"It's Just a God-Damned Piece of Paper!"

So?
As Doug Thompson explains in the article, he does not bum his sources.
All we have to go on is the indescribable feeling that we are hearing the truth, it has the ring of truth to it. It is no secret that Bush flies off the handle very easily nowadays, and it is perfectly understandable that the sources wish to remain anonymous. (Have you seen the way Bush moves his jaws so weirdly? I SWEAR is is high on cocaine---I used to work in a Detox unit, so I know what I am seeing, and that makes Bush all the more dangerous.)
There is a story about Kruschev holding a townhall meeting, and the subject of Stalin came up. Someone in the back of the room piped that Kruschev was close to Stalin, and why he didn't stop him from committing all the atrocities.
"Who said that?" Kruschev demanded.
There was a silence.
"WHO SAID THAT?" Kruschev roared.
The terrified silence continued.
Kruschev then growled, "Now you know why."
 
Beowulf said:
...The journalist who first reported it, Doug Thompson, has won numerous awards for his writing....
Click to expand...
Dan Rather won numerous awards for his reporting too, and look what happened to his credibility. :D
 
Right, it only takes once to get it wrong--Dan Rather thought he heard the "ring of truth" when in fact it was only the ringing sound of his own biases.
 
One of the first things we learned in journalism school was never quote unattributed (unnamed) sources.
 
And have you won any awards, Reba?
;)
Ah, the wisdom of hindsight. Dan Rather got fired because a letter from Bush's commanding officer could not be authenticated (in which it said Bush did not show up for a physical, i.e., was AWOL), but as it turned out, he was absolutely correct. It is already common knowledge that Bush was, and still is, a deserter.
So what else is new?
:)
 
Caution:

That is not very smart to say that about the U.S. President. What if the extremely serious Secret Service ( S.S. ) guys noticed that post then all of a sudden at 5:00 A.M. The U.S. Government bangs your door down with swarming SWAT guns and vicious dogs trained on you then they violently put you under arrest then you are in a van with no windows slammed shut then the S.S. agents punches your lights out then you wake up and struggle in cuffs and shout for help and tries to use American Sign Language ( ASL ) with cuffs on. You are under a single rolling dimmed light bulb and suddenly the S.S. agent roars into you and the shock of forgetting you had your hearing aids on frightens you even more because you never heard the sound of a man roaring like an angry and vicious animal....

" Why did you threaten to shoot the President of the United States of America ???!!!!???!!! "

He won't take No for an answer and you can not tell him you were joking or say sheesh ummm or even laugh at all.

This is an interrogration room where you could live or be dead.

That in itself is very frightening.

My advice : Never say that about shooting the U.S. President just the same as you would never scream the B word ( Bomb ) on the plane. You can agree to disagree with what President Bush has to say or do but never say the S word ( shooting the U.S. President ). The S.S. men have been known to beat suspects in the darkened interrogration room trying to obtain information to save lives. The Sercet Service takes their line of work very seriously, after all this is the President of the United States of America. Not a good idea to talk about the S word towards the U.S. President. Not very smart. :ugh:
 
Last edited:
This is who Steel wants for President

halleberry6to.jpg
 
Its funny...all these different 'sources' are the same article. Tell you what. Since you are 100% sure that President Bush is high on cocaine because of the way he moves his jaw, why don't you put together an article on his drug use and have it published. In fact, you write it, and I'll publish it for you on numerous sites.

Oh....please take a moment to do a little research. The 'credible' website that posted that article is actually owned by that writer....how is that credible.

Like I said, you write your article, I'll publish it on some sites and we'll call it credible, right?

Additionally, if you look a little further, the guy claims to have invented the internet (didn't we get enough of that from Gore). He also says he was the first person in the world to do a political website.
 
Last edited:
Taylor said:
Its funny...all these different 'sources' are the same article. Tell you what. Since you are 100% sure that President Bush is high on cocaine because of the way he moves his jaw, why don't you put together an article on his drug use and have it published. In fact, you write it, and I'll publish it for you on numerous sites.

Oh....please take a moment to do a little research. The 'credible' website that posted that article is actually owned by that writer....how is that credible.

Like I said, you write your article, I'll publish it on some sites and we'll call it credible, right?

