Former street preacher gets life in Smart case

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,425
Reaction score
551
SALT LAKE CITY – Elizabeth Smart says she was thrilled with the two life sentences given to the man who kidnapped her from the bedroom of her Utah home nearly nine years ago.

Smart said at a news conference Wednesday after the hearing that she fully believes defendant David Brian Mitchell knew exactly what he was doing when he abducted and raped her, despite arguments by his lawyers for years that he was mentally incompetent to stand trial.

She says the sentencing, which came on National Missing Children's Day, marks the end of a long chapter in her life as well as a beautiful new beginning.

She says she wants to work to help bring other missing children back to their families and see the abductors brought to justice.

A jury unanimously convicted the 57-year-old Mitchell in December of kidnapping and unlawful transportation of a minor across state lines for sex.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP

Nearly nine years after she was abducted at knifepoint from her bed, Elizabeth Smart watched Wednesday without showing any emotion as a federal judge ordered a street preacher to spend the rest of his life in prison for kidnapping and raping her while holding her captive for months.

The sentencing of Brian David Mitchell closed a major legal chapter in the heartbreaking ordeal that stalled for years after Mitchell was declared mentally ill and unfit to stand trial in state court.

"I know that you know what you did is wrong," Smart told Mitchell, who sang quietly in the courtroom. "You took away nine months of my life that can never be returned."

Dressed in a gray striped skirt and yellow blouse, Smart took the witness stand for only about 30 seconds and confronted her abductor in court for the first time since the abduction ended.

She appeared poised and composed, speaking in even tones without showing emotion as she directed her comments at Mitchell.

"I have a wonderful life," she said. "You will never affect me again."

Mitchell did not respond when U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball handed down two life sentences at the hearing in Salt Lake City.

Afterward, Smart smiled and hugged family members and her lawyers.

A jury unanimously convicted the 57-year-old Mitchell in December of kidnapping and unlawful transportation of a minor across state lines for sex.

With long hair and beard, Mitchell looked frail and thin in court. He sang throughout the proceedings, even when the judge asked if he wanted to speak.

The prosecution had sought the life sentences. The defense waived its closing remarks.

Smart was 14 when she was snatched from the bedroom of her family home in Salt Lake City. Wednesday was the first time she faced her kidnapper in court; he was removed from the trial for singing hymns when she testified.

Now 23, she testified in excruciating detail about waking up in the early hours of June 5, 2002, to the feel of a cold, jagged knife at her throat and being whisked away by Mitchell to his camp in the foothills near the family home.

Within hours of the kidnapping, she testified, she was stripped of her favorite red pajamas, draped in white, religious robes and forced into a polygamous marriage with Mitchell. She was tethered to a metal cable strung between two trees and subjected to near-daily rapes while being forced to use alcohol and drugs.

The disappearance and a massive search to find the blond-haired, blue-eyed girl riveted the nation, as did her improbable recovery while walking with her captor on a suburban Salt Lake City-area street on March 12, 2003.

Smart was a steady, clear-voiced trial witness who never wavered with emotion, even as she described the horrific events of what she called her "nine months of hell."

She recalled being forced to live homeless, dress in disguises and stay quiet or lie about her identity if ever approached by strangers or police. Daily, her life and those of her family members were threatened by Mitchell, she has said.

On Wednesday, her father spoke to the man who kidnapped his daughter

Exploitation of religion is not a defense," Ed Smart said. "You put Elizabeth through nine months of psychological hell."

The facts of the case have never been in dispute, but defense attorneys have said Mitchell's actions were tainted by mental illness and long-held delusional beliefs that he had been commanded by God to fulfill important prophecies.

Smart, who described her captor as vulgar and self-serving, testified that she believed Mitchell was driven by his desire for sex, drugs and alcohol, not by any sincere religious beliefs.

"Nine months of living with him and seeing him proclaim that he was God's servant and called to do God's work and everything he did to me and my family is something that I know that God would not tell somebody to do," Smart said during the trial.

Much of the case has turned on questions over Mitchell's mental health. In federal court he was deemed competent for trial, but a parallel state case — where he remains charged with six felonies — stalled after a judge twice determined he was unfit and rejected a petition for forced treatment.

Mitchell finally stood trial after a key witness for federal prosecutors, New York forensic psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner, concluded Mitchell was "malingering" or faking a mental disorder to avoid prosecution.

Defense attorneys maintain Mitchell needs psychiatric attention and asked the judge to recommend incarceration in a federal prison hospital rather than a standard prison.

