Is Obama bringing Americans together?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reba

Retired Terp
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
54,899
Reaction score
1,518
Is this how the President brings groups of Americans together? Or is this how he pits one group against another?

..."If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, 'We're gonna punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,' if they don't see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it's gonna be harder," Obama said....

Read more: Obama turns to 'Piolin' to rev up Latino vote - Politics | Tri-City Herald : Mid-Columbia news

Punish our enemies? Fellow Americans are enemies who should be punished? Whoa!


While campaigning in Woonsocket, RI,:

...he said, "we can't have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don't mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back."
Obama assails GOP on clouded final campaign push - Yahoo! News

Excuse me? Is this what Obama calls working together?

Does Obama have time for his presidential duties? He's been on the road campaigning for weeks.

He's not done yet (same above link):

...Obama was returning to the White House for a few days before resuming campaigning at week's end. His itinerary then will include Bridgeport, Conn., where party officials are hoping he can mobilize African-Americans whose votes are needed in races for the Senate and governor, as well as a re-election bid by Democratic Rep. Jim Himes.

Obama also will campaign in Pennsylvania, where polls show Rep. Joe Sestak in a close race with Republican Pat Toomey — for a Senate seat that Democrats currently hold. Similarly, there are numerous Democratic-held House seats in the state that Obama is working to hold.

Later stops are in Ohio, where Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland is struggling to win a new term against Republican challenger John Kasich, and the president's home state of Illinois, where polls show both a Senate seat and the governor's office are in danger of falling to the Republicans.
 
To be frank, I think it's everyone who are not willing to work together.
 
If Obama wants cooperation from Republicans it doesn't help if he refers to them as enemies who should sit at the back of the bus.
 
Would you prefer he work at the White House? Between all his golf and these campaigns, I find it surprising he finds time to make all these erroneous spending decisions.
I seem to recall that almost all Presidents go on the campaign trail for their respective parties. Since when is this newsworthy?
 
If Obama wants cooperation from Republicans it doesn't help if he refers to them as enemies who should sit at the back of the bus.
Is political rhetoric strictly a Democrat phenomena?
 
It appears that he's not so much campaigning for his own party members as he is campaigning against Republicans. Not very positive messages. (Re: Rhode Island)
 
If Obama wants cooperation from Republicans it doesn't help if he refers to them as enemies who should sit at the back of the bus.

Well, have you seen the politicians that are working for y'all these days? As far I am concerned, they don't care about y'all.
 
It appears that he's not so much campaigning for his own party members as he is campaigning against Republicans. Not very positive messages. (Re: Rhode Island)
That sums up politics the way it is done now. Almost all campaign ads are "he sucks more than I do" type of things. There is nothing positive about the current state of our two party system. Neither side is willing to work with the other side. That is why little gets done. If your party tries to pass a bill and the opposing party gets it blocked, the blockers are wrong. If the opposing party tries to pass a bill, and your party blocks it, they are heroes. Can you say stalemate?
 
That sums up politics the way it is done now. Almost all campaign ads are "he sucks more than I do" type of things. There is nothing positive about the current state of our two party system. Neither side is willing to work with the other side. That is why little gets done. If your party tries to pass a bill and the opposing party gets it blocked, the blockers are wrong. If the opposing party tries to pass a bill, and your party blocks it, they are heroes. Can you say stalemate?

At times, it's been so dysfunctional that I've entertained thoughts of overthrowing the government and I prefer the evolutionary approach to politics rather than the revolutionary approach. :shock:
 
Well, have you seen the politicians that are working for y'all these days? As far I am concerned, they don't care about y'all.

What it is like Canada, do the politicians care about y'all? I agree that the
politicians are really out for themselves .
 
Wirelessly posted

Canadian politicians are just as corrupted as Americans.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/gov_cor-government-corruption

Mind you, the index is based on how the citizens view their government as. The chart has nothing to do with actual corruption, which is impossible to measure accurately.
 
Would you prefer he work at the White House? Between all his golf and these campaigns, I find it surprising he finds time to make all these erroneous spending decisions.
I seem to recall that almost all Presidents go on the campaign trail for their respective parties. Since when is this newsworthy?
The newsworthy part is how Obama is not just campaigning for Democrat politicians but he is using race and meanness to drive Americans apart.
 
Since previous presidents were brought up, here's one for comparison of last week campaigning:

October 31, 2008
On the White House
A Presidential Vanishing Act, by Design
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

WASHINGTON — It’s the week before Election Day. Do you know where your president is?

Probably not, and that is by design. With Senator John McCain lagging behind in the polls and many other Republicans fighting for their political lives, the nation’s top Republican — President Bush — is intentionally lying low this week, and is likely to do so until after Americans cast their ballots to pick his successor.

Mr. Bush, an ardent student of politics, knows what it feels like to be down in the polls, and he is keeping a careful eye on the campaign. Earlier this week, he made a surprise visit to the headquarters of the Republican National Committee to offer thanks to those who have served him for the past eight years, and deliver a little pep talk to lift the spirits of beleaguered McCain supporters.

“He talked about how he was never supposed to win a campaign,” said one person who attended, speaking anonymously because the session was off-the-record. “He talked about how in ’94, 2000, 2004, they always said he had no chance, and he just encouraged us, to say it’s just important to keep doing what we’re doing and keep working hard.”

The message was not entirely surprising. What was striking is that Mr. Bush chose to deliver it in private. Presidential visits to campaign headquarters are routine business in election years; the day before voters cast their ballots in 2000, President Bill Clinton dropped in on Democratic headquarters in Little Rock, Ark. to buck up campaign volunteers, even as he conceded that he had no idea which way the race between Vice President Al Gore and Mr. Bush, then the governor of Texas, would go.

