Leftist Hackers Hack Joe Wilson's Donation Page

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lies, lies, and more lies. All have been debunked. :roll: And resorting to name calling. Like I said, grasping at straws when fact cannot support.

Out of the list I provided I can certainly say that out of one or all of those in the list the majority of Americans do not like what they are seeing. I'm sure the majority Americans are embracing with pride that Obama quintupled the running deficit (over Bush's 2008 deficit) that was in done in an amazing 6 months. A record!! Whoo hoooo!! Yeah, that's the ticket. Oooh, all the love for a $2 trillion dollar running deficit when they were screaming in apoplectic fits over Bush' own deficit of some $400+ billion he helped create in 12 months in 2008. Never mind Obama's $2 trillion excess (money we don't have) in an amazing 6 months. What do we hear?

*chirp*
*chrip*
*chirp*

Their new maxim? "Spend, spend, spend!! And max out all of your credit cards to help pay off your debt."

Either you support fiscal responsibility or you don't. You gotta make up your mind but I get the feeling many people already did by keeping quiet about this. Speaks volume, dear.
 
Out of the list I provided I can certainly say that out of one or all of those in the list the majority of Americans do not like what they are seeing. I'm sure the majority Americans are embracing with pride that Obama quintupled the running deficit (over Bush's 2008 deficit) that was in done in an amazing 6 months. A record!! Whoo hoooo!! Yeah, that's the ticket. Oooh, all the love for a $2 trillion dollar running deficit when they were screaming in apoplectic fits over Bush' own deficit of some $400+ billion he helped create in 12 months in 2008. Never mind Obama's $2 trillion excess (money we don't have) in an amazing 6 months. What do we hear?

*chirp*
*chrip*
*chirp*

Their new maxim? "Spend, spend, spend!! And max out all of your credit cards to help pay off your debt."

Either you support fiscal responsibility or you don't. You gotta make up your mind but I get the feeling many people already did by keeping quiet about this. Speaks volume, dear.

Digging into the bottom of the barrel.:roll:
 
Not a spin. It's the truth. This is a tactic by people who wish to somehow avoid acknowledging what's already obvious to everybody else who do not like what they're seeing in the WH and what's happening in America going down the toilet by avoiding the question with non-answers and re-directs. Not exactly a forte but an Achille-Heel.
 
Not a spin. It's the truth. This is a tactic by people who wish to somehow avoid acknowledging what's already obvious to everybody else who do not like what they're seeing in the WH and what's happening in America going down the toilet by avoiding the question with non-answers and re-directs. Not exactly a forte but an Achille-Heel.

Who is "everyone else?"

You? Deaffreedom? Your blog followers?

Who? There's 300 million people in the United States.
 
Who is "everyone else?"

You? Deaffreedom? Your blog followers?

Who? There's 300 million people in the United States.

You don't understand. Let me clarify. Out of all those that I listed, you can certainly bet that the majority will not like one or more of those that I listed. Or are you telling me that having a running deficit over the last 6 months that is quintuple the size of Bush' own deficit he helped create in his last 12 months a good thing????
 
Last edited:
Notice the lack of a good response to the Watergate pictures? Also notice how every topic becomes the same tired "We are going to hell in a handbasket over spending" no matter the OP? I thought we were discussing "Those Leftist Hackers" not Obama. Funny how that works.
 
Notice the lack of a good response to the Watergate pictures? Also notice how every topic becomes the same tired "We are going to hell in a handbasket over spending" no matter the OP? I thought we were discussing "Those Leftist Hackers" not Obama. Funny how that works.

Sorry. As I have said before, it's not the same thing. Unless, of course, you can somehow prove that it was the first internet hacking example.
 
How do you know they were "leftist", whatever the hell that word means?
 
You don't understand. Let me clarify. Out of all those that I listed, you can certainly bet that the majority will not like one or more of those that I listed. Or are you telling me that having a running deficit over the last 6 months that is quintuple the size of Bush' own deficit he helped create in his last 12 months a good thing????

What does it have to do with Joe Wilson's donation page being hacked? You digress into your personal agenda again. Focus, kokonut, focus. Not every thread requires the same response from you. You need to tailor your pre-written responses garnered from other websites to fit the topics here.:cool2:
 
Pretty simple...in such a short time frame after the "You Lie!" two his donation sites get hacked. Politically motived is what it looks like.

Focus on the argument, not about the person making the argument in the attempt to create strawman responses.
 
Pretty simple...in such a short time frame after the "You Lie!" two his donation sites get hacked. Politically motived is what it looks like.

Focus on the argument, not about the person making the argument in the attempt to create strawman responses.

You see a lot of things lurking around corners that aren't there. :cool2: Doesn't make it real.

And the focus was on the post. Your decidedly off topic, rambling, and disjointed attempt to divert the thread through the wording in the post.
 
Pretty simple...in such a short time frame after the "You Lie!" two his donation sites get hacked. Politically motived is what it looks like.

Focus on the argument, not about the person making the argument in the attempt to create strawman responses.

Go spend some time in the Internet community like SomethingAwful or another popular online community before claiming it is a political agenda.

Maybe you will realize that hackers that launch cyberattacks are just full of malice.
 
Go spend some time in the Internet community like SomethingAwful or another popular online community before claiming it is a political agenda.

Maybe you will realize that hackers that launch cyberattacks are just full of malice.

Exactly. The nature of their target is rarely an issue. It is simply all about having a target, and one upping them.
 
Go spend some time in the Internet community like SomethingAwful or another popular online community before claiming it is a political agenda.

Maybe you will realize that hackers that launch cyberattacks are just full of malice.
Yes, full of malice, true. You also have to look at the agenda behind the attack. And there are many agendas. The Pentagon gets hacked regularly and they know many of it come from China.

I believe it's politically motivated. Prove me wrong. I'm stating my opinion.
 
Yes, full of malice, true. You also have to look at the agenda behind the attack. And there are many agendas. The Pentagon gets hacked regularly and they know many of it come from China.

I believe it's politically motivated. Prove me wrong. I'm stating my opinion.

You made the claim. Support your claim with evidence.:roll: Try something new for a change.
 
China is a cyber dead-zone. It's a refugee for people to hide from the laws.

If someone hacked your blog from Sweden, would you accuse the Swedes of being politically motivated? Maybe you would, but I wouldn't. Why? Sweden is a refugee for illegal Internet activities due to their privacy laws protecting the servers from lawsuits.

So an American route their ISP from the United States to a Swedish server, then hack from there. Then the trail runs cold because the Swedish government are not required to hand over their clients to someone else.
 
China is a cyber dead-zone. It's a refugee for people to hide from the laws.

If someone hacked your blog from Sweden, would you accuse the Swedes of being politically motivated? Maybe you would, but I wouldn't. Why? Sweden is a refugee for illegal Internet activities due to their privacy laws protecting the servers from lawsuits.

So an American route their ISP from the United States to a Swedish server, then hack from there. Then the trail runs cold because the Swedish government are not required to hand over their clients to someone else.

The site was specific.
The timing was the motivation.
The background is political.
That's how I see it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top