Don't have a leg to stand on
So there is no need to call someone a name? Well you insinuated racism and you did not answer my question, how many letters to Congress or actions have you participated in to change the current situation? I am going to assume none, since you did not mention any. Re read the posts, nowhere did I ever say that ALL muslims were bad, remember that it was me that mentioned the invention of chivalry was originally done by King Saladin. (Guess, you chose to conveniently skip that part) .
The mention of Germany was to prove that when we were at war with Germany, no one asked, which Germans agreed or disagreed with the Nazi's. Do you know how many innocent people were killed in the bombing of Dresden? Do you even care? Do you know how many people that may or may not have opposed the Japanese regime were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Do you even care about that either? It was a war, the United States ( oh by the way the rest of the world for that matter) could not let Adolf Hitler take the world for the sake of the fact that there were people living under those regimes that did not agree. Any more than we, in the present day world can say that for the sake of innocence, are going to let the terrorist run rampant. Guessed that you missed the whole point of that argument as well.
Oh, so because the dictatorships of Hussein were so monstrous I am supposed to allow the people underneath them not be held to the same standard? Re read my last post, I was opposed to unlawfully holding people in Guatanomo Bay and was opposed to the Abu Gharib acts, because while war is one thing barbaric treatment is another.I was holding our country in higher standard for the way the we treat our prisoners of war because we ARE supposed to be so.
Still don't think I have a leg to stand on in my argument? I could not care less, and yes I do feel that liberals are cowards and hypocrites,by the way. Could you please come up with a better line than you want your cake and eat it too? You have used that no less than five times in the last posts and surely you can come up with something a little bit more original. I got to admit, I like it a little bit better than peace out, but PLEASE! I already told you. I have been inside the mosques, I have talked to many muslims and had heated arguments about these very issues. That is something that an extremist does not do.I came to this conclusion after years of studying it. But, you, sensitive about name calling, want to accuse me of ignorance. Well, I can take some name calling, I am a grown man and not too afraid of it. Blinded by hate? That was another accusation of yours, right ? You seemed to want to focus on the innocent blood on one side, no consideration for the other. You stated that the United States had a hand in this war, was that the fault of all the innocents that died in 9/11? Maybe your the one blinded by hate?
The fact of the matter is that the current Muslim Leadership is not speaking out against the current goings on and no amount of bullshit talk is going to change it. If Saladin, were still alive I am sure that the situation would not be the same but those are the facts, right or wrong, the truth is beyond morality and right and wrong. Read Azar Nafisi's Reading Lolita in Tehran, I don't care how many peaceful Muslims that there are, the leaders are not peaceful. That it the point that I have been trying to make all along (if that is wanting my cake and eating it too, well tough shit, personally I don't like cake). Why don't you look at what I was really trying to mention instead of reading into it what you want to make of it? Maybe it is you that wants your cake and eat it too!