Herman Cain Shrugs Off His Anita Hill Joke

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cain: Selected by God, immune to human scrutiny

By Jennifer Rubin


Herman Cain, when he launched his presidential campaign, had the benefit of being unaffected, cheery and candid. As his profile and poll numbers rose — and the criticism increased — some unattractive aspects of his personality have emerged, quite apart from whatever you think of the allegations of the four women accusers.

For one thing, there is now a Newt Gingrich-like indignation about scrutiny by the media. The New York Post reports:

[In Friday’s] radio interview, Cain said he was now under extraordinary scrutiny.

“I call it flyspecking. Every word I say now is going to be flyspecked by somebody, and somebody who does not support Herman Cain, they’re going to try to spin it into a negative,” Cain said.

It’s extraordinary, actually, that this should come as a surprise to him, and a disagreeable one at that. He is, at least ostensibly, running for the presidency. Was he perhaps expecting a coronation, rather than a contested election in which his positions, experience, gaffes and character are all considered (at least by everyone else) to be fair game? Does he imagine that only positive commentary should come his way, or that criticism from people who don’t support Herman Cain (there’s that third-party usage again) is somehow illegitimate?

This hostility toward criticism perhaps is understandable, since he contends God selected him. He seems to mean this quite literally, as opposed to the sentiment that he “found his calling” or that he prayed for God’s guidance.

The National Journal reports:

Herman Cain, whose campaign could use some redemption in the wake of a sexual harassment scandal, told a crowd of young Republicans on Saturday that God convinced him to run for president and that he “prayed and prayed and prayed” about it.

The Republican contender made no mention of the allegations from former subordinates at the National Restaurant Association. But his comments here were accented with more than the usual references to his faith and his calling to politics.

“I prayed and prayed and prayed. I’m a man of faith, I had to do a lot of praying for this one, more praying than I’d ever done before in my life. And when I finally realized that it was God saying that this is what I needed to do, I was like Moses. ‘You’ve got the wrong man, Lord. Are you sure?’ ” Cain told a crowd of over 100 people at the Young Republican National Federation, an event hosted by the Georgia Young Republicans at the Westin Peachtree Plaza.

No mention was made of a burning bush.

This is more than a little troublesome. Pols who think they’re selected by God naturally would think they are above criticism, and, I suppose, would consider those seeking to block his nomination as apostates. And what does that say of his opponents: They are confused if they think they too were chosen? Or are they acting contrary to God’s will in blocking his path?

From the get-go, Cain has shown an indifference to what Americans have come to regard as essential qualifications for the presidency — a working knowledge of public policy, a track record in the public sector and a professional campaign that reflects his organizational prowess. What most would regard as a lack of qualifications, he dresses up as groundbreaking. But if one is so arrogant to believe that one has won the God primary, all of this is irrelevant, I suppose.

Cain has escaped deserved criticism from many on the right who have been charmed by him or felt compelled to defend the not-Obama, non-racial narrative that was central to his original message. But perhaps it’s time for them to consider whether his expressed self-image — if not “a sort of God,” then “designated by God” — and his lack of basic knowledge should be taken as a flashing red light. Conservatives, of all people, should be wary of a presidential contender whose messiah complex is entirely at odds with his abilities.

By Jennifer Rubin | 09:00 AM ET, 11/13/2011

Cain: Selected by God, immune to human scrutiny - Right Turn - The Washington Post

And this comes from a journalist who writes from the conservative perspective.:hmm:
 
And if you're not going to vote for one of the Republican candidate then why the need for you to worry for us? You can disagree all you want but if you're not going to vote for one of the current Republican candidates then there is no vested interest for you to comment.

You don't vote for the Democratic candidates, but you feel an obsessive need to comment on them. Double standards? Or just sour grapes because your gods are being dethroned?
 
How would Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain protect the southern border? By building a border fence – and electrifying it. Cain apparently believes that undocumented workers looking for a better life for their families deserve to be treated as livestock, and even injured or killed.