Wanda Barzee, Mitchell's estranged wife and a co-defendant in the case, is already serving a 15-year sentence in a federal prison hospital in Texas for her role in the kidnapping.

Barzee, 65, pleaded guilty to federal kidnapping and unlawful transportation charges in November 2009. Upon her release, Barzee is expected to be transferred to the Utah State Prison to serve a sentence on a conviction in a companion case involving the attempted abduction in 2002 of Smart's cousin.

Former street preacher gets life in Smart case - Yahoo! News
 
Well..."CHEERS"!...So much for those psycharist's who claimed Mitchell was "mentally ill"...and should spend/serve his time in a prison "hospital" instead of a "standard prison"....

Seems his "singing in court"...wasn't up to "American Idol's" standards!...truly, Mitchell is an evil man....and the best is yet to come....other prisoners are anxiously "awaiting with baited breath" for their "new reisdent"!....Guess he will be singing "a different tune" then...

God Bless America! Justice was served in this case, inasmuch as the pain this girl endured....
 
Well..."CHEERS"!...So much for those psycharist's who claimed Mitchell was "mentally ill"...and should spend/serve his time in a prison "hospital" instead of a "standard prison"....

Seems his "singing in court"...wasn't up to "American Idol's" standards!...truly, Mitchell is an evil man....and the best is yet to come....other prisoners are anxiously "awaiting with baited breath" for their "new reisdent"!....Guess he will be singing "a different tune" then...

God Bless America! Justice was served in this case, inasmuch as the pain this girl endured....

How exactly, is this man going to prison for a life sentence going to take away what she suffered?

Not that I don't agree that he deserves a life sentence. I am just curious as to how you define justice.
 
How exactly, is this man going to prison for a life sentence going to take away what she suffered?

Not that I don't agree that he deserves a life sentence. I am just curious as to how you define justice.

I am more concerned that Elizabeth showed NO emotions. :shock:

No amount of punishment will give this girl what was taken from her back. I agree.

but.......I am glad to see this man off the streets so he can not do this again to another child. So I think justice was done by getting this man off and keeping him off the streets.
 
I am more concerned that Elizabeth showed NO emotions. :shock:

No amount of punishment will give this girl what was taken from her back. I agree.

but.......I am glad to see this man off the streets so he can not do this again to another child. So I think justice was done by getting this man off and keeping him off the streets.

I agree. Her lack of emotion disturbed me, as well. She no doubt has a ways to go in integrating her experiences. It will be years for her to come to terms, I'm sure.

I, too, am glad that he is off the streets. However, there is no winner in this situation. It disturbs me that people seem to feel it necessary to celebrate a negative outcome to an already negative situation.:hmm:
 
How exactly, is this man going to prison for a life sentence going to take away what she suffered?

Not that I don't agree that he deserves a life sentence. I am just curious as to how you define justice.

He got (2) life sentences (as per the story)...And of course, a life sentence "isn't gonna take away what she suffered."....Do you want to give her "therapy" to see if you can change that??...No amount of your therapy is going to!

But isn't it beter than "a prison hospital"...where he'll receive "therapy" and even possibly be "cured" and let go???????..Or worse yet, mainly your "way of thinking Mitchell "needs therapy"...he's mentally ill......and a "cure"....and here you are trying to "rain on my parade"!...Not gonna happen....

As far as "justice"...2 life sentences...in a prison where other prisoners are gonna be able to get their hands on him, and make his life a living hell, which he's probably gonna think...even "beg" for the death sentence.

You're "sooooo good" at twisting words, Jillio, even as much as I respect and admire you (at times)....
 
I agree. Her lack of emotion disturbed me, as well. She no doubt has a ways to go in integrating her experiences. It will be years for her to come to terms, I'm sure.

I, too, am glad that he is off the streets. However, there is no winner in this situation. It disturbs me that people seem to feel it necessary to celebrate a negative outcome to an already negative situation.:hmm:

"Celebrate a "negative" outcome to an "already negative situation"....hmmmm..

Would you "celebrate" if they let the man go?..."Ahhh, he's "mentally ill, sick"...."needs therapy"....put him into a "prison hospital"...and a "cure" will come about, then we can release him back onto the streets....
 
He got (2) life sentences (as per the story)...And of course, a life sentence "isn't gonna take away what she suffered."....Do you want to give her "therapy" to see if you can change that??...No amount of your therapy is going to!