Additionally, if you look a little further, the guy claims to have invented the internet (didn't we get enough of that from Gore). He also says he was the first person in the world to do a political website.
Click to expand...
Hey, Welcome back, Taylor!
:)
Lol, gosh, where do I start, hmm?
As far as I know, Capitol Hill Blue IS the first political website. I will eat my shoes if it is not. Why does owning a website lessen one's credibility? Apparently, winning awards is the kiss of death to it, judging from some coments in here.
Secondly, I have never heard of Doug Thompson claiming to have invented the internet. Where did you hear this? I'm curious...it doesn't sound like him.
Thirdly, Al Gore NEVER SAID he invented the internet. That is a GOP myth. The following link will explain what really happened.
http:www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,39301,00.html
And finally, I am still curious...As a cop, haven't you been around drug users? Haven't you seen those wiggly jaw movements among cocaine users? As I said, I used to be a Peer Counselor in Detox for Deafies, so I know what it looks like. I will stand by my words and insist that Bush is on SOMETHING, if not cocaine. Prove me wrong.
I am astonished that the so-called mainstream media does not discuss this. It is so obvious.
Again, Taylor, good to see you again. If my eyes were sore, you'd be a sight!
And by the way, feel free to publish this thread in any way you wish. You know me, I am utterly fearless.
;)
 
First,
Thank you for the welcome back, and I'm glad that we can have these types of conversations ;)

He claims to invent the internet on his own site. Him and his wife live in the Blue Ridge mountains (beautiful area btw) in the South Western part of Virginia. I'm familiar with the area and familiar with him. I'm not going to splash the guy's personal information from his other sites, but he does make a claim that he was behind the creation of the internet (He did work with transfering DARPANet from the Department of Defense to the National Science Foundation, the beginnings of the Internet).

To his credit, he has done some excellent work in the past. I'm surprised that he published this article as I generally don't see the 'rumor' tactics that he has used in this article. For what its worth, if a well known publisher had said the same thing, I'd given the same amount of credibility. For example, lets say Newseek, New York Post,etc had published the same story, I'd still be questioning what was behind it. An unclaimed source that overheard something in private just doesn't cut it for me.

Just as an example, lets say me and 3 other police officers from my department were pissed off at our chief. We could all claim that we overheard him say he hates black people (again, using this as an example..he has never made such claims). See what I'm getting at?
 
C.C.Sinned said:
halleberry6to.jpg
Click to expand...
oooh yes yes yes! :naughty:

*pants like a dog*



she has intellence in acting and she seems to be a good person with kids and all so if she likes kids, then she knows that kids are very important and use money properly for education, health care, and other things instead of wasting and stealing money on war, oil, and building more dams, factories, and other shit that would just be wasted on our country.
 
Spoken like a cop.
Deadpan style, was the chief jawbowning then?
 
Heath said:
Caution:

That is not very smart to say that about the U.S. President. What if the extremely serious Secret Service ( S.S. ) guys noticed that post then all of a sudden at 5:00 A.M. The U.S. Government bangs your door down with swarming SWAT guns and vicious dogs trained on you then they violently put you under arrest then you are in a van with no windows slammed shut then the S.S. agents punches your lights out then you wake up and struggle in cuffs and shout for help and tries to use American Sign Language ( ASL ) with cuffs on. You are under a single rolling dimmed light bulb and suddenly the S.S. agent roars into you and the shock of forgetting you had your hearing aids on frightens you even more because you never heard the sound of a man roaring like an angry and vicious animal....

" Why did you threaten to shoot the President of the United States of America ???!!!!???!!! "

He won't take No for an answer and you can not tell him you were joking or say sheesh ummm or even laugh at all.

This is an interrogration room where you could live or be dead.

That in itself is very frightening.

My advice : Never say that about shooting the U.S. President just the same as you would never scream the B word ( Bomb ) on the plane. You can agree to disagree with what President Bush has to say or do but never say the S word ( shooting the U.S. President ). The S.S. men have been known to beat suspects in the darkened interrogration room trying to obtain information to save lives. The Sercet Service takes their line of work very seriously, after all this is the President of the United States of America. Not a good idea to talk about the S word towards the U.S. President. Not very smart. :ugh:
Click to expand...


It's not like i'm the first to make some stupid threats like that and Bush already have alot of protection on him such as hundreds of agents, FBI, and other protective forces against terrorism and shit, and yet, he failed to let the government keep an eye on other countries that would be highly of a threat to the US, and it is the mddle east and yet they failed to stop them and let them pass, and go through plane school, buy knives and guns, then cover them in tons of plastic so that it won't be detected by metal dectors where they were so careless to think ANYTHING is possible when a gun or knife can go through a metal dector, and then ta-da! they hijacked planes and killed millions of other people and bush just sits there in elementary school reading books to children instead of jumping up and say "WTF?!?!" then runs off to the plane and hit the white house immediately like a serious president would...but did he do that? no so I dont care if he's a president or not, he has failed miserably to protect our country and I would never and I mean NEVER know why he got a second term. he has already lost my trust and respect years ago.

so no, I didn't mean to say to shoot the president but he would deserve that if he didn't respect our consitution which is very damned important to our country and if he didnt' respect our consitution and our country, then he is a TERRORIST himself!
 
There's also a joke about how Bush could be called King George III. I thought of it soon after the 2000 election and told a teacher in my high school. He said he already heard that joke. So people already thought of that joke. :eek2:

Here's how it goes:

George Washington
George H. W. Bush
George W. Bush

It's interesting how George Washington refrained from gathering lots of power like a king. Now there're plenty of people who'd call the second Bush King George the Third.
 
Back
Top