Death threats to Palin and her family

Status
Not open for further replies.
Righto, Reba.
 
jillio said:
Why only policticians? It is wrong across the board.:cool2:
Click to expand...

Even then...

Nothing is ever set in stone. Why should people be added to the list, when it might be used against them in the future over small quibbles and amplification of details that would normally be forgiven?
 
posts from hell said:
I didn't see any troll attempt in there... ?
Click to expand...

3.) NO TROLLING. A troll is someone who provokes members into flaming discussions by posting outrageous messages, and usually ends with name callings and flame wars.
Click to expand...

A troll is someone who provokes members into flaming discussions by posting [insidious] messages, usually ends with [deceitful unspoken labeling and defamation].
 
so was this post necessary?

Why those keep silent about violence against U.S. policians when it's wrong to do so? I simply cannot understand the keeping mum on this one.
Click to expand...

Who else agrees? Interesting to see who is on the list so far and those who aren't. Hmmmm....
Click to expand...
 
Jiro said:
A troll is someone who provokes members into flaming discussions by posting [insidious] messages, usually ends with [deceitful unspoken labeling and defamation].
Click to expand...

I know what a troll is. I just don't see it.

I mean, it's perfectly clear... Why would anyone wish harm to any people that runs our country?

Pretty easy to say that I don't wish harm to anyone.. Hence the reason I signed on..
 
souggy said:
Even then...

Nothing is ever set in stone. Why should people be added to the list, when it might be used against them in the future over small quibbles and amplification of details that would normally be forgiven?
Click to expand...

Agreed. And nothing should ever be set in stone. Mitigating circumstance and individual variables always need to be considered.
 
Jiro said:
A troll is someone who provokes members into flaming discussions by posting [insidious] messages, usually ends with [deceitful unspoken labeling and defamation].
Click to expand...

I have no problem seeing your perspective, Jiro, and frankly, it is right on target.
 
posts from hell said:
I know what a troll is. I just don't see it.

I mean, it's perfectly clear... Why would anyone wish harm to any people that runs our country?

Pretty easy to say that I don't wish harm to anyone.. Hence the reason I signed on..
Click to expand...

who doesn't? I don't need to publicly declare my stance on this. As you said - it's perfectly clear. I think The Tenth Commandments is perfectly and succinctly clear about this....

To repeatedly elicit "aye" response and wording it in a way that non-response answer is the one who wanted to wish harm to anyone... perhaps it is not perfectly clear for this person. I guess that's what happens when one lives in isolated area for a little too long.......
 
Jiro said:
who doesn't? I don't need to publicly declare my stance on this. As you said - it's perfectly clear. I think The Tenth Commandments is perfectly and succinctly clear about this....

To repeatedly elicit "aye" response and wording it in a way that non-response answer is the one who wanted to wish harm to anyone... perhaps it is not perfectly clear for this person. I guess that's what happens when one lives in isolated area for a little too long.......
Click to expand...

No need for religion.

Why refuse to get on the list? I mean, its simple?

If you dont want to say anything, why are you bothered so much?
 
posts from hell said:
No need for religion.
Click to expand...
Religious? how is it religious if our laws and moral value on murder, stealing, adultery, and lying are exactly same as the Tenth Commandments?

posts from hell said:
Why refuse to get on the list? I mean, it's simple?
Click to expand...
Never said I refused to get on the list. My stance is quite crystal-clear and simple in my post #170.
(btw - fixed for you)

posts from hell said:
If you don't want to say anything, why are you bothered so much?
Click to expand...
It is not that I don't want to say anything. It is koko who repeatedly implied that people who did not respond with "aye" do condone the violence.
(btw - fixed for you)
 
souggy said:
Even then...

Nothing is ever set in stone. Why should people be added to the list, when it might be used against them in the future over small quibbles and amplification of details that would normally be forgiven?
Click to expand...

I don't really care. we should treat anyone with respect no matter what their background is. Beside, whenever I think something will be used against me, people think it is silly.

But you are right, the question was unnecessary it doesn't prove anything because majority of us don't support threats and such. But assuming we do just because we are not liberal/democrat/whatever was unnecessary as well.
 
Jiro said:
Religious? how is it religious if our laws and moral value on murder, stealing, adultery, and lying are exactly same as the Tenth Commandments?


Never said I refused to get on the list. My stance is quite crystal-clear and simple in my post #170.
(btw - fixed for you)


It is not that I don't want to say anything. It is koko who repeatedly implied that people who did not respond with "aye" do condone the violence.
(btw - fixed for you)
Click to expand...

Exactly. And particularly so when their position has been made clear in previous posts.
 
Lighthouse77 said:
I don't really care. we should treat anyone with respect no matter what their background is. Beside, whenever I think something will be used against me, people think it is silly.

But you are right, the question was unnecessary it doesn't prove anything because majority of us don't support threats and such. But assuming we do just because we are not liberal/democrat/whatever was unnecessary as well.
Click to expand...

You're right. It's silly to think that the list of names (of those who say it's wrong to condone violence against politicians, political party, political organization, and/or the damage and destruction of their properties) may be used against them someday for speaking up. I mean, seriously.
 
It is even sillier to compile such a list to begin with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top