But isn't it beter than "a prison hospital"...where he'll receive "therapy" and even possibly be "cured" and let go???????..Or worse yet, mainly your "way of thinking Mitchell "needs therapy"...he's mentally ill......and a "cure"....and here you are trying to "rain on my parade"!...Not gonna happen....

As far as "justice"...2 life sentences...in a prison where other prisoners are gonna be able to get their hands on him, and make his life a living hell, which he's probably gonna think...even "beg" for the death sentence.

You're "sooooo good" at twisting words, Jillio, even as much as I respect and admire you (at times)....

If he were convicted to a life sentence in a forensic mental hospital, he would not be "let go." That is a misperception many of the public have. In fact, when one is sentenced to a forensic mental hospital, the usually end up doing more time than if they went to prison.

So, you are a believer in retributive justice, or the desire for revenge on some level?
 
"Celebrate a "negative" outcome to an "already negative situation"....hmmmm..

Would you "celebrate" if they let the man go?..."Ahhh, he's "mentally ill, sick"...."needs therapy"....put him into a "prison hospital"...and a "cure" will come about, then we can release him back onto the streets....

Yes, I find it sad that people are so vindictive that they celebrate a tragic outcome to a tragic situation.

Please see my above post regarding incarceration in a forensic mental hospital. You really should inform yourself of the way these things work. Perhaps you would be less inclinded to make errors about these issues.
 
Yes, I find it sad that people are so vindictive that they celebrate a tragic outcome to a tragic situation.

Please see my above post regarding incarceration in a forensic mental hospital. You really should inform yourself of the way these things work. Perhaps you would be less inclinded to make errors about these issues.

Oh, jeez!...and whooopie-do!..."Miss Perfect" huh?....why not go to a "forensic mental hospital" and see if you can give him therapy...come back here...and say he's "cured".

He's gonna be in "a standard prison environment"....not "isolated" from other prisoners...Makes you wonder why, don't it?.....no need to wonder!...The other prisoners will have "access to this man".....In a "hospital", they're gonna shield him as if he was the President....as if ... "don't touch our star "pupil"...we're studying him.

There is and always have been "a code of honor" in Prison....and this man, Mitchell, is a "marked man".....He knows it...isn't that the reason he was "singing" during his trial....thinking he would get off by going to a "hospital" and claiming "he's mentally ill and sick".....than having to be sentenced to a "standard prison environment??

As for as "my revenge"...what about Elizabeth Smart's revenge?....She "was happy" of the trial outcome...more than likely went out to eat with family/friends.....She "knew" this man was not mentally ill or even "sick"....
 
How typical... trying to make himself look insane by singing. :roll:

Glad they found him guilty!
 
Oh, jeez!...and whooopie-do!..."Miss Perfect" huh?....why not go to a "forensic mental hospital" and see if you can give him therapy...come back here...and say he's "cured".

He's gonna be in "a standard prison environment"....not "isolated" from other prisoners...Makes you wonder why, don't it?.....no need to wonder!...The other prisoners will have "access to this man".....In a "hospital", they're gonna shield him as if he was the President....as if ... "don't touch our star "pupil"...we're studying him.

There is and always have been "a code of honor" in Prison....and this man, Mitchell, is a "marked man".....He knows it...isn't that the reason he was "singing" during his trial....thinking he would get off by going to a "hospital" and claiming "he's mentally ill and sick".....than having to be sentenced to a "standard prison environment??

As for as "my revenge"...what about Elizabeth Smart's revenge?....She "was happy" of the trial outcome...more than likely went out to eat with family/friends.....She "knew" this man was not mentally ill or even "sick"....

Wow! You really are bitter about something.

I didn't see Elizabeth Smartt yelling, CHEERS! at the decision. As a matter of fact, she was very subdued in her response. I daresay, she was probably not seeking revenge. She was seeking, perhaps, procedural justice, which is an entirely different concept and mind set. She got what she was seeking, and stated that she was happy at the outcome. She did not celebrate the decision. Never once, during the entire time this case has been going on, has she been quoted as making any statement that would indicate that she was seeking revenge of any kind.
 
Wow! You really are bitter about something.

I didn't see Elizabeth Smartt yelling, CHEERS! at the decision. As a matter of fact, she was very subdued in her response. I daresay, she was probably not seeking revenge. She was seeking, perhaps, procedural justice, which is an entirely different concept and mind set. She got what she was seeking, and stated that she was happy at the outcome. She did not celebrate the decision. Never once, during the entire time this case has been going on, has she been quoted as making any statement that would indicate that she was seeking revenge of any kind.

