Fragmenter
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2006
- Messages
- 822
- Reaction score
- 0
gnulinuxman said:I am going to murder your post by saying that deaf people are more capable than you just said they were.
I give up. You missed the point one too many time.
gnulinuxman said:I am going to murder your post by saying that deaf people are more capable than you just said they were.
deaflinuxgeek said:If you are such a know-it-all on deaf culture and its people then why are you looking for help? Really I researched long and hard to find that and if you want proof give me a day and I'll have it.
I knkow its 15%
Deaflinuxgeek

.The point is I wish every deaf people could read and write English at a sastifactory level so we wouldn't have so many misunderstandings

As for your English, you don't capitalize most of your sentences, you join sentences with commas where you should use semicolons, and some of your posts are littered with typos.
I agree but I have an excuse- English is my second langauge, self taught, and often I have migraine when typing- what's yours?

gnulinuxman said:You probably have some of the worst arguing and English skills I've ever seen in my LIFE. People are probably just supporting you because you're an older lady and the mother of someone else on this board.
I have YET to see ANY original argument from you on this board that wasn't a personal attack.
Sweetmind said:Closed caption doesnt work with ASL movies...because Closed caption is English. Its ruins the image of ASL. It ruins the true language of plays in video. There is a difference between English and ASL. Heearing people CODA know the difference. That is the purpose for it. If you really want to understand you should hire an oral speaking interpreter, dont try to change ASL thats the way it is.

Think of it not as captions (a transliteration of the dialogue) but as subtitles (translation). Many foreign movies and TV shows have made it here in the US, and lots of hearing people consider subbed movies (i.e., original language audio, with English subtitles) to be far superior to dubbed movies (with audio re-recorded in English). Don't want to watch the subtitles? Just turn 'em off. Or heck, if it's already voice interpreted, why not caption the interpreter?
Now, whether or not we have the right to insist that videos like Wann's be subtitled or captioned is debatable. But I think it's pretty clear that it's not impossible to have well-done subtitles on a video like this.
The reason why we dont want to have CC is because people need to learn how to read their body language and facial expressions..it needs to be recognized that this is a part of our language.

SweetMind said:After all you dont understand what i m trying to imply on this topic post.. Some of you are acting childish and dont have any manners towards some of us who like to debate with adult behaviors. You just want to destroy my topic, that is nothing new. It shows what I know when I got so many people pushing me down for a very stupid reason.

Fragmenter said:Of. Course. I. Needed. To. Do. Research. On. Cochlear. Implants. Because. I. Grew. Up. In. The. Deaf. Community. And. Never. Paid. Attention. To. Cochlear. Implants.
Understand?
Fact: many deaf people in the deaf community struggles with English. Way more than 15%
How do I know this? Out of my freshman class, only 4 of us made the elite English class at Gallaudet. They were going to make us to write for the school newspaper eventually. 4 out of, what, 100? I know only a handful of students made the Advanced English class and the remaining students took their basic English classes.
Brief background on my life: I instantly made friends with deaf people who had great understanding of the English language because we could communicate on a deeper level. Believe me, we've had countless conversations regarding the Deaf and their struggles with literacy. I shouldn't be saying this but I'm so sick and tired of your boyfriend's propaganda.
I worked my ass off at English even though it's my second language. You guys are beyond comprehension.
The point is I wish every deaf people could read and write English at a sastifactory level so we wouldn't have so many misunderstandings. If you think I'm ashamed of or looking down at us -- you couldn't be more wrong.
I am ending this squabble with you, GNU, because it's getting too personal and I'm starting to entertain the thought of five minutes with you in an enclosed room. I'm better than that so have a nice life not ever opening your mind to the world. I hope someday you'll wake up, son.
![]()
Yeah, this article explains this pretty well:Sweetmind said:We deaf people need to work toegether but look at yourself that you dont want to work together for our Deaf children s sakes. I cannot do it alone that is the problem that are too bloody passive to work together and alot of them are like.. oh well..no one will ever listen to us anyways as you know.
I just cannot believe deaf children should be implanted. I believe it is a form of child abuse.. So be it!
