Net file-sharing doesn't hurt most musicians

Vance

New Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
4,265
Reaction score
1
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Most musicians and artists say the Internet has helped them make more money from their work despite online file-trading services that allow users to copy songs and other material for free, according to a study released Sunday.

Recording labels and movie studios have hired phalanxes of lawyers to pursue "peer to peer" networks like Kazaa, and have sued thousands of individuals who distribute copyrighted material through such networks.

But most of the artists surveyed by the nonprofit Pew Internet and American Life Project said online file sharing did not concern them much.

Artists were split on the merits of peer-to-peer networks, with 47 percent saying that they prevent artists from earning royalties for their work and another 43 percent saying they helped promote and distribute their material.

But two-thirds of those surveyed said file sharing posed little threat to them, and less than one-third of those surveyed said file sharing was a major threat to creative industries.

Only 3 percent said the Internet hurt their ability to protect their creative works.

"What we hear from a wide spectrum of artists is that, despite the real challenges of protecting work online, the Internet has opened new ways for them to exercise their imaginations and sell their creations," said report author Mary Madden, a research specialist at the Pew Internet and American Life Project.

The nonprofit group based its report on a survey of 809 self-identified artists in December 2003. The survey has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.

Source: http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/12/06/tech.music.reut/index.html
 
Something to keep in mind is that the RIAA and other groups going after filesharing are protecting their copyright. If you create your own song, you can distribute it any way you wish. A lot of artists legally promote the sharing of their music. Its when somebody else is handling their music, such as the RIAA or a record company that a problem is created.

I can't say that I agree with the sharing of music (or other copyrighted material). This is why copyrights exists. I handle the design of several websites, and I've had other people copy my websites or copy my images. My work is copyrighted so why should another webmaster feel free to copy it and use it on their sites? Same with music....musicians need to eat also and their work being given away for free doesn't put food on the table. If they want to give it away for free, that is fine, but I don't believe it is right to get pissed off at a band because they won't give away their stuff for free.

I've actually heard people say that bands don't have a right to protect their material. A lot of money is spent in the creation of music, and why should a musician not get paid for their time, expenses and their talent?
 
Back
Top