Denounce Herman Cain

Electrified fences, waterboarding, sexual harrassment, and promoting violence by making remarks about beating people with a cane. Yep, God choose this guy, all right.:roll:
 
...No mention was made of a burning bush.
Is that supposed to be funny?

This is more than a little troublesome. Pols who think they’re selected by God naturally would think they are above criticism, and, I suppose, would consider those seeking to block his nomination as apostates. And what does that say of his opponents: They are confused if they think they too were chosen? Or are they acting contrary to God’s will in blocking his path?
Anyone who has studied the Bible knows that when God does call someone to do something, that person should expect to go thru lots of opposition and many trials. Not one person who has been called by God has had an easy path. It's just the opposite.

Also, just because someone believes God has called him to campaign for office doesn't mean that he's been called to win the election. It could be that the campaign by itself was the mission. It could be a test of faith. We don't know.

...But if one is so arrogant to believe that one has won the God primary, all of this is irrelevant, I suppose.
I haven't read anything that asserts that Cain has said that.

Cain has escaped deserved criticism from many on the right who have been charmed by him or felt compelled to defend the not-Obama, non-racial narrative that was central to his original message. But perhaps it’s time for them to consider whether his expressed self-image — if not “a sort of God,” then “designated by God” — and his lack of basic knowledge should be taken as a flashing red light. Conservatives, of all people, should be wary of a presidential contender whose messiah complex is entirely at odds with his abilities.
I don't see a messiah complex in Cain but neither is he my candidate for President.

It seems odd to me that if he's such a poor candidate and has no chance of winning the Republican nomination much less the Presidential election, why is so much effort being put into attacking him? :hmm:
 
Is that supposed to be funny?


Anyone who has studied the Bible knows that when God does call someone to do something, that person should expect to go thru lots of opposition and many trials. Not one person who has been called by God has had an easy path. It's just the opposite.

Also, just because someone believes God has called him to campaign for office doesn't mean that he's been called to win the election. It could be that the campaign by itself was the mission. It could be a test of faith. We don't know.


I haven't read anything that asserts that Cain has said that.


I don't see a messiah complex in Cain but neither is he my candidate for President.

It seems odd to me that if he's such a poor candidate and has no chance of winning the Republican nomination much less the Presidential election, why is so much effort being put into attacking him? :hmm:

You'll have to ask the journalist from the Right that wrote it. Personally, yeah, I found it humorous.

If you haven't read anything that asserts that Cain has said anything like that, it is probably because you are failing to read the information available.

Attacking? This is not attacking. It is exposing, and then having a laugh.
 
Umm, no. It shows humility. Like Moses, Cain didn't feel worthy of his calling by God. According to him, his natural inclination was not to run for President.

Cain didn't say that God told him he would win.

Humility? :shock: Huh? Actually, this is one of the clinical definitions of insane behavior.

Correct. He could probably end up not getting the nomination but still he took that path which in turn helped spread his message. Paths are never what it seems in life and can be a strange one.

I know exactly where his path is leading. . . .

A Christian should never make a career move without seeking God's will thru prayer.

I'm not saying that's what happened in Cain's situation but that's the common procedure. A Christian prays for God's will, and often struggles when he gets it.

How exactly does God let a Christian know his will? Does one hear his voice? Does he materialize and give directions? Does he drop a leaf from the sky and create a metaphor? Does the magic 8-ball come into focus?

This is a legitimate question. I'm really curious how this "God's will" stuff works.

Good comeback. :eek3:

My point was, most of those prisoners have been in the system for years, OBL moved a few times to avoid capture. How would they be updated on his new location?

SILENCE! Do not inject logic into this conversation!!!!

And if you're not going to vote for one of the Republican candidate then why the need for you to worry for us? You can disagree all you want but if you're not going to vote for one of the current Republican candidates then there is no vested interest for you to comment.

H Y P O C R I T E
 
You'll have to ask the journalist from the Right that wrote it. Personally, yeah, I found it humorous.
Not everyone finds mocking religions to be humorous.