SOURCE: http://www.listen-up.org/edu/options1.htmWhy can’t a person simply be deaf? This observation/question from my twelve-year old deserves an answer. Most of the people I interviewed are not extremists. Individuals who are members of the Deaf Community are able to communicate and become friends with members of the Hearing Community and visa versa. One deaf author comments “I understand all too well why the world of Deaf Culture may be somewhat intimidating to hearing parents. But it shouldn’t be. It improves communication, enriches lives. Like I said, it can bridge worlds together…The mistake here is having an ‘either-or’ mentality (i.e. your child will either sign, or he will speak).”14
Irene Schmalz, an oral deaf parent shares these thoughts: “It [Deaf Culture] is a matter of personal opinion and it is wonderful for those who wish to be a member.”15 The value of understanding that there is more than one way to approach deafness, lay in the ability to decipher the mindset behind all the “wonderful” advice that is frequently showered upon parents of deaf children.
Of course this shouldn't be ignored.Sweetmind said:There have been failures with CIs and those should not be ignored but there have been failures with many other things.
See this for some answers and an analysis of the whole situation from every angle: http://www.alldeaf.com/showpost.php?p=537781&postcount=31Sweetmind said:Unfortunately, thre are a lot of parents out there that absoultely dont care much about their children 's own success. Thats so sad, is it?
A quote from an article that has to do with oral failure (the quote does):Sweetmind said:Many of you ignored the serious problem ever since then.. HA and CI failure deaf children couldnt hear anything that is still teaching him with SEE that relates to a spoken language. No wonder many of us Deaf and deaf oralist are having tooo many serious problems with Reading and Writing for years and years that has not solved the problem yet.. Now you are using an excuse to have CI on Deaf chidren that has nothing to do with their learning abilities.
Source: http://www.dickinson.edu/nectfl/belka.htmlASL originated after Thomas Hopkin Gallaudet returned from an educational sojourn in France with an experienced teacher of the deaf, Laurent Clerc. Together they founded the first U. S. "permanent school for Deaf students" in Hartford, Connecticut in 1817 (Shelly and Schneck 24). For the next fifty years or so (1817-1867), Clerc taught his manual method to teachers from deaf schools throughout the country. The method spread, and new signs continued to be added. "In 1867 every American school for the deaf taught in ASL; by 1907 not a single one did" (Dolnick 50).
This abrupt change in methodology can be attributed to the well-intentioned efforts of influential educators like Horace Mann and Samuel Gridley Howe. They discovered while traveling in Germany that German deaf students could understand and speak German, while American deaf students had no oral skills in English. Howe founded a school for the deaf using the oral method in the late 1860's. When Alexander Graham Bell became a strong advocate for the oral method, it sounded the death knell for teaching the deaf in a language that was natural for them (Shelly and Schneck 25-26). In an attempt to force deaf children to learn oral English skills, the use of sign was forbidden in the classroom. However, the majority of children could not successfully learn oral skills and continued to communicate with each other through sign.
Another quote from the same article to back this up:Sweetmind said:Ears do not think but Brain does.. Deaf children are relying on their eyes to see and their hands to communicate that helps them to gain their intellectual skills and social motor skills that I have repeated this over and over. You just dont get it. so therefore you have a very serious problem reading and ignore it or refused to see the truth that works for Deaf children..
Historically, deaf children were thought to be mentally retarded and were subject to humiliation and mistreatment. Trapped in a world of silence, they were often hidden away or placed in mental institutions. However, the capacity for language, i. e., the ability to communicate through a system of visual symbols, was demonstrated whenever deaf people came into contact with each other. This natural sign language created by the deaf is unrelated to signed languages created by hearing people for special circumstances. (1)
American Sign Language and Deaf Culture. As early as 1500, an Italian doctor found that the deaf could be taught to associate written words with objects. Juan Pablo Bonet of Spain published a book ca. 1620 on simplifying the alphabet and teaching "Mutes to Speak." In the late 1750's or early 1760's, a young French priest, Charles Michel de l'Epée, was concerned about the spiritual salvation of the deaf and founded a school for deaf children. Aware that they communicated through signs, he became a champion for sign language, despite criticism by his contemporaries. In the late 1770's, the first public school for the deaf was founded in Germany. Samuel Heinicke, the school's founder, disagreed with his French contemporary and taught his students to speech read and speak German (Shelly and Schneck 19-24). His work marked the beginning of the debate, continuing today, on whether deaf children should learn a manual language or be taught oral skills to facilitate integration with the speaking community.
