Try one of the squeaky toys for her. A friend has a boxer and he loves those he'll hold it in his mouth and keep squeaking it lol
Yes she has some but killed the squeekers already, I got more new toys packed away I will get out soon. My other mutt Sparky ( my daughter has him, he is a jack russle mix) He will tear open anything with a squeeker and kill it...lol
Our Malti/Poo is terrific at disassembling any toy and thinks the object is to remove the squeaker.
I have resorted to tying two socks in a knot and making something that looks like a butterfly.
It's pretty, she loves to fetch it and play tug with it, and it's basically free to replace since everybody wears out socks. It's recycling!
It must be a Malti/Poo thing. Marley does the exact same thing. When I was watching my daughters dog I was surprised all his toys still had squeakers.
Yes, I feel sorry for Joey! Before we got the puppy he had a whole little family of sock monkeys made for dogs that he carried around and took care of.
I think she killed them all within a week.
Luckily he adjusted and plays with her now. It's really cute considering he is deaf/blind and pretty frail.
Yes she has some but killed the squeekers already, I got more new toys packed away I will get out soon. My other mutt Sparky ( my daughter has him, he is a jack russle mix) He will tear open anything with a squeeker and kill it...lol
Those breed DNA tests are worthless. People checked the breed that I'm involved with, and these dogs have something like a 20 generation pedigree on their dogs, basically as far back as shortly after WWII (when the dogs were saved from Hitler by being moved out of the country as fast as they could do it, the dogs were killed intentionally by the Nazis). Anyway, neither of the available DNA tests identified the breed. Also, the mixes that they said it could possibly be a mix of made no logical sense given the history of the breed. I think they had Boston Terrier and Boykin Spaniel as being in the breed makeup of a Vizsla.
The test found genes that just about every dog has and seems to have just chosen possibilities based on what is in their database, and the database of these tests is very limited. People do better guesses at what is in their dog's makeup by looking at what the dogs physically resemble. Showing two photos, straight on at the dog's face while sitting or standing, and a side photo of the dog standing, gets better answers than the DNA tests.
The tests are faddish and just not very accurate right now. Dogs are so closely related and the tests have limits on distinguishing between breeds.
There's actually a LOT of difference between dapple and brindle. Dapple is just the same as merle, you mate two dapples/merles and you can get deaf and blind dogs. That doesn't happen to brindles, unless you are breeding flashy boxers that have that big collar of white around their neck and on their chest and it can extend to the ears. If that patch of white extends into the ears, the boxer can be deaf. But a boxer deaf due to excessive flash is not the same as a double dapple/double merle being deaf and blind (sometimes actually eyeless).
She been lazy lately ...lol