If you haven't read anything that asserts that Cain has said anything like that, it is probably because you are failing to read the information available.
I doubt it. If there was anything available that you could post in an attempt to make Cain look bad, you'd do it. Apparently it doesn't exist.

Attacking? This is not attacking. It is exposing, and then having a laugh.
It's only exposing if something is there.
 
My point was, most of those prisoners have been in the system for years, OBL moved a few times to avoid capture. How would they be updated on his new location?

SILENCE! Do not inject logic into this conversation!!!!

Oh geez. Time for my nap. :sadwave:
And if you're not going to vote for one of the Republican candidate then why the need for you to worry for us? You can disagree all you want but if you're not going to vote for one of the current Republican candidates then there is no vested interest for you to comment.


H Y P O C R I T E

I was gonna say, it never stopped our resident Conservatives from turning over every stone, for every Democrat, looking for incriminating evidence that they are all actually convicted felons. I thought that was what politics had become; a series of unearthing behavioral issues, followed by the other side defending them from whatever was uncovered. Nothing about how good my guy is, just how bad the other guy is.

The reason Liberals are doing this awful thing; look at the byline of FoxNews. Something about "fair and balanced" reporting.
 
Not everyone finds mocking religions to be humorous.


I doubt it. If there was anything available that you could post in an attempt to make Cain look bad, you'd do it. Apparently it doesn't exist.


It's only exposing if something is there.

We aren't mocking religions. We are pointing out religious delusions.

Personally, I think Cain comparing himself to Moses is mocking religion.

It's there. All over the news.
 
We aren't mocking religions. We are pointing out religious delusions.

Personally, I think Cain comparing himself to Moses is mocking religion.

It's there. All over the news.
Well, since you are Agnostic, to my knowledge, why would you question Reba, an avowed Christian, on what her Biblical interpretations were? Just curious.
 
Well, since you are Agnostic, to my knowledge, why would you question Reba, an avowed Christian, on what her Biblical interpretations were? Just curious.

First off, I did not question Reba on her Biblical interpretations. Secondly, I have never disclosed my particular spiritual belief system on AD. Thirdly, if I were an agnostic, it is the nature of the the agnostic to question. That is why they are agnostic.
 
CAIN: "I will trust the judgment of our military leaders to determine what is torture and what is not torture. That is the critical consideration."

CAIN: "I would return to that policy (waterboarding). I don't see it as torture. I see it as an enhanced interrogation technique."

THE FACTS: Cain's conclusion that waterboarding is a legitimate means of interrogation contradicts the judgment of military leaders _ and his own statement that he would be guided by them. The Army Field Manual prohibits waterboarding. It was the CIA, with the approval of the White House and Justice Department that conducted waterboarding, not the armed forces. As president, Cain could certainly decide that interrogators need not be constrained by the Army Field Manual rules. But if he did so, he would not be letting military leaders determine the tactics.

RealClearPolitics - Politics - Nov 13, 2011 - EDITOR'S NOTE _ An occasional look at how well politicians' statements adhere to the facts.
 
CAIN: "I will trust the judgment of our military leaders to determine what is torture and what is not torture. That is the critical consideration."

CAIN: "I would return to that policy (waterboarding). I don't see it as torture. I see it as an enhanced interrogation technique."

THE FACTS: Cain's conclusion that waterboarding is a legitimate means of interrogation contradicts the judgment of military leaders _ and his own statement that he would be guided by them. The Army Field Manual prohibits waterboarding. It was the CIA, with the approval of the White House and Justice Department that conducted waterboarding, not the armed forces. As president, Cain could certainly decide that interrogators need not be constrained by the Army Field Manual rules. But if he did so, he would not be letting military leaders determine the tactics.

RealClearPolitics - Politics - Nov 13, 2011 - EDITOR'S NOTE _ An occasional look at how well politicians' statements adhere to the facts.
I think I see why Shel's hubby wouldn't trust him if he were in the military.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top