Mr. Bush, though, has made himself increasingly scarce as Election Day approaches. His campaign season effectively ended on Oct. 21 — two weeks before the election — when he attended his last political fund-raiser, a $1 million event for the Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee. (His wife, Laura, is still on the stump; on Thursday she headlined a get-out-the-vote rally in Mississippi.)

With Mr. Bush’s job approval ratings at historic lows, political analysts have long said Republican candidates simply do not want to be seen with him. But now, with the election just days away, it seems that Republican candidates do not want Mr. Bush to be seen, period.

“One of McCain’s biggest challenges has been how to deal with Bush, and he never quite got it right,” said Scott Reed, a Republican strategist who ran Bob Dole’s 1996 presidential campaign. “Now, the best thing is silence.”

So the president has temporarily dropped out of sight. Until recently, Mr. Bush was giving talks about the battered economy on nearly a daily basis, prompting some Republicans to grumble privately that so much presidential face time was hurting their election chances. This week, Mr. Bush stepped back, holding just four public events, none with real policy implications.

He hosted two foreign leaders, the presidents of Paraguay and the Kurdistan Regional Government, at the White House, stepping before the cameras for a total of 11 minutes. He gave the graduation speech at the F.B.I. Academy in Quantico, Va. And he and Mrs. Bush hosted a light-hearted celebration in honor of the 150th birthday of Theodore Roosevelt, complete with a bespectacled Roosevelt impersonator who looked about the East Room and commented wryly, “Well, I must say, I like what you’ve done with the place.”

Joe Lockhart, a former Clinton press secretary, said Mr. Bush’s absence from the public stage, though brief, had consequences. “This has an impact,” Mr. Lockhart said. “The world marches on; we’re in an economic crisis. We have tensions at home and abroad, yet I think if you walk down the street and ask people, ‘Has the president already left?’ you’d have a lot of people saying, ‘Yeah, I think so.’ ”

On Friday, Mr. Bush was to leave Washington at noon to spend the weekend at Camp David. Unlike elections past, he will not travel to his ranch in Crawford, Tex., to vote; casting his last ballot as president in person would almost certainly have drawn the sort of news coverage the White House might not want. Instead, the Bushes sought the privacy of absentee ballots this year, casting their votes for Mr. McCain by mail.

The couple will watch the election returns from the White House; Dana Perino, the White House press secretary, said the public would most likely hear from her, and not the president, on Tuesday night. To avoid getting drawn into a discussion about the race, Mr. Bush has steered clear of news conferences all fall; Ms. Perino would not say this week when reporters might get a chance to question the president directly about the outcome.

If the past is any guide, Mr. Bush will be matter-of-fact about the result. At the Roosevelt event, the president “seemed sort of fatalistic” about Mr. McCain’s chances and his own place in history, said Representative Peter King, Republican of New York, who was there. Mr. King said his wife grew emotional, telling the president how much she would miss him. Mr. Bush did not grow emotional in return.

“He just said, ‘Yeah, yeah,’ _ he seemed like, what happens, happens,” Mr. King said. “I always feel that he thinks it’s his job to keep everybody’s spirits up.’
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/31/us/politics/31web-stolberg.html
 
If Obama wants cooperation from Republicans it doesn't help if he refers to them as enemies who should sit at the back of the bus.

Both parties are dividing the country, and this does not help us . I am sick and tried listening to all the mudslinging on TV all the time. We have in my state a Republican threaten to sue a Democrat for spreading lies about him. And that same GOP guy had photo of Obama dress like a terrorist on his lawn. We have candidates acting like children running for office! And a candidate is saying she is not a witch and people should not masturbate , this election is like a three ring circus!
 
Both parties are dividing the country, and this does not help us . I am sick and tried listening to all the mudslinging on TV all the time. We have in my state a Republican threaten to sue a Democrat for spreading lies about him. And that same GOP guy had photo of Obama dress like a terrorist on his lawn. We have candidates acting like children running for office! And a candidate is saying she is not a witch and people should not masturbate , this election is like a three ring circus!

:gpost:
 
Has Obama changed his mind since he gave this speech?

...Now even as we speak, there are those who are preparing to divide us -- the spin masters, the negative ad peddlers who embrace the politics of "anything goes." Well, I say to them tonight, there is not a liberal America and a conservative America -- there is the United States of America. There is not a Black America and a White America and Latino America and Asian America -- there’s the United States of America....
American Rhetoric: Barack Obama -- 2004 Democratic National Convention Keynote Address
 
I agree that it was a poor choice of rhetoric, though keep in mind you're taking the words out of context. It's pretty easy to make anyone look bad when you take their words out of context.

But, this is hardly something unique to Obama or democrats. This is the nature of politics these days. Sickening.
 
I agree that it was a poor choice of rhetoric, though keep in mind you're taking the words out of context. It's pretty easy to make anyone look bad when you take their words out of context.

But, this is hardly something unique to Obama or democrats. This is the nature of politics these days. Sickening.
I provided links to the entire original context.

In these examples, I don't think those quotes would look good in any context.

For sure other politicians say mean or stupid things. However, we have only one President at a time, and he's the one setting the tone.
 
Is political rhetoric strictly a Democrat phenomena?

I seem to remember Obama being identified as the Muslim enemy that associated with terrorists during the last election. And it certainly wasn't a Dem doing the talking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top