The reason for literacy being important is right here in this quote from the first link:Sweetmind said:You cannot blame on Deaf chlidren but look at yourself bragging about having a good ENGLISH while u cannot read it very well. I think it s a big joke ever since CLOGGY loves to pretend that he agreed with you , audist people. He is always twists peoples words....he should wake up and realize he does NOT know everything about ASL. Especially if he is not even a resident of America, where ASL is used.![]()
I prefer to focus on their READING And WRITING that needs to be done forcing them to listen those devices that doesnt make them hear everything. Scoffs!
LITERACY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN JUST HAVING A ORAL SPEAKING to hear FIRST itself. Thats Deaf children s right to have the good learning process without having any interference in their education.![]()
ASL is a perfect language, particularly for quick and easy communication among individuals who know the language. However, one of the drawbacks to having ASL as ones sole communication tool is that, to date, it does not have one generally accepted written form. The wonderful body of ASL literature has been passed down from one individual to the next in previous generations. Videotapes are now being used to record the wonderful visual poetry and stories shared by those who are members of Deaf Culture. Although individuals choose to remain a part of Deaf Culture, they still should have a means to access the body of literature from other cultures and times for their own edification. Without a written code to represent ASL, there is no way to transcribe the literature of other cultures into ASL aside from filming it. There is also no easy way of getting the vast body of general information available into ASL.
The other reason for learning English is one of practicality. English is the lingua franca of the land. Deaf children need to have the tools to become independent deaf adults. Some deaf children, but not all, will acquire the speech skills needed to communicate their desires within the larger society of hearing individuals. It is important to be able to clearly write if speaking is not an option. Writing and understanding English well are communication tools that will hopefully reap dividends when seeking employment as well.
...That's your belief, from a deaf standpoint. From a hearing standpoint - mine - the opposite could be child abuse!Sweetmind said:......................
I just cannot believe deaf children should be implanted. I believe it is a form of child abuse.. So be it!..........
Part of a child's succes is being able to communicate. One can choose to letthat communication be ASL. Or one can choose to give the possibility to communicate not just with sign or lip-reading, on might even consider to expand it to sound/hearing..Sweetmind said:.................Unfortunately, thre are a lot of parents out there that absoultely dont care much about their children 's own success. Thats so sad, is it?..........
An important misconception.. CI gives the possibility to hear. This is the opposite from your statement "couldn't hear a thing". I have read many personal experiences on this site that clearly state that they can hear with CI. Infact, they stat that they can hear better than with the HA they used previously.Sweetmind said:Many of you ignored the serious problem ever since then.. HA and CI failure deaf children couldnt hear anything that is still teaching him with SEE that relates to a spoken language...........
Sweetmind No wonder many of us Deaf and deaf oralist are having tooo many serious problems with Reading and Writing for years and years that has not solved the problem yet.. Now you are using an excuse to have CI on Deaf chidren that has nothing to do with their learning abilities...........[/quote said:Excuse.... no this CI will help you to hear, so making it easier to understand speech and thereby write. CI expands the learning possibilities. So with this, withholding CI for children that would otherwise benefit from it would be terible. If you want children to have it easier toe learn, why would you then be opposed to CI... You are taking away possibilities!Failing English... Whichg group of children ae you talking about:Sweetmind said:.....So now the next thing is you are degrading on CI deaf children who failed their English written by SEE and mainstream schools.. So it doesnt change bit at all. I find this is really wacko! You are hurting Deaf children s future that has not change a bit as well...........
The group that did not have CI early in life because you don't like the idea and therefore got it when they were older OR
The group of children that got CI as soon as possible and therefore grew up with sound.
I bet the latter group is not failing English.
but this group is still small. And was it up to you, that group would stop to existTeaching children English using ASL sounds to me teaching an english child German using French. Sure, it can be done.Sweetmind said:....
Thats why I am very supporting ASL that helps them to have a good reader and writer after all orally speaking or spoken language that slows them down to learn more than what u can give a little.. ..........So have I. What's your point?Sweetmind said:....I have seen a lot of ASLers who can write and read very well.. So what is your point after all, they do not wear HA or CI? ..........That is sad that you were not allowed to grow up with deaf people. Some other members here have been in the same situation and grew up among hearing people. Theyy are not resentful. What happened to you?Sweetmind said:.Thats why I have no respect for some of you who are being so rude and disrespectful toward Deaf children who are very innocent that have the conformation as a hearing child while they cannot hear everything with their devices. It was/is totally unfair treatment to force them to keep away from other Deaf children or destroy Deaf schools that provide everything for them while Mainstream school doesnt have it but just having a very guttering interpreter with SEE only. Many of them are not happy as I know it so. ..........So, if I pretend to agree with the audist people .... that means that I amd not audist. WOW. Thanks Sweety.Sweetmind said:...You cannot blame on Deaf chlidren but look at yourself bragging about having a good ENGLISH while u cannot read it very well. I think it s a big joke ever since CLOGGY loves to pretend that he agreed with you , audist people. ..........Eh.. I do not know everything? There's more to know? Tell me please... Ah, come on Sweetmind. Show me where I said I know everything! You know and I know that I never did. So why write it down like that... ???Sweetmind said:He is always twists peoples words....he should wake up and realize he does NOT know everything about ASL. Especially if he is not even a resident of America, where ASL is used...........
Lots of ASL-love
Cloggy
So 98% of the world has no excuse not to learn ASL... WOW!!!Sweetmind said:......There are NO excuses for not learning ASL ....
Thats why I am very supporting ASL that helps them to have a good reader and writer after all orally speaking or spoken language that slows them down to learn more than what u can give a little.. These Deaf children will receive a little .. Well, you need to have the wake up calls and change your own attitude about ASL
^Angel^ said:Actually I see ALOT of good points in this thread, but it seems to me you won't keep an open mind where others are coming from too, and I find it a bit odd that you said many of us are trying to destory your thread, can you please show me where? and I remember you have tried to destory more than just one thread since you have been a member here, I'm not here to put you down, but sometimes you don't look at what you're doing yourself but only to pin point the blame on others, it don't work that way hon, got to learn that it goes both ways, and beside you said this thread is only about hearing aids, why did you bring up about closed capition?...
![]()
A more accurate comparison (and one which I believe in) is that it's more like a parent making a hearing kid deaf because the CI is a CHANGE. That's where Sweetmind's probably coming from.Cloggy said:...That's your belief, from a deaf standpoint. From a hearing standpoint - mine - the opposite could be child abuse!
I'm still waiting for people to show me where I said I knew everything and that oral speech is useless and that I hate being a hearing person.Cloggy said:Eh.. I do not know everything? There's more to know? Tell me please... Ah, come on Sweetmind. Show me where I said I know everything! You know and I know that I never did. So why write it down like that... ???
Fragmenter said:Of. Course. I. Needed. To. Do. Research. On. Cochlear. Implants. Because. I. Grew. Up. In. The. Deaf. Community. And. Never. Paid. Attention. To. Cochlear. Implants.
Understand?
Fact: many deaf people in the deaf community struggles with English. Way more than 15%
How do I know this? Out of my freshman class, only 4 of us made the elite English class at Gallaudet. They were going to make us to write for the school newspaper eventually. 4 out of, what, 100? I know only a handful of students made the Advanced English class and the remaining students took their basic English classes.
Brief background on my life: I instantly made friends with deaf people who had great understanding of the English language because we could communicate on a deeper level. Believe me, we've had countless conversations regarding the Deaf and their struggles with literacy. I shouldn't be saying this but I'm so sick and tired of your boyfriend's propaganda.
I worked my ass off at English even though it's my second language. You guys are beyond comprehension.
The point is I wish every deaf people could read and write English at a sastifactory level so we wouldn't have so many misunderstandings. If you think I'm ashamed of or looking down at us -- you couldn't be more wrong.
I am ending this squabble with you, GNU, because it's getting too personal and I'm starting to entertain the thought of five minutes with you in an enclosed room. I'm better than that so have a nice life not ever opening your mind to the world. I hope someday you'll wake up, son.
![]()
SxyPorkie said:I know you and your sister had attended to the mainstreaming school,,, you had not been involved in the Deaf Culture... I was HOH since i was baby.. as i grew up,, there were no closed captioned on tv at all,,, once in while we watched closed captioned films at school,,, i grew up in Deaf Culture... Nowadays there are better technologies for all Deafies,,, closed captioned is part of the Deaf Culture,,,, you need to be more involved in the Deaf Culture to help yourself understand,,, I know there are lots of oral or mainstreamng schools,,, lots of my friends from there were complained to me they felt left out until they met deafies and got involved now they are happier than ever,,,
Thanks,
SxyPorkie