like dogs and cats for chemical gas experments.I know its only a movie but you should watch sleeper cell on Showtime.A terrorist name Farik ask guys in his group to buy animals from a fair as pets.It says give these animals to a good home.Well the terrorist bought the cutest dogs they found.Then Farik took those animals out to a dessert and guys got barrels with chemical mustard gas and blew it up and dogs started barking and then whimpering and gasp for air and it kinda upseted me.And Farik said "" Perfect!! We know now what it does on four legged creatures.Now we begin on two legged creatures next"" While i was watching the credits on Showtime. im thankful it was monitored by the ASPCA and no animal was harmed of making this movie.That means the animals were just good actors playing like they were dying from a chemical explosive. Heres the link if you wanna know what im talking about.

Warning Scene might be upsetting

Some of them terrorists are United States companies, too. For examples: Proctor & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Mary Kate and Ashley -- whatever those bitch faces last name is, from that tv show. Let's not forget companies whose products are Dial soap, Palmolive dish soap, Jovan (fragrance) and many others.
 
Ah, I seen about these threads. Nothing we can do anything since they were already dead before here unless stop bad people.

We buys the stuffs that already testing on animals before us unless boycott not buy anything that tested on animals.

What more, animals don't having their rights or lawyers to stop the human being's actions unless make timetravel machine to travel all way back then kill all human beings.

Otherwise God gave us animals for many reasons between good and bad and worse.

All I do is hugging my pets here and protects them from harm people.
 
Pets are good for entertainment.My cat used to make me laugh when i shine a flashlight on the floor and she tries to catch it.
 
I have seen the horrors of animal cruelty since I was 17 and am still
affected the same every time I see the extent of cruelty that is legalized,
as for those animals marketed or hunted I am not against the humane
killing of an animal for food but when you torcher or make its life miserable
prior death that I do have a problem with because its cruel and is not how
we ourselves would want to be treated.
 
I found the website that showed the video of terrorist cut the dog's stomach open and stuffes IED inside. Then they put it on the side of the road and waited until blew US's humvee up.

Not pretty video as I thought aboutdo paste the video here but...no good idea. I just know the kind of that or video violence like shot guy's head off, blew the people up that don't fit here since I looked up all the threads and nothing to be find.

So, I respect AllDeaf website here.
 
MaxUFC said:
I found the website that showed the video of terrorist cut the dog's stomach open and stuffes IED inside. Then they put it on the side of the road and waited until blew US's humvee up.

Not pretty video as I thought aboutdo paste the video here but...no good idea. I just know the kind of that or video violence like shot guy's head off, blew the people up that don't fit here since I looked up all the threads and nothing to be find.

So, I respect AllDeaf website here.

I have posted a few video clips but they always came with a good reason or there was captions/subtitles with the video clip if possible and I put up in red

Caution: Warning .... Not suitable for children

with some of these war video clips or another things that I have posted with a brief description...... I am sure if you want to post a video clip , you can please do so but with a good reason explaining why you are posting the video clip with a red caution warning with a brief description then it is up to the AllDeaf reader if they want to click on the video clip to see what you are talking about. I think if you post that video clip. It would speak for itself with a red warning followed by a brief description, depending on how graphic the video clip is. Use your good judgement and commonsense. Some video clips do really need to be seen in the right way for educational or information purposes only.
 
Back
Top