Roadrunner
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2003
- Messages
- 7,075
- Reaction score
- 2
Boxcutters generally could be considered more lethal as they're less visible and easier to conceal, much easier to take it anywhere than it would be for carrying a firearm. Boxcutters can do quite of a bit of considerable damage, even some firearms could splatter your guts or intestines outwardly with the kind of bullets that could do more physical harm, etc....
I used to carry a boxcutter all the time, as it was a valuable tool to use, nowadays, I'm more careful of where-ever I go to, and whether it's safe or not to be carrying it in my pockets, knowing that there is a different outlook or regard to boxcutters...which I do not intend to have others think differently for having it on me....
I used to carry a boxcutter all the time, as it was a valuable tool to use, nowadays, I'm more careful of where-ever I go to, and whether it's safe or not to be carrying it in my pockets, knowing that there is a different outlook or regard to boxcutters...which I do not intend to have others think differently for having it on me....

...as I'm not quite sure what the law stipulates in relation to firearms and boxcutters/knifes...but don't it make logical sense that armed with firearms with a malicious intent carries a far more heavier sentence than in possession of a boxcutter/knife? Although, the 'act' of the crime itself would be imposed as the same when found guilty and sentenced....