Noah's Ark Discovered in Iran?

Heath said:
Perphaps Teresh, you would like to explain that to the Israel Antiquities Authority ?

Jesus Christ's boat has been found.

The Pool of Siloam has been found.

The Ark of the Convenant location has been found.

Noah's Ark has been found.

So many things have been found.

I am beginning to learn much more from the Israeli museum.

http://www.antiquities.org.il/home_eng.asp
How do they know it was Jesus' boat?

Remember, the Bible could be made up... but with actual locations that are real.

We see movies that take place in New York City. Yes, what you see in the movie on the location is REAL... but the events that happen are made up.
 
Please rememeber, I found NOTHING that mentioned Noah's Ark, Jesus' Boat, etc. on that website. Either Heath's lying to make you think it's true or I just don't find it.
 
netrox said:
Please rememeber, I found NOTHING that mentioned Noah's Ark, Jesus' Boat, etc. on that website. Either Heath's lying to make you think it's true or I just don't find it.

No, I am not lying and I have not had time to really look through the Israeli museum website.

Here are a couple more.

http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?page=article&id=1817

http://www.bib-arch.org/

http://www.biblicalarcheology.net/

http://www.biblehistory.net/

http://www.baseinstitute.org/

http://www.biblemysteries.com/
 
I like the sentence in the first link that "Archaeology has confirmed without question the historical accuracy of the Bible."

I recalled that archeology actually proved that Nazareth - never existed as a town at the time that Jesus supposily lived. There was a buriel place in that area, but no town...

I should read the articles more closely.... but I can't be bothered.
-----------------------
Looked up where I got that idea from...
(From this website)
However when we look for historical confirmation of this hometown of a god – surprise, surprise! – no other source confirms that the place even existed in the 1st century AD.

• Nazareth is not mentioned even once in the entire Old Testament. The Book of Joshua (19.10,16) – in what it claims is the process of settlement by the tribe of Zebulon in the area – records twelve towns and six villages and yet omits any 'Nazareth' from its list.

• The Talmud, although it names 63 Galilean towns, knows nothing of Nazareth, nor does early rabbinic literature.

• St Paul knows nothing of 'Nazareth'. Rabbi Solly's epistles (real and fake) mention Jesus 221 times, Nazareth not at all.

• No ancient historian or geographer mentions Nazareth. It is first noted at the beginning of the 4th century.
........................
1996 -1997 Dr. Pfann (Franciscan School of Theology) digs at Nazareth. In November 1996 Stephen Pfann of the Center for the Study of Early Christianity began an investigation of agricultural terraces in the grounds of Nazareth Hospital. What Pfann and his crew came up with was a vaguely-dated winepress, described as 'ancient'. Potsherds were also found on the surface of the terraces, dating from various periods 'beginning with the early to late Roman periods.'

An archaeological survey of the surface of the land adjacent to Nazareth Hospital was conducted between February and May 1997 by Pfann and a team, all from the Center for the Study of Early Christianity. Two distinct areas were identified which are defined by the type of terracing found there.

With typical Christian zeal Pfann was able to conclude that 'Nazareth was tiny, with two or three clans living in 35 homes spread over 2.5 hectares'. It was just unfortunate that all evidence of the homes was razed by later invaders.

In truth, the scanty evidence is consistent with the site being used as a single family farm over many centuries – and a single family farm does not make a village.
..................
Today more than a million visitors (fifty per cent of tourists visiting Israel) call at Nazareth. Who would want to spoil the party? So perhaps keep it quiet ...
The evidence for a 1st century town of Nazareth does not exist – not literary, not archaeological, and not historical. It is an imaginary city for an imaginary god-man.
 
Last edited:
I am beginning to learn much more from the Israeli museum.
Yes, but Heath.....(sarcasm) That's information from JEWISH people!!!! (/end sarcasm) I thought you said that there was this giant Jewish conspriacy and that Jewish people have too much power!
 
And what's Jesus' boat anyway? I don't remmy reading about Jesus' boat in the Bible.
 
deafdyke said:
And what's Jesus' boat anyway? I don't remmy reading about Jesus' boat in the Bible.

Jesus Christ walked on the water to show faith and fed people 5,000 loaves and fish to show that God is the Divine Provider.
 
deafdyke said:
Yes, but Heath.....(sarcasm) That's information from JEWISH people!!!! (/end sarcasm) I thought you said that there was this giant Jewish conspriacy and that Jewish people have too much power!

Yes they do have way too much power and are corrupting the very soul of America that made this country great and the jews need to focus more on their own country in the Middle East called Israel.
 
Cloggy said:
I like the sentence in the first link that "Archaeology has confirmed without question the historical accuracy of the Bible."

I recalled that archeology actually proved that Nazareth - never existed as a town at the time that Jesus supposily lived. There was a buriel place in that area, but no town...

I should read the articles more closely.... but I can't be bothered.
-----------------------
Looked up where I got that idea from...
(From this website)
Nazareth doesn't exist? Wow... that's a pretty big lie and assumption that we've got going on these days!
 
So if there's this huge power conspiracy, then how come you're trusting infromation from JEWISH sources?
So, Jesus used a boat to walk on water?
 
No, I am not lying and I have not had time to really look through the Israeli museum website.

You're lying. It's obvious. Plus the links you gave are based on religious bias with no regard for facts. It's not scientific.

Paul claims Nazareth was a city but there's no city named Nazareth in any historical text except the NT itself. There is NO historian reporting that city. Nada. It simply did not exist. A city cannot just disappear that fast.

Nazareth doesn't exist? Wow... that's a pretty big lie and assumption that we've got going on these days!

No, I think you got it backwards... don't you think that the fact Nazareth was not mentioned nor found may reveal that the NT was the big lie?
 
Hey Heath....how come you keep ignoring my posts? Is it b/c you can't figure out how to respond to them?
 
deafdyke said:
So if there's this huge power conspiracy, then how come you're trusting infromation from JEWISH sources?
So, Jesus used a boat to walk on water?
I think I remember reading an article about a scientist who theorized that there was floating ice in the area at that time when Jesus supposedly walked on water. So, Jesus was probably doing it and others didn't understand the concept of floating ice. So, they believed it. :dunno:
 
hmmmmm.....on the other hand....I think if you believe a lot of the Buddist mysticism stuff.....like if you have enough faith you can do something, you could also believe that Jesus walked on water.
 
Heath said:
Perphaps Teresh, you would like to explain that to the Israel Antiquities Authority ?

Heath said:
Jesus Christ's boat has been found.

How does one identify Jesus's boat?

Heath said:
The Ark of the Convenant location has been found.

No, it hasn't. In many respects, the Ark of the Covenant is the Holy Grail of Judaism--A mythic object of great value that seems to have been lost to the sands of time. It is currently believed to reside under the Temple Mount, but the Israeli government blocks most of the excavation of the site that would be possible due to the Dome of the Rock being present there.

Heath said:
Noah's Ark has been found.

Again, how do we identify it? Does it have his name on it?
 
Yeah that's true. I believe that's where it is. I remember that story myself.


That would be in far east Turkey near Russia border (actually not Russia but a country that used to be part of Russia/Soviet though)
 
Back
Top