Actually, as the story stated...Elizabeth Smart was "THRILLED"!... and stated in court, addressing Mitchell...."that he could not hurt her anymore!...

She said:....."I know that you know what you did is wrong," Smart told Mitchell, who sang quietly in the courtroom. "You took away nine months of my life that can never be returned."

Dressed in a gray striped skirt and yellow blouse, Smart took the witness stand for only about 30 seconds and confronted her abductor in court for the first time since the abduction ended.

She appeared poised and composed, speaking in even tones without showing emotion as she directed her comments at Mitchell.

"I have a wonderful life," she said. "You will never affect me again."

And...YOU...Jillio...are the one who brought up the WORD....REVENGE....

Again...twisting things in your own small mind...and acting the way you do...towards those who disagree with you....who's the one who's acting BITTER??...Sure isn't me!..I'm very happy, even thrilled...the verdict came out the way it did.

Mitchell got exactly what he deserved...and like Elizabeth Smart..."I'M THRILLED!"....She will no longer have to go to court to testify against this ANIMAL...or even face him...and perhaps the Media will now let her slip quietly away and leave her alone.
 
Actually, as the story stated...Elizabeth Smart was "THRILLED"!... and stated in court, addressing Mitchell...."that he could not hurt her anymore!...

She said:....."I know that you know what you did is wrong," Smart told Mitchell, who sang quietly in the courtroom. "You took away nine months of my life that can never be returned."

Dressed in a gray striped skirt and yellow blouse, Smart took the witness stand for only about 30 seconds and confronted her abductor in court for the first time since the abduction ended.

She appeared poised and composed, speaking in even tones without showing emotion as she directed her comments at Mitchell.

"I have a wonderful life," she said. "You will never affect me again."

And...YOU...Jillio...are the one who brought up the WORD....REVENGE....

Again...twisting things in your own small mind...and acting the way you do...towards those who disagree with you....who's the one who's acting BITTER??...Sure isn't me!..I'm very happy, even thrilled...the verdict came out the way it did.

Mitchell got exactly what he deserved...and like Elizabeth Smart..."I'M THRILLED!"....She will no longer have to go to court to testify against this ANIMAL...or even face him...and perhaps the Media will now let her slip quietly away and leave her alone.

Thrilled, happy, whatever; that is still not indicative if her celebrating. Nor is it indicative of her seeking revenge. In fact, everything you have just posted is indicative of seeking procedural justice, not retributive justice.

Yep, you are acting pretty bitter about something. I guess only you knows what that is.
 
Thrilled, happy, whatever; that is still not indicative if her celebrating. Nor is it indicative of her seeking revenge. In fact, everything you have just posted is indicative of seeking procedural justice, not retributive justice.

Yep, you are acting pretty bitter about something. I guess only you knows what that is.

:laugh2: :laugh2:..Feeling bitter, Jillio?...Wanting revenge?....Like I said...have YOU ever considered THERAPY?....
 
:laugh2: :laugh2:..Feeling bitter, Jillio?...Wanting revenge?....Like I said...have YOU ever considered THERAPY?....

Nope, I'm not vengeful in the least.:cool2: And I already answered that question in another thread. The fact that you asked it again here, after already having been given the answer, is pretty indicative of someone wanting revenge, however.
 
Nope, I'm not vengeful in the least.:cool2: And I already answered that question in another thread. The fact that you asked it again here, after already having been given the answer, is pretty indicative of someone wanting revenge, however.

well...spit it out!...since you're so sure that it's indicative that I'm wanting "revenge"....And you're not "vengeful"?...How did you come to that diagnosis? :giggle:
 
well...spit it out!...since you're so sure that it's indicative that I'm wanting "revenge"....And you're not "vengeful"?...How did you come to that diagnosis? :giggle:

It is not a diagnosis. It is an observation. The very fact that you already have your answer, and yet asked the question again in a disparaging manner shows it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
 
It is not a diagnosis. It is an observation. The very fact that you already have your answer, and yet asked the question again in a disparaging manner shows it beyond a shadow of a doubt.

An observation, huh?....:giggle:...:roll: ....

Oh well....I'm THRILLED this case is over and done...I'm ELATED the animal got what he deserved....I'm HAPPY Elizabeth can try to move on in any way that she can possibly can....
 
Back
Top