Deaf vet sues police

Alex

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2003
Messages
4,225
Reaction score
143
A deaf veteran who broke four ribs when he was arrested by police in August has filed a lawsuit against the officer and the Honolulu Police Department.

In a complaint filed Oct. 12 in Circuit Court, Martin Swanson alleges Officer Damon Taylor falsely arrested him, used excessive force and violated his civil rights. Swanson seeks damages to be determined at trial.

Swanson, 54, was to go to trial today in Honolulu District Court on a harassment charge stemming from the Aug. 26 incident at Keeaumoku and Young streets.

According to the suit, Taylor was working special duty at a construction site at the intersection when Swanson, headed toward a Beretania Street bus stop, apparently walked onto a sidewalk that was closed.

Swanson later said he saw the sign, but because he was tired and there was no construction at the time, he decided to walk on the closed sidewalk rather then cross the street.

The officer allegedly approached Swanson and told him several times that the sidewalk was closed, but Swanson, who lost his hearing in an explosion during the Vietnam War, continued walking.

The officer allegedly stepped in front of him and told him the sidewalk was closed, but Swanson pointed to his right ear, indicating he could not hear. When Swanson continued walking toward Beretania Street, the officer again stepped in front of him, the suit said.

When Swanson turned back to cross Keeaumoku at Young Street, the officer blocked his way and held up his fingers in a rectangular shape, which Swanson understood as a request for ID.

But as Swanson reached for his ID, the officer allegedly took him down, causing him serious injuries, the suit said. Swanson incurred medical expenses and lost wages from his job as a U.S. Postal Service mail sorter.

Swanson's attorney Rodney Ching has said police went overboard and the charge against Swanson should have been dismissed earlier.

Prosecutors indicated charges would not have been filed if there wasn't enough evidence.

By Debra Barayuga
http://starbulletin.com/2004/10/20/news/story11.html
 
That's a saddening thing to happen...obviously the cop overreacted and wrongfully arrested the deaf guy. :roll:
 
That's really sad to hear, looks like the policeman went a bit too far....I should say ' overboard '...
 
I am confused. This guy lost his hearing during a war. I supposed he was hearing for a long time and could talk. Why didn't he say he was deaf with his voice? Sounds a bit fishy. Also, he walked on the sidewalk, and I am sure that he knew the police was telling him to get off, but I think the deaf guy was just pretending to be stupid and take advantage of his deafness to continue. Policemen are very weary when people reach for their pockets because of guns. I think it sounds very fishy and the guy tried to take advantage of his deafness. Why didn't he take paper and pen? There were times before when people tried to "play mime" with me to tell me something and I couldn't get what they say.

The question is what could the police have done differently? He walked away, why? Just because he couldn't hear? I wouldn't do that unless I was sure that I was okay to leave by them. I am sorry, it's just too fishy.
 
I am confused. This guy lost his hearing during a war. I supposed he was hearing for a long time and could talk. Why didn't he say he was deaf with his voice? Sounds a bit fishy. Also, he walked on the sidewalk, and I am sure that he knew the police was telling him to get off, but I think the deaf guy was just pretending to be stupid and take advantage of his deafness to continue. Policemen are very weary when people reach for their pockets because of guns. I think it sounds very fishy and the guy tried to take advantage of his deafness. Why didn't he take paper and pen? There were times before when people tried to "play mime" with me to tell me something and I couldn't get what they say.

The question is what could the police have done differently? He walked away, why? Just because he couldn't hear? I wouldn't do that unless I was sure that I was okay to leave by them. I am sorry, it's just too fishy.

I know of this case and I can tell you that he is playing the deaf vet role to the extreme. It was unfair to the Officer and it didn't do down like you are reading in the newspapers. This person was irrate at being asked to leave a "blocked off" construction zone for his safety. He's not blind, couldn't he see the debris from the building being demolished. He also refused treatment at the scene and at a local hospital. Everyone was surprised at the claims about broken ribs and not being able to work for a month. This is an attempt to get money, plain and simple.
 
I know of this case and I can tell you that he is playing the deaf vet role to the extreme. It was unfair to the Officer and it didn't do down like you are reading in the newspapers. This person was irrate at being asked to leave a "blocked off" construction zone for his safety. He's not blind, couldn't he see the debris from the building being demolished. He also refused treatment at the scene and at a local hospital. Everyone was surprised at the claims about broken ribs and not being able to work for a month. This is an attempt to get money, plain and simple.

that may be true in this case but it may be inporatant to note that that some people who lose their hearing find it rally difuacult to speak so thay don't, and on the other hand I never met anyone that crossed the street just to cross it again in 1,000 yards I just walk along the road by the blocked off part. I AM NOT condoning this guy in anyway just saying things to think about.
 
Back
Top