Do you approve of Gov. Bush's actions?

Do you approve?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 32.1%

  • No

    Votes: 19 67.9%
  • Total voters
    28
C

Cheri

Prayers for my dad.
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2003
Messages
22,755
Reaction score
9
Do you approve of Gov. Bush's request to let the state take Schiavo into protective custody and, presumably, restore her feeding tube. Bush cited new allegations that Schiavo was neglected and abused, and challenged her diagnosis as being in a persistent vegetative state? Yes or no and explain your reason please.....
 
I don't mind who , as long they save Terri's life, that is all I care....
 
Oceanbreeze said:
I voted no. Gov. Bush had no business interfering in this case.
Click to expand...


That is funny how you say that when Michael had the court inferfering in Terri's business to begin with.
 
I know im a republican but now i have some doubts about president bush. When he was governor of texas he supported the right to die in dignity law. Now he wants people who are very sick to live in suffer. I just wish theres some way to make dick cheney take over.
 
ravensteve1961 said:
I know im a republican but now i have some doubts about president bush. When he was governor of texas he supported the right to die in dignity law. Now he wants people who are very sick to live in suffer. I just wish theres some way to make dick cheney take over.
Click to expand...


Ravensteve,

:slap: Gov. Bush is not the President of the United States, Gov. Bush is the Gov. of Florida hon. President Bush's brother. Get it now? ;)
 
ravensteve1961 said:
I know im a republican but now i have some doubts about president bush. When he was governor of texas he supported the right to die in dignity law. Now he wants people who are very sick to live in suffer. I just wish theres some way to make dick cheney take over.
Click to expand...

It's called hypocricy. All the conservative republicans are being hypocrites. Jeb didn't have authority to step in, and he knew it. Congress didn't have the authority to step in, and THEY knew it. They conveniently interjected themselves into the case to deflect attention away fromTom Delay. ALso, Randall Terry and his cronies are making a mockery of this case. It's all very sad.

As for Dick Cheney taking over, that won't do a damn bit of good. He's just as much a conservative as the rest of them. What you need here is a moderate Republican overseeing the case. Thank GOD the courts have acted appropriately in the case. Otherwise, we'd ALL be in trouble!
 
No, Cheri, RSteve is talking about the law that Prez signed when he was governor of Texas. A couple days ago in Texas a doctor ended the life of a terminally itt baby against the mother's wishes.
 
Oceanbreeze said:
Thank GOD the courts have acted appropriately in the case. Otherwise, we'd ALL be in trouble!
Click to expand...


What do you mean "we'd all be in trouble"? Explain that?
 
Tousi said:
No, Cheri, RSteve is talking about the law that Prez signed when he was governor of Texas. A couple days ago in Texas a doctor ended the life of a terminally itt baby against the mother's wishes.
Click to expand...


I don't know anything about the baby against the mother's wishes, What does this have to do with the topic itself? The more people go off topic the more confuse I get. hahaha.
 
Oceanbreeze said:
Thank GOD the courts have acted appropriately in the case. Otherwise, we'd ALL be in trouble!
Click to expand...

The court did not acted appropriately cause the judge never saw Terri's in person, so like I said, the rule that the court made was unfair period, the judge treat her like she was actually on a death row.... :roll:
 
Well, Terri didn't have a living will. So it's really up to Michael to make the final decision. After all, he is her husband, and legally... he has the right to make the final decision.

Not the parents. But if she wasn't married, then her parents would be responsible for her, not Michael. That's probably why the courts kept on rejecting all of the appeals made by the parents, because the parents are not legally entitled to having the final say. Michael is, as long they are married.

Not trying to offend anybody, but that's how it works.
 
I disagree period because its not her husband at all since he broke the marriage vows, and he was unfaithful, so I believe he has absolutly no right to make that choice period!
 
Angel, hon, I know you keep saying the judge has not seen Terri. Judges are not allowed to base their decisions on emotions; they are based on the LAW. Laws can be changed but not by judges. Call the Florida Legislature. :hug:
 
Tousi said:
Angel, hon, I know you keep saying the judge has not seen Terri. Judges are not allowed to base their decisions on emotions; they are based on the LAW. Laws can be changed but not by judges. Call the Florida Legislator. :hug:
Click to expand...


Since when did the law says you allow to murder someone? If you strave your children, You will be charge with a crime, If you strave your pet You will be charge with a crime, so the judge broke the law, straving a person :dizzy:
 
Hey, hey, Cheri, take it easy; don't look at me; talk to Florida. Weren't you just there? :hug:
 
Tousi said:
Angel, hon, I know you keep saying the judge has not seen Terri. Judges are not allowed to base their decisions on emotions; they are based on the LAW. Laws can be changed but not by judges. Call the Florida Legislature. :hug:
Click to expand...


I'm sorry if I keep saying that, but I have watch those videos of Terri, I watched the news and seeing her on it, I see her pictures in front of newspaper etc....It tears me up so bad to see her like this, if you see the way she smiles, if you see how happy she was when her mom was there, if you can look really closer and see the light in her eyes, you will understand that how hard it is to let this girl die by pulling a feeding tubes out of her body and make her starve to death slowly, :::ahem::: excuess me here.... umm..... what I'm saying is she is a human being, she is breathing on her own, she is not on a machine that keeping her alive, the only thing she is on is the feeding tubes cause she can't feed herself, .....

Let me take a break here....
 
Banjo said:
Well, Terri didn't have a living will. So it's really up to Michael to make the final decision. After all, he is her husband, and legally... he has the right to make the final decision.

Not the parents. But if she wasn't married, then her parents would be responsible for her, not Michael. That's probably why the courts kept on rejecting all of the appeals made by the parents, because the parents are not legally entitled to having the final say. Michael is, as long they are married.

Not trying to offend anybody, but that's how it works.
Click to expand...


Oh is that how it works a cheating husband allow to kill his own wife by straving her? Is that some kind of love and caring husband that anyone would want? Oh please....
 
Back
Top