Ind. Rep Senate candidate, Richard Mourdock

It doesn't matter, so I agree with US president about rape is rape, and Mourdock shouldn't make complicated statement about rape and the God at first place, it cause confusion to people.

I didn't find his statement confusing. Mourdock in no way claimed nor rape was a good thing. In fact he wasn't even discussing rape, he was discussing pregnancy caused by rape. Big difference.
 
He's just say "seems" so it may be true, or may be not true, when speaking to himself.

Reba - I disagree with your statement about God's plan.
I didn't say anything about what God's plan is. I simply quoted Mourdock, and he clearly stated that he was talking about the baby, not the rape.


"I think even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen," Mourdock said during Tuesday's Senate debate, choking up.

The subject is "when life begins" not rape.

After the debate, Mourdock further explained his comment.

"Are you trying to suggest somehow that God preordained rape, no I don't think that," said Mourdock, according to The Associated Press. "Anyone who would suggest that is just sick and twisted. No, that's not even close to what I said."

He's very clear. He said anyone who claims that he suggests that God preordained rape is "sick and twisted."

There you go.
 
If my future wife gets raped so I rather to have baby aborted and I don't want child to raised from my future wife and rapist's genes, period.
I'm sure you would respect your wife's opinion if she didn't agree with you.
 
It doesn't matter, so I agree with US president about rape is rape, and Mourdock shouldn't make complicated statement about rape and the God at first place, it cause confusion to people.
Mourdock didn't say rape isn't rape. There is no confusion except what you're trying to generate.
 
I didn't find his statement confusing. Mourdock in no way claimed nor rape was a good thing. In fact he wasn't even discussing rape, he was discussing pregnancy caused by rape. Big difference.

I disagree with you about confusing statement and Mourdock ALREADY mentioned about rape and the God.

That why Mourdock already got backfired and he should watch his word.
 
Who cares what Obama said about it? Mourdock spoke for himself.

I agree with Obama on Mourdock's statement over rape.

Mourdock didn't say rape isn't rape. There is no confusion except what you're trying to generate.

It is still RAPE is RAPE, when he used RAPE along with the God, so he got backfired and it is most gross statement that I have seen.
 
The rape cases are very emotional and I don't think it is good idea to debate about between abortion and rape. The rape, along with life in threat is good reason to have abortion.

Mourdock should reconsider before mention the word about between rape and the God that caused controversial to people and politicians so that how he got backfired on media. If you are in doubt about controversial so go to news and check it out. If still doubt so it is better to move on instead of strike my claim.

Those one is I clarified from 4 posts above contain endless argumentative.
 
I agree with Obama on Mourdock's statement over rape.
It has nothing to do with people misinterpreting what Mourdock said.


It is still RAPE is RAPE, when he used RAPE along with the God, so he got backfired and it is most gross statement that I have seen.
He never said that rape is not rape.

It's fair to debate what he says but it's not fair to make false statements about things he said.
 
The rape cases are very emotional and I don't think it is good idea to debate about between abortion and rape. The rape, along with life in threat is good reason to have abortion.

Mourdock should reconsider before mention the word about between rape and the God that caused controversial to people and politicians so that how he got backfired on media. If you are in doubt about controversial so go to news and check it out. If still doubt so it is better to move on instead of strike my claim.

Those one is I clarified from 4 posts above contain endless argumentative.

Media isn't writing because of confusion. Media is writing to cause confusion.

I am not even going into whether I agree with the statement or not.....only saying that it is a clear statement. Mourdock is discussing life caused by rape......not rape.
 
Why are you surprised? There is one rape victim in my family that happened in 20 years ago and it was extremely emotional.
I'm surprised that someone as liberal as you are wouldn't respect your wife's decision about what she would want to do about her pregnancy.
 
It has nothing to do with people misinterpreting what Mourdock said.

He never said that rape is not rape.

It's fair to debate what he says but it's not fair to make false statements about things he said.

You misunderstood my post. I didn't claim that Mourdock say "rape is not rape" or "rape is rape". I'm just saying - when Mourdock wants to say about between the God and rape, so I just see discussion as rape is rape, that what I'm speaking.
 
Hmm... I kinda expected what you would say... It's easy to hate children because you think they're nothing but "gross and disgusting". But, I don't hate them, considering it is not their fault for the father's crime. Same with the female victims as well.

But, what would you say if your future wife actually decides to keep the rapist's baby? Some women do...
 
I'm surprised that someone as liberal as you are wouldn't respect your wife's decision about what she would want to do about her pregnancy.

Do you think that I'm going marry to woman who is strict pro-life? That's very doubtful, really doubtful. I usually share my view when I meet with someone and help to know around.

There are people who are pro-life and think that rape should be good reason to have abortion, along with life in threat. You don't know about any feeling and emotional until you are victim of rape, so it was big deal for women.

There is Plan B, the alternative method to abortion but I'm more cautious about side effect, however it is up to women to make decision, also it is not bad experience to share with doctor.
 
Hmm... I kinda expected what you would say... It's easy to hate children because you think they're nothing but "gross and disgusting". But, I don't hate them, considering it is not their fault for the father's crime. Same with the female victims as well.

But, what would you say if your future wife actually decides to keep the rapist's baby? Some women do...

Updated - not know, too